Meet the Other Phone. A phone that grows with your child.

Meet the Other Phone.
A phone that grows with your child.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

To think it's tragic if Michael Jackson was indeed innocent

1000 replies

pregahes · 08/01/2024 21:53

It's a real shame for someone who created incredible music to have their legacy at risk. It’s just tragic, considering the impact his music had on so many. It's tragic either way, if he's guilty for the victims and if he's innocent for himself.

I'm a huge fan and at one point t thought he was guilty but kore recently change of heart. I think there would be more victims if he weee in fact guilty. Somethings doesnt add up.

It's tragic

OP posts:
Thread gallery
43
Mirabai · 09/01/2024 22:02

I've followed his story from when he claimed nothing f happened til now and I just don't find him credible...because he said too many times nothing happened.

Sorry what?

When he was still young, still in thrall to MJ, still in love with him, he denied the abuse. He wanted to defend and protect him. Then when he was older and was honest with himself he acknowledged and accepted it.

How many women come onto these forums and work through the realisation that an experience or ”relationship” they had as a child was abuse?

And you’re holding denial against him?! Would you hold it against women?

RoaringtoLangClegintheDark · 09/01/2024 22:03

KarenNotAKaren Flowers

It pisses me off SO much when people do empty, performative virtue signalling about how awful CSA is, but simultaneously fuel a climate where survivors are less likely to be believed, to even be able to speak about their experiences.

And along similar lines, the BBC doing all its fanfares about Children in Need while continuing to play Jackson’s music is a real kick in the teeth for survivors, especially for anyone who wasn’t believed, and who wasn’t supported.

Particularly given how they protected (and benefited from) Savile for all those years. They knew what Savile was, and they know what Jackson was.

But they won’t stand up for survivors. They won’t actually implement a policy of zero tolerance for child abusers. Continuing to play Jackson’s music shows that you can be a really nasty nonce but still be feted by the BBC and everyone else as long as you never got properly caught. Sickening.

Bendrix · 09/01/2024 22:11

Think it's pretty safe to say the guy was a sex offender

RoaringtoLangClegintheDark · 09/01/2024 22:13

Mirabai · 09/01/2024 22:02

I've followed his story from when he claimed nothing f happened til now and I just don't find him credible...because he said too many times nothing happened.

Sorry what?

When he was still young, still in thrall to MJ, still in love with him, he denied the abuse. He wanted to defend and protect him. Then when he was older and was honest with himself he acknowledged and accepted it.

How many women come onto these forums and work through the realisation that an experience or ”relationship” they had as a child was abuse?

And you’re holding denial against him?! Would you hold it against women?

Exactly. There’s still so much ignorance about grooming and the impacts of it, the impact of sustained CSA.

How denial that the abuse is abuse is one of the most common coping mechanisms, if not the most common. How a victim can and will rationalise it in all sorts of ways, or just compartmentalise it, shut it away and do anything but think about it.

Plus there’s the threat I mentioned upthread that Jackson made to at least one of the boys (I forget which), that if he told anyone about the abuse then both Jackson and he, the boy, would go to prison.

OP, is it really so hard for you to see how a child could, in those circumstances, initially lie and say nothing happened? Are you that lacking in empathy or understanding of the human condition, of how it is to be a vulnerable child dealing with things you’re really not equipped to deal with?

Terfosaurus · 09/01/2024 22:15

@pregahes
I've followed his story from when he claimed nothing f happened til now and I just don't find him credible...because he said too many times nothing happened. It just seems odd to me

Can you really not work out why a child might have been to scared to say the truth? Really? Not even if you think really really hard?

Mirabai · 09/01/2024 22:16

RoaringtoLangClegintheDark · 09/01/2024 22:03

KarenNotAKaren Flowers

It pisses me off SO much when people do empty, performative virtue signalling about how awful CSA is, but simultaneously fuel a climate where survivors are less likely to be believed, to even be able to speak about their experiences.

And along similar lines, the BBC doing all its fanfares about Children in Need while continuing to play Jackson’s music is a real kick in the teeth for survivors, especially for anyone who wasn’t believed, and who wasn’t supported.

Particularly given how they protected (and benefited from) Savile for all those years. They knew what Savile was, and they know what Jackson was.

But they won’t stand up for survivors. They won’t actually implement a policy of zero tolerance for child abusers. Continuing to play Jackson’s music shows that you can be a really nasty nonce but still be feted by the BBC and everyone else as long as you never got properly caught. Sickening.

Excellent post.

And don’t get me started on the fact that Sony were the ultimate funders via subsidiaries of the Square One film trying to discredit the survivors. The same Sony that paid not far off a billion for MJ’s back catalogue.

nolongersurprised · 09/01/2024 22:18

Mirabai · 09/01/2024 22:02

I've followed his story from when he claimed nothing f happened til now and I just don't find him credible...because he said too many times nothing happened.

Sorry what?

When he was still young, still in thrall to MJ, still in love with him, he denied the abuse. He wanted to defend and protect him. Then when he was older and was honest with himself he acknowledged and accepted it.

How many women come onto these forums and work through the realisation that an experience or ”relationship” they had as a child was abuse?

And you’re holding denial against him?! Would you hold it against women?

in addition, all of the messages he was getting from the adults around him were that everything is fine, nothing concerning happening.

All of the boys MJ travelled with, slept with were groomed and confused and let down by the adults around them. How many people could have said something and didn’t? Even just by pointing out that it’s fucked up to travel with children, fucked up to have them sleep over.

It’s completely different to a peadophile snatching a child from the street and sexually abusing them. The children MJ abused would have taken their cues from the adults around them, and sadly those adults let them down.

It makes perfect sense that it took a long time for some of them to recognise that abuse occurred.

Waitingfordoggo · 09/01/2024 22:18

App13 · 09/01/2024 09:51

I believe he is innocent. At that time in the 80s and 90s he was the most major star around.

And I think that led to greed to pursue him.

My favorite song of his is Man in the Mirror.

I have used those lyrics in my life to set at example to others and behave as morally as I can. I feel , if someone is able to write those lyrics, they cannot do any wrong.

Oh, come the fuck on.

KarenNotAKaren · 09/01/2024 22:19

For those saying the fact Robson stuck up for Jackson initially - my mum asked me outright as a child of I was being abused by the man who was abusing me.

I said no.

Looking back someone finding out scared the shit out of me. I can’t quite explain why it it did - at the time I felt like it would be the worst thing that could happen

StopTheQtipWhenTheresResistance · 09/01/2024 22:21

KarenNotAKaren · 09/01/2024 22:19

For those saying the fact Robson stuck up for Jackson initially - my mum asked me outright as a child of I was being abused by the man who was abusing me.

I said no.

Looking back someone finding out scared the shit out of me. I can’t quite explain why it it did - at the time I felt like it would be the worst thing that could happen

Thank you for explaining and sharing. I remember one section in the documentary where Wade Robson mentions that he only realised it was wrong when his son was born because he pictured how he would feel someone doing those things to his son and it made him feel sick.

DuchessOfPort · 09/01/2024 22:23

I haven’t read anything except the OPs posts and few others so this has probably already been said - I had an open mind on him until I watched the documentary - the open mind was because of his acquittal.

Once I watched the documentary I was entirely certain he abused those boys and a key thing for me is that no one has said he had penetrative sex with them. That would be obvious thing to say if you were making it up. Their stories are so consistent and no one claimed to have been raped. He absolutely abused them.

KarenNotAKaren · 09/01/2024 22:23

StopTheQtipWhenTheresResistance · 09/01/2024 22:21

Thank you for explaining and sharing. I remember one section in the documentary where Wade Robson mentions that he only realised it was wrong when his son was born because he pictured how he would feel someone doing those things to his son and it made him feel sick.

So my BFF is a psychologist who works with adult victims of CSA. She says that her patients almost exclusively come to her after they have their first child. Having children is a big trigger for CSA victims (as it was for me) because for many it’s the first time they can step out their sphere and think “holy fuck I would never want that to happen to my child!” And they have the lightbulb moment.

pregahes · 09/01/2024 22:25

@Itsmychristmasdress can you be more specific, it wasn't porn I read but artwork and secret rooms I think I'd have if I were famous to be honest - I'd be worried a maid would spy on me or something. And that doesn't mean I'd be doing anything weird but I would VERY paranoid if I were famous

OP posts:
Random30 · 09/01/2024 22:26

StopTheQtipWhenTheresResistance · 08/01/2024 23:54

@KarenNotAKaren I didn't write them in any particular order, was just thinking of my reasons and then typed them out.

I agree it doesn't mean he was innocent, it also doesn't mean he was guilty of sexual assault and rape. I'm a very evidence based person, as in physical evidence that can link a person to a particular act without any shadow of a doubt.

I believe it would be bad parenting because no one can truly know someone's intentions and it shouldn't be a risk parents should take.

His behaviour is certainly odd but can we really go as far as saying he had sex with these boys based on what information is available?

It seems like you want to see the video of those boys being raped before you’ll deign to believe them.

You actually have a nerve to intellectualise in this fashion. You know perfectly well MJ was a paedophile. Him saying my intentions of sharing with those boys were pure, is not reasonable, and it is outrageous that you as a supposedly cool headed adult think his behaviour is not criminal.
put any other man doing his actions and it is obvious.

pregahes · 09/01/2024 22:27

@Terfosaurus that's the point, wade denied it well into his thirties

OP posts:
StopTheQtipWhenTheresResistance · 09/01/2024 22:35

@Random30 We are all entitled to our views. I kindly ask that you don't presume to tell me what I do or do not think. Thank you.

StopTheQtipWhenTheresResistance · 09/01/2024 22:38

@KarenNotAKaren that is interesting and something I would have never considered but it does make sense. When you think about yourself, you (general you) can justify it in your mind but when the thought is of it happening to someone else, it can really hit home. Like you say, it helps a person to have more of an outside view. Hope that makes sense; not sure I've explained myself too well; sorry.

pregahes · 09/01/2024 22:41

It's fair to say even if you think he's innocent, the behaviour we saw in plain sight was not acceptable

On any level

OP posts:
Whyohwhywyoming · 09/01/2024 22:42

Notimeforaname · 08/01/2024 22:02

I also dont believe he did any of it. And he wasn't found guilty.

He definitely slept in a bed with young children, as he said himself, so I don’t know how you can not believe “any of it”

Terfosaurus · 09/01/2024 22:42

pregahes · 09/01/2024 22:27

@Terfosaurus that's the point, wade denied it well into his thirties

Yes... so why does that mean its not true ?

Mirabai · 09/01/2024 22:43

I'm a very evidence based person, as in physical evidence that can link a person to a particular act without any shadow of a doubt.

Which never exists in sex crimes, so then what? Do you let all the sexual abusers for lack of physical evidence?

StopTheQtipWhenTheresResistance · 09/01/2024 22:44

Mirabai · 09/01/2024 22:43

I'm a very evidence based person, as in physical evidence that can link a person to a particular act without any shadow of a doubt.

Which never exists in sex crimes, so then what? Do you let all the sexual abusers for lack of physical evidence?

That is unfortunately the reason why it very difficult to prosecute these crimes with a lack of physical evidence.

Mirabai · 09/01/2024 22:48

StopTheQtipWhenTheresResistance · 09/01/2024 22:44

That is unfortunately the reason why it very difficult to prosecute these crimes with a lack of physical evidence.

There’s rarely physical evidence in sex crimes and there’s never physical evidence in historic sex crimes. And yet they are prosecuted anyway because the court accepts types of evidence that is not purely physical, unlike you.

MasterBeth · 09/01/2024 22:48

"I'm not saying Michael Jackson is guilty. But if I was a billionaire paedophile, I’d buy a funfair for my back garden."

-- Jimmy Carr

Itsmychristmasdress · 09/01/2024 22:49

pregahes · 09/01/2024 22:25

@Itsmychristmasdress can you be more specific, it wasn't porn I read but artwork and secret rooms I think I'd have if I were famous to be honest - I'd be worried a maid would spy on me or something. And that doesn't mean I'd be doing anything weird but I would VERY paranoid if I were famous

https://www.digitalmusicnews.com/2016/06/21/items-discovered-police-michael-jackson/

This is the list.....

Items Discovered by Police In Michael Jackson's Residence (NSFW)

The list of items discovered in Michael Jackson's Neverland Ranch by police in a 2003. The Santa Barbara Sheriff's Department is not denying their validity.

https://www.digitalmusicnews.com/2016/06/21/items-discovered-police-michael-jackson

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.