Meet the Other Phone. Protection built in.

Meet the Other Phone.
Protection built in.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

To think it's tragic if Michael Jackson was indeed innocent

1000 replies

pregahes · 08/01/2024 21:53

It's a real shame for someone who created incredible music to have their legacy at risk. It’s just tragic, considering the impact his music had on so many. It's tragic either way, if he's guilty for the victims and if he's innocent for himself.

I'm a huge fan and at one point t thought he was guilty but kore recently change of heart. I think there would be more victims if he weee in fact guilty. Somethings doesnt add up.

It's tragic

OP posts:
Thread gallery
43
StopTheQtipWhenTheresResistance · 09/01/2024 17:36

Can we leave each other's kids out of this discussion?

RoaringtoLangClegintheDark · 09/01/2024 17:37

Mindblowing the number of people who think there plausibly could be a perfectly innocent explanation as to why a grown man was so keen to share his bed with multiple little pre-pubescent boys.

Mindblowing.

This is one reason why CSA is so common. The fuckers can do it in plain sight and there are way too many who will make excuses for them, no matter what.

I think even if there was video evidence of him abusing them, some people on here would find a way to deny it. “Oh he was just being affectionate/giving him first aid/teaching him about male bonding,” or god knows what; take your heads our of your arses, people.

KarenNotAKaren · 09/01/2024 17:39

PeppermintMandy · 09/01/2024 14:44

Incorrect.

Rewatch the interview with Martin Bashir.

Michael is sat with his arm around a boy (about 10 years old?) and Martin asks the boy, “How do you feel about sharing a bed with Michael?” The boy replies, “He kept asking and asking me to share his bed and I kept saying no. One day he said if I loved him I’d do it so I started doing it. It’s not so bad.”

So no, these little boys weren’t enthusiastically jumping into bed with an adult man. They were being emotionally manipulated into doing something they had repeatedly told Michael they didn’t want to do.

Jordan Chandler’s mum testified in the 2005 trial and shared her experience of Jackson begging to sleep with her son. Reading it makes your blood run cold. He was vile and manipulative

BigMandsTattooPortfolio · 09/01/2024 17:41

RoaringtoLangClegintheDark · 09/01/2024 17:37

Mindblowing the number of people who think there plausibly could be a perfectly innocent explanation as to why a grown man was so keen to share his bed with multiple little pre-pubescent boys.

Mindblowing.

This is one reason why CSA is so common. The fuckers can do it in plain sight and there are way too many who will make excuses for them, no matter what.

I think even if there was video evidence of him abusing them, some people on here would find a way to deny it. “Oh he was just being affectionate/giving him first aid/teaching him about male bonding,” or god knows what; take your heads our of your arses, people.

I know. I mean how naive do you have to be. Jackson even had a type.

KarenNotAKaren · 09/01/2024 17:41

Mustardseed86 · 09/01/2024 15:25

Unless the documentary says he wasn't sleeping in bed with those boys (actually, we know he was) and exposing them to pornography (again, we know he did), didn't have an elaborate alarm system to tell him when people were approaching his bedroom (he did), I can't see how it's anything other than the typical attempt to discredit the victims.

Yes this.

What a lot of it comes down to is “the victims weren’t victimy enough” which is fucking gross

RoaringtoLangClegintheDark · 09/01/2024 17:42

He was vile and manipulative.

100%.

KarenNotAKaren · 09/01/2024 17:44

Iwasafool · 09/01/2024 15:41

I haven't seen the interview. Did anyone ask the parents why their ten year old was repeatedly staying with MJ? Did they have a view on him sharing a bed with an adult.

I think the parents needed to be investigated as well as MJ.

Yes if you watch Leaving Neverland the mothers are interviewed.

Once accepts she fucked up big time and got swept away with the game and fortune and glamour. The other was entirely and utterly unremorseful and spoke in happy ways about Jackson. She then couldn’t understand why her DIL refused access to her grandson when the sex abuse allegations came out. They also interviewed the DIL who was horrified that her husband was ever allowed to be left with a stranger and made her feelings about her MIL very clear.

Mirabai · 09/01/2024 17:44

RoaringtoLangClegintheDark · 09/01/2024 17:37

Mindblowing the number of people who think there plausibly could be a perfectly innocent explanation as to why a grown man was so keen to share his bed with multiple little pre-pubescent boys.

Mindblowing.

This is one reason why CSA is so common. The fuckers can do it in plain sight and there are way too many who will make excuses for them, no matter what.

I think even if there was video evidence of him abusing them, some people on here would find a way to deny it. “Oh he was just being affectionate/giving him first aid/teaching him about male bonding,” or god knows what; take your heads our of your arses, people.

And this is a good example of grooming. MJ and Savile groomed their fans as well as the children concerned and their families.

It was even the same MO: the wealthy charitable star who cared about kids and went out of their way to help them. Which was all just a front to get access to kids to abuse, while appearing to be above suspicion.

It’s just that some people were never convinced and always found them creepy and the adulation strange.

topnoddy · 09/01/2024 17:44

Jimmy Saville was never found guilty but everyone believes the stories abou what he got up to don't they

Jackson was a Fidder Kiddler , but this was the good old USA and you can pay off anyone who speaks up

KarenNotAKaren · 09/01/2024 17:45

StillStuckInTheShed · 09/01/2024 16:21

You realise James Safechuck is an actor, right?

He was a child actor. He started in a couple of commercials.

So does that mean he can’t have been sexually abused?

KarenNotAKaren · 09/01/2024 17:46

StopTheQtipWhenTheresResistance · 09/01/2024 17:36

Can we leave each other's kids out of this discussion?

No because it’s relevant to the people who are blind to obvious pedophiles

StopTheQtipWhenTheresResistance · 09/01/2024 17:47

@KarenNotAKaren It's not at all relevant and is completely unnecessary.

Alloftheskies · 09/01/2024 17:49

What it boils down to for me is 'would I be happy leaving my kids with Michael jackson' and the answer is no.
We will never know if he actually raped those boys or not but what I do know is that his behaviour that I have seen in interviews and recordings, towards those boys, was abusive anyway. The way he behaves romantically to them, spending years favouring them then dropping them when they reached a certain age.
I mean personally I do believe them. I work with sex offenders and it all absolutely fits for me. There's no doubt in my mind. But I do know there's also never going to be definitive proof.
He was very rich and powerful and to this day has legions of loyal fans.
Those poor boys will never get proper justice beyond some people here and there believing them. That is really sad.
I'm sad for child Michael Jackson too who was quite obviously abused and exploited himself. The whole thing is horrible. I can't listen to his music anymore

KarenNotAKaren · 09/01/2024 17:51

StopTheQtipWhenTheresResistance · 09/01/2024 17:47

@KarenNotAKaren It's not at all relevant and is completely unnecessary.

Asking a pedophile apologist if they would let a strange man share a bed with their child is absolutely relevant to decide why on Earth someone would defend a nonce

BigMandsTattooPortfolio · 09/01/2024 17:54

…then dropping them when they reached a certain age.

Indeed. This is yet another huge red flag.

Itsmychristmasdress · 09/01/2024 17:55

Jom222 · 09/01/2024 14:35

I prefer to look at it as a tragic situation overall. Michael's childhood was a shitshow and he was damaged terribly. Then he continued working and producing some of the best music of his time while becoming sicker as an adult.

Its not a question of innocence but putting it in the perspective that he was a very sick man. The worst part imo is that I'm sure his handlers knew what he was up and let him continue out of greed. Easier to 'manage' him and let him keep the money machine flowing for everyone involved and allow him to molest little boys than to speak out, possibly be destroyed for it and maybe not even see it stop.

I pity him but I also pity all the little kids he sexually molested, they deserved to be protected too. Cycles of violence and sexual abuse are generational-are any of those victims victimizing kids today? That troubles me a lot.

You are disgusting. Plenty of us have traumatic childhoods. We are not pedophiles. It s tragic for the victims. That is it.

StopTheQtipWhenTheresResistance · 09/01/2024 17:59

@KarenNotAKaren I have not seen a paedophile apologist on here, just people questioning whether it is true or not.

Daisybridge · 09/01/2024 18:00

As a parent would you accept money from someone if you thought they'd abused your child?

ZoeCM · 09/01/2024 18:01

KarenNotAKaren · 09/01/2024 17:44

Yes if you watch Leaving Neverland the mothers are interviewed.

Once accepts she fucked up big time and got swept away with the game and fortune and glamour. The other was entirely and utterly unremorseful and spoke in happy ways about Jackson. She then couldn’t understand why her DIL refused access to her grandson when the sex abuse allegations came out. They also interviewed the DIL who was horrified that her husband was ever allowed to be left with a stranger and made her feelings about her MIL very clear.

It's been a while since I saw Leaving Neverland, but from what I remember Joy Robson expressed at least some remorse. She said something along the lines of "Maybe one day I can forgive Michael if I realise he was sick, but forgiving myself is another thing." She also said that when Wade told her he had been abused, she admitted that she needed to take some of the blame for failing to protect him.

That being said, I don't think she fully understood quite how throughly she fucked up as a mother. As you say, she did seem shocked that her daughter-in-law wouldn't allow her in the house, suggesting she wasn't grasping how completely justified the anger was. The fact that she was even considering forgiving Jackson for sexually abusing her seven-year-old son disturbs me - I know people have different thresholds for forgiveness, but I got the impression she still had some residual fondness for him, even though their entire "friendship" had just been a ruse to get him access to her son. (Plus, I'm not keen on forgiving someone on another person's behalf - she wasn't the one he abused.) I got the impression she'd believed that Jackson was in love with her, actually.

StopTheQtipWhenTheresResistance · 09/01/2024 18:02

Daisybridge · 09/01/2024 18:00

As a parent would you accept money from someone if you thought they'd abused your child?

I would accept money as part of restitution from a criminal conviction but I would want them in prison to stop them doing it to any more children.

Alloftheskies · 09/01/2024 18:04

@StopTheQtipWhenTheresResistance
I mean... if you look at all the elements that are proven to be true and put them together... I just think people are being apologists when they try to explain all this in a way that doesn't add up to sexual abuse.
Letting kids sleep in your bed, showing them pornography, giving them alcohol, forming intense long standing friendships with them which are abruptly ended when they pass a certain age, paying off their parentorry but you really have to do mental gymnastics not to see grooming here

Northernsouloldies · 09/01/2024 18:06

Daisybridge · 09/01/2024 18:00

As a parent would you accept money from someone if you thought they'd abused your child?

Something definitely fucked up with that. If you've accepted payment you've essentially pimped out your own child.

alltootired · 09/01/2024 18:12

Don't be so disgusting.
What do you want them to do? Just forget about Jacksons rape of their son?

Alloftheskies · 09/01/2024 18:13

@Northernsouloldies
Have you seen that netflix documentary Abducted in Plain Sight?
Sheds some light on how naive and manipulable some parents can be.
There was much more naivety about grooming in the past too as it wasn't spoken about as openly.
I guess MJ just used his charm to convince these parents they were all friends like family.. and the money was him helping them out.. but obviously making it less likely they would ever turn on him

Northernsouloldies · 09/01/2024 18:18

alltootired · 09/01/2024 18:12

Don't be so disgusting.
What do you want them to do? Just forget about Jacksons rape of their son?

If that was aimed at me you're way off the mark. If my child was raped I'd rather have a prosecution than sordid hush money to keep quiet.

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.
Swipe left for the next trending thread