Meet the Other Phone. A phone that grows with your child.

Meet the Other Phone.
A phone that grows with your child.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Partner not wanting to split household bills

383 replies

mum1010219 · 20/11/2023 20:29

Me and my and are moving in together, but I have a son from previous relationship but the issue isn't he doesn't want to pay 50/50 on the bills as he will in hindsight be paying for my child, I only work one day a week just now due to childcare and son only being 3 ( he starts funded place in the new year) so he makes nearly 4 times a month what I do, I was saying it will be joint household bills if we all live together?
Made me feel awful as we are trying for a baby of our own and felt like he will never seen my son as his step child, he treats him like one but saying that hurt...

OP posts:
T1Dmama · 23/11/2023 10:22

LaurieStrode · 22/11/2023 23:58

Other than dignity, independence, and not taking advantage of taxpayers.

Working full time would just mean her child would barely see her, her wages would go on childcare and she’d still have to claim just as many benefits to live off till child starts school and she doesn’t need to pay for childcare.

Beezknees · 23/11/2023 10:33

usernamealreadytaken · 23/11/2023 10:20

OP has a three year old. UC website says "You will be expected to work up to 30 hours a week, or spend up to 30 hours a week on work-related activities such as applying for jobs." That's the point about short term support - if you have children aged 1-2 you are not required to work. You actually proved my point...

So that's what she will be currently doing - having to look for 30 hours of work as required.

Beezknees · 23/11/2023 10:34

usernamealreadytaken · 23/11/2023 10:20

OP has a three year old. UC website says "You will be expected to work up to 30 hours a week, or spend up to 30 hours a week on work-related activities such as applying for jobs." That's the point about short term support - if you have children aged 1-2 you are not required to work. You actually proved my point...

I didn't prove your point. You just contradicted your OWN point. You can't just sit around not working if you are required to be looking for work. The DWP will be coming down on the OP very soon.

Beezknees · 23/11/2023 10:37

usernamealreadytaken · 23/11/2023 09:44

"Would you say the same to a SAHM who was married?"

Yes, if they were claiming benefits.

So it's dignified not to work if you have a partner to financially and mentally support you, but not dignified not to work when you're completely alone with NO help from anyone else? Interesting.

usernamealreadytaken · 23/11/2023 10:44

Beezknees · 23/11/2023 10:34

I didn't prove your point. You just contradicted your OWN point. You can't just sit around not working if you are required to be looking for work. The DWP will be coming down on the OP very soon.

Which part of "the benefits system was designed as a stop gap for those needing support short-term, not as a lifestyle choice so they could choose to not work." don't you understand? OPs son is 3; she should be working not able to choose to not work because she doesn't fancy it - she's trying to avoid losing benefits when she will do so anyway, whether DP moves in or not. My point is that benefits are for short term situations, not a long term choice.

usernamealreadytaken · 23/11/2023 10:45

Beezknees · 23/11/2023 10:37

So it's dignified not to work if you have a partner to financially and mentally support you, but not dignified not to work when you're completely alone with NO help from anyone else? Interesting.

The dignity comes from who is paying for your choices - if someone is choosing to support you and you are choosing to be supported by a certain person then it's a mutual decision. If you are choosing to sit at home while some other people don't have that choice, then it's taking the mickey.

usernamealreadytaken · 23/11/2023 10:56

Santibbz · 23/11/2023 08:35

My partner had a 5 year old when I met him. When we moved in together it never even crossed my mind that paying half each would be unreasonable? The thought of that actually makes me abit nauseous. If I had said something, I wouldn’t have blamed him if he left me. When you date someone with a child you accept in the beginning that they are a package deal and know what you’re getting yourself into. If he’s with you, he’s also accepting to be in your child’s life. If he doesn’t want that then you should end things now before your child gets hurt, as it seems he might do down the line. Especially if you’re planning to have another child with him, your son will probably feel different and in the way given your partners attitude now.

Just out of interest, did DPs child live with you both full time?

usernamealreadytaken · 23/11/2023 10:58

T1Dmama · 23/11/2023 10:22

Working full time would just mean her child would barely see her, her wages would go on childcare and she’d still have to claim just as many benefits to live off till child starts school and she doesn’t need to pay for childcare.

But she would be keeping up workplace skills, her child would be socialising, and she would be contributing to somebody else's wages. Or we can keep importing people to do jobs while we all sit around with someone else paying us.

usernamealreadytaken · 23/11/2023 11:00

BlueEyedPeanut · 22/11/2023 21:52

Because this isn't a stepchild that only comes to stay one weekend a fortnight. This is the child's primary family. What happens when it comes to holidays? Dad pays for himself and 50% for his child, and mum has to pay for herself, 50% for one child and 100% for the other? And if mum can't afford that, what happens? Does one kid get to go but not the other? Ship him off to stay with daddy? You can not have a 2-tier system for siblings who live together. It's disgusting.

DC already has two parents to pay for his day to day living expenses; DP doesn't need to pay for that. If OP and DP have a child together, they'll work that out.

Beezknees · 23/11/2023 11:03

usernamealreadytaken · 23/11/2023 10:44

Which part of "the benefits system was designed as a stop gap for those needing support short-term, not as a lifestyle choice so they could choose to not work." don't you understand? OPs son is 3; she should be working not able to choose to not work because she doesn't fancy it - she's trying to avoid losing benefits when she will do so anyway, whether DP moves in or not. My point is that benefits are for short term situations, not a long term choice.

But she is NOT able to choose not to work! You quoted it yourself. She is now required to be looking for work. I was made redundant this year and the Jobcentre came down HARD on me to find work as quickly as possible. This will be happening to OP.

She would still get benefits anyway even working full time! As she would have to claim childcare costs and still be entitled to UC. I work full time, earn over minimum wage, have no childcare costs and cheap rent, and I still get £500 a month in UC (lone parent, one child).

Beezknees · 23/11/2023 11:06

usernamealreadytaken · 23/11/2023 10:45

The dignity comes from who is paying for your choices - if someone is choosing to support you and you are choosing to be supported by a certain person then it's a mutual decision. If you are choosing to sit at home while some other people don't have that choice, then it's taking the mickey.

I work full time and fully support single mums of young kids not working and getting benefits. Fuck all that "dignity" nonsense. Doing everything yourself is hard enough. Maybe if we shamed men into actually doing half the childcare more women in this situation would be able to work.

usernamealreadytaken · 23/11/2023 11:27

Beezknees · 23/11/2023 11:06

I work full time and fully support single mums of young kids not working and getting benefits. Fuck all that "dignity" nonsense. Doing everything yourself is hard enough. Maybe if we shamed men into actually doing half the childcare more women in this situation would be able to work.

I support single mums of young children being supported by the state too, but it can't be open-ended or indefinite. Perhaps as well as addressing the men not doing and paying for half, we should also address the fact that women are either choosing fathers who aren't really up to the job, or are actively choosing to have children when not in stable relationships. The welfare system has exploded the numbers.

Merryoldgoat · 23/11/2023 11:27

@Beezknees

I’m with you - of all of the things my taxes pay for this is one of the things I’m perfectly happy with.

Beezknees · 23/11/2023 11:57

usernamealreadytaken · 23/11/2023 11:27

I support single mums of young children being supported by the state too, but it can't be open-ended or indefinite. Perhaps as well as addressing the men not doing and paying for half, we should also address the fact that women are either choosing fathers who aren't really up to the job, or are actively choosing to have children when not in stable relationships. The welfare system has exploded the numbers.

None of that excuses men from responsibility. We should be forcing them ALL to take responsibility for children they create. Just like mothers have to.

usernamealreadytaken · 23/11/2023 12:06

Beezknees · 23/11/2023 11:57

None of that excuses men from responsibility. We should be forcing them ALL to take responsibility for children they create. Just like mothers have to.

We need for both parents to take responsibility for the creation and support of their children. Currently there's too much burden on the state, and not enough on both parents in some cases.

Santibbz · 23/11/2023 12:12

Yes, she has supervised contact every other weekend with her biomum for a few hours on the Saturday.

ginandtonicwithlimes · 23/11/2023 12:40

Beezknees · 23/11/2023 10:34

I didn't prove your point. You just contradicted your OWN point. You can't just sit around not working if you are required to be looking for work. The DWP will be coming down on the OP very soon.

Unless that is the reason she wants another in order to prevent the DWP coming after here. OP isn't work shy though. She just doesn't work that much.

Beezknees · 23/11/2023 13:28

ginandtonicwithlimes · 23/11/2023 12:40

Unless that is the reason she wants another in order to prevent the DWP coming after here. OP isn't work shy though. She just doesn't work that much.

Edited

If she was living with her DP she'd lose them anyway.

ginandtonicwithlimes · 23/11/2023 13:32

Beezknees · 23/11/2023 13:28

If she was living with her DP she'd lose them anyway.

Depends on his wage.

Grumpybear33 · 23/11/2023 14:20

Please do not move in with or have a baby with this man. If he does not see your 3 year old child as part of the family unit then you should not be with him. Your little boy comes first and I’d be worried about how he would be treated by this man. If you have another child then they should still be treated as equals by him. If you don’t think that would happen then you need to find someone who loves your son like his own.

thebestinterest · 23/11/2023 14:35

usernamealreadytaken · 22/11/2023 21:04

He doesn’t need to see OP’s DC as his; DC already has a dad. Partner will be step dad, and that’s a different dynamic to the actual parent.

Who on bloody earth complains about housing and feeding a child!? Nickel and dime for everything related to a child? Not just any child, but the child of your SO?

Sorry, that’s not right. I find it so classless.

usernamealreadytaken · 23/11/2023 15:11

thebestinterest · 23/11/2023 14:35

Who on bloody earth complains about housing and feeding a child!? Nickel and dime for everything related to a child? Not just any child, but the child of your SO?

Sorry, that’s not right. I find it so classless.

Ok, so in a few years when OP and DP have their own bio child, and DC1 is being taken out and treated by disney dad, how will bioDC feel? Will we expect DC1 dad to take their sibling out too? I've seen this situation with a friend who has children by 3 fathers, it's a bloody mess.

Lotty101 · 23/11/2023 18:58

I don’t think she want him to fund her child as in costs associated with the child such as their clothes etc. but does want a 50/50 split in rent and bills which would make sense because as 2 adults the costs should be split equally for the home and bills. Take into account she will lose a lot of the financial support she is currently getting as a single person (council tax reduction, any top up on wages, tax credits) and asking him to pay half is reasonable I think 🤔

Ronca70 · 23/11/2023 19:03

Dump him!

FiestyGemini · 23/11/2023 19:17

If someone shows you who they are believe them. I see him treating his child with you (if you have one together) different to "your child". That can cause major issues with the siblings in the future.