@fifteen and @ClareBlue no, I’m sorry, that’s just silly. Countries aren’t people and even if they were, Brexit has put the UK under the thumb of a government intent on institutionally gaslighting is on a grand scale with as few moderating influences as possible. It’s much more like choosing to flounce out of the local council where your opportunity to deliberate and equal vote with the other councillors isn’t good enough for you, you actively sought membership in the first place (it’s not like the EU love-bombed us), have consented to all the changes over the years in an active way, even if it means a compromise and the outcome has been an overall rise in standards of living.
One of the most pernicious bits of Brexit rhetoric is assuming the country is a homogeneous bloc of “the People”. It’s not. It’s not “national self-harm” because it’s a group of rich, powerful, corrupt people imposing these decisions on us according to their personal needs and goals, it’s them doing it to us. A country is a group of people who don’t generally have free choice as to where they’re born, with differing opinions, outlooks, priorities, needs. We weren’t oppressed in the EU, we were big power players with special privileges. To flounce out because you don’t want to abide by mutually agreed rules, causing a pretty nasty knock-on impact and diverting interest from what the government ought to be focusing on, which is improving the lives of the populace.
Also, the DV analogy is shite because a country isn’t going to be emotionally damaged by the decisions of an NGO. Btw, as a victim of DV it’s truly offensive as well. And every line @ClareBlue has written has been fed to them by an organisation which has hired consultants, advertisers, strategists specifically to play on people’s emotions and it is so, so tiring to hear the same shit for years on end when it’s nonsense.