@Maatandosiris, I know that I happen to be on the record as "it´s complicated!". And it is! But you might be making this a little "too complicated" (not meaning you, personally - I am perfectly aware this is "a thing" within this particular context!).
Saying "they have been fighting" for >2500 years over the land we now call "Israel" or "Palestine" is, technically, not wrong. But then, neither is the same claim wrong about Britain! The Celts, Romans, the Angles, the Saxons, the Vikings, Alfread the Great and William the Conquerer defeating Harold Godwinson in battle! Harald Hadrada. William Wallace. The Jacobean wars! The Irish "toubles" ... even the legendary King Arthur does not go far enough back (and he probably never existed as such - and yet: we do not actually know anything!). The Scotish independence movement! You could, quite legitimately, claim Britain "has been fought over "for >2500 years", and you[d be quite correct, too! Heck, Im saying this as a "probably a bit Celtic, Roman, Germanic, Viking, and Norman - itself French meets Viking" person.
The notion of "national souvereignty" would not have existed 500 BC, neither would the idea of such a thing as "national identity". We have the 19th century to "thank" for both ideas (that have, on the whole, not been particularly useful in the field of "how do we make sure we don[t bloody murder each other?"). Thats not to say prejudice against Jews did not exist before that - it did! It just is not useful to frame the whole thing as some kind of a national struggle since time immemorial (I do know there is a book by that title, I have read it, and I am not a fan).
We shall have to somehow arrive to a frame of reference that includes "what happened to my, my parents, and my grandparents" if we are going to fix this! For no other reason as "pure pragmatism and limitation of scope to the mere impossible". Do not be mistaken! This will be complicated enough, including survivors of both the Holocaust and the Nakba, as it still does!