@Amotherlife · Today 19:31
I feel sad for people who have babies in their 20s. It's like they're barely grown up and have had no time to work out who they are or what they want from life. My 20s were halcyon days - had loads of fun, met lots of people and had lots of great experiences. Accidentally got pregnant at 24, and though it wasn't an easy choice, and I did feel sad about it for a while, I terminated as I felt I'd just started my proper adult life, being only 3 months into my first professional post. (And no thoughts of marrying my then boyfriend.)
There are plenty of benefits and upsides to having children younger (I don't mean 16!) but like early to mid 20s. I would much rather myself, or a child of mine had 2 kids by 25-26, than not start til they're 43-44!
The kids will still be at school when you're 60! Errr no thanks! Also, when they have babies of their own, you'll very likely be 70-odd, and incapable of helping them because of declining health, poor eyesight, poor hearing, painful/stiff joints etc.
If THEY decide to leave having kids til 43-44, you'll be in your late 80s by the time your grandkids are born! (Or even worse, no longer here.)
Far better to have them at 23-24 than 43-44, for so many reasons. Even so, around 28-29 is probably the most ideal time IMO. But better 23-24 than 43-44 IMO.
To suggest that if you have children in your 20s, that's your life ruined is ludicrous, incorrect, and plain daft. Also, your '20s' is not the only decade you can have lots of fun and good times in.
And shocker! You can still have loads of fun, days and weeks away, and great times with children!!! I know! Weird right! 