Ghostytoasty · Today 14:24
It IS irreplaceable.
It is an irreplaceable icon, I agree.
You cannot replicate the ecosystem that an ancient tree is. A new tree will not have the same benefits. The new tree that grows will not provide the same habitat and the same important effects on the environment.
I have to say that I do not condone what was done at all.
But, a sycamore is an invasive species, which does not support the environment in the same way as native trees. Oaks, for example, support at least 200 types of insects and invertebrates, they encourages numerous useful fungi and provide food for all kinds of animals, such as squirrels and deer.
An oak is probably not suitable in the area, but an upland tree, such as a mountain ash may be, if they are going to replace it.