To not be surprised to see threads on LGB being questioned now?!

[SuperNewMe]

Just typed a reply and the thread disappeared quickly (makes a change as when it's trans related ones they stay?!)
So it's not a TAAT, it's just to say that after all the anti trans rhetoric you see on here sometimes, it comes as absolutely no surprise that there are now more threads attacking lesbian and gay couples ( not natural was the phrase used)
Not to mention one still on the go as far as I'm aware that refers to LGBTQ as "special rainbow people"
YABU you're imagining things
YANBU things seem to be ramping up against LGBT people in general
(I say this as someone who's straight and not trans)

If you want to ask me a question about a substantive issue please do

🤡

You've defended Stonewall and don't know who Nancy Kelly is?

Thanks for letting us know how little you are really invested in this issue.

I don’t know or care who Nancy Kelly is

She was the then head of Stonewall, who you leapt in to defend earlier. You're not very well informed about any of this, are you?

This demonstrates that the genderist position is homophobic.

Cross post

I believe she has since resigned but she was the CEO of Stonewall.

https://www.stonewall.org.uk/about-us/news/stonewall-welcomes-nancy-kelley-new-ceo

I don't not believe you do not know exactly what I am referring to but I'll help you. Do you think that lesbians who refuse to consider males in their dating pool, even if they identify as trans women are akin sexual racists or don't you?

I am asking plenty of questions on the substantive issue of the homophobia of trans ideology. The fact you are avoiding giving straight answers and are implying that same sex attraction is no different to other sexual preferences makes it clear that your position is homophobic.

Ah we're now on to the truth is transphobic.

Always get there in the end.

Read India Willoughby's tweets and you'll see.

He definitely thinks he's more of a woman than any biological one.

Ah, so 'transphobia' is any weak nonsense YOU consider it to be. People can't change sex. Trans people themselves talk about 'identifying' as the opposite sex. Saying men who identify as women, is grammatically correct and is the correct term. It's the correct gender technical definition. That is NOT 'transphobia'.

Trans ideology exists. Ask Richard Dawkins. It is an ideology. This is fact. That is NOT 'transphobia'.

If a male body is in a woman's space, regardless of how that male body identifies, it IS a potential threat to women as a MALE BODY with a PENIS AND TESTICLES. That is fact. That is NOT 'transphobia'.

Your 'definition' of transphobia is not the same as normal and reasonable people's.

I don’t think anyone I’d tired of homosexuals. I think it’s the alphabet spaghetti people are tired of.

Listen, I am in no way trying to deny the existence of biological differences that are influenced by sexual development, I’m just trying to express that these are not simple, binary, mutually exclusive or definitive, and when it comes to things like “gait”, there are huge environmental, cultural and social influences too and a lot of overlap . Here’s a simple graphic for you, this should not be controversial.

I do think at this point tandora is possibly dwelling under a bridge

I've noticed it, you're not crazy.
But then as a mother to a trans child, I'm pretty disgusted by the opinions of some on here anyway, so it doesn't surprise me.

This is a highly transphobic , largely incoherent and rant-y post.

I suspect to tandora even claiming we can tell the natal sex is transphobic. It's easy to claim transphobia when your definition includes not accepting twaw

Considering you don't even have a coherent idea of what transphobia actually is, I'll take your ignorant and bigoted judgement with the consideration it deserves.

It is nothing of the sort @Tandora

I know about the organisation and the work they do, I don’t keep score of the names of individuals . I’m interested in issues not personalities. If you are talking about the former CEO of stonewall and her comments about “sexual racists” then I already addressed them.

If men identify as men then they cannot be trans so men identifying as women is an accurate statement. You can substitute amle and female if it makes you feel better but a trans identity requires an acceptance of the material reality of biological sex.
Non binary actually requires a binary to make any sense at all.

Would gender ideology suit you better or would you still consider that transphobic?

Women are concerned about predatory males, a trans identity does not seem to reduce the rates at which men identifying as women commit sexual offences. We are concerned about men accessing single sex spaces however they identify. Framing women's concerns as transphobic is just pure misogyny.

You've managed to out yourself as a homophobe and a misogynist on a thread where you assume you occupy the moral high ground, how do you do that?

Disorders of sex development are indeed advanced biology but they don't disprove the basic facts of human reproduction. There are two gametes. Not one, not ten, not three.

You've managed to out yourself as a homophobe and a misogynist on a thread

oh bingo I’m a misogynist too 😂. I’m a rabid feminist.

I’m interested in issues not personalities.

It's not about her personality, it's about the general homophobia of the genderist worldview.

Your little squiggle for the ‘Advanced biology’ is hilarious, it has no substance.

And that’s because you can't change your sex, because that’s determined by your cells in your body.

Your little squiggle meme can’t change that basic fact.

Absolutely. Nothing transphobic or ranty at all about your factually correct post which the vast majority of the public would agree with.

'I’m a rabid feminist.' I've heard it all now. More like a comedian only your ideas are actually harmful to females rather than funny.

Centering men in your "equality" activism isn't feminism.