Meet the Other Phone. Flexible and made to last.

Meet the Other Phone.
Flexible and made to last.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

What are all pensioners getting another £300 this winter??

1000 replies

F0RBIDDENFRUIT · 25/08/2023 13:12

They are amongst the richest people in the country, yes there are poor pensioners but a lot of them are way richer than anyone else.

£300 more for energy, none of the old people I know need this, they all have more money than their children.

Just because they vote, that is the only reason they can be doing this.

OP posts:
Thread gallery
17
Soontobe60 · 25/08/2023 13:30

TheThinkingGoblin · 25/08/2023 13:28

There is a vast array of universal pensioner benefits.

Why should a wealthy pensioner get access to a free bus pass?

Why should a wealthy pensioner get free prescriptions?

These ALL need to be means tested now as a collective.

Its right that poorer pensioners should have help.

It is not right that wealthy pensioners get additional non-means tested benefits.

The UK is financially crippled because of an ageing demographic with too many universal pensioner benefits.

This has to come to an end.

Why should children of wealthy parents get free education? Free prescriptions? Free glasses? There are far more children in this demographic than pensioners.

Flopsythebunny · 25/08/2023 13:30

All the pensioners that I know do need the extra money, including my husband. It will mean that we can put he central heating on.
Our energy bills are already higher than normal because of my disabilities but because our income is a few pounds over the limit, we are not entitled to means tested benefits.
My pip is fully used up paying for care, incontinence supplies and other help that I need etc so I cannot contribute more. And before anyone says that the continence service will supply free, there is only one brand that I don't have a skin reaction to and they cannot provide them.
Many pensioners may be property rich, I but not cash rich.

Cinateel · 25/08/2023 13:31

I'm a pensioner. Trust me, I need it. We aren't all rich.

Soontobe60 · 25/08/2023 13:31

The ignorant, ageist comments on this thread make me embarrassed to be here!

tuvamoodyson · 25/08/2023 13:31

How can you know ‘most pensioners?’

SueVineer · 25/08/2023 13:32

Azaeleasinbloom · 25/08/2023 13:24

There are a fair few pensioners near me who rely on this to get them through a Scottish winter. They are not all rich, many are renters so not sitting on massive equity or savings.

Means testing per se probably costs more than it saves, but linking payment to other benefits , such as pension credits, housing benefit, attendance allowance, would make more sense to me.

Likewise with other freebies - I have a free over 60s bus pass - not sure that many people actually pay for bus journeys around here.

Means testing doesn’t cost more than it saves - that’s why working age benefits are means tested.

the answer op, is that the elderly vote (and often vote Tory). That’s why they as the richest group of people get generous universal benefits

HelpMeGetThrough · 25/08/2023 13:32

CremeEggThief · 25/08/2023 13:17

Get a grip, OP and stop begrudging old people £300. YABU.

Would you consider a person with an income if over £50k a year, mortgage and child free, with no additional debt, needing that 300 quid?

Tinkerbyebye · 25/08/2023 13:32

TheThinkingGoblin · 25/08/2023 13:28

There is a vast array of universal pensioner benefits.

Why should a wealthy pensioner get access to a free bus pass?

Why should a wealthy pensioner get free prescriptions?

These ALL need to be means tested now as a collective.

Its right that poorer pensioners should have help.

It is not right that wealthy pensioners get additional non-means tested benefits.

The UK is financially crippled because of an ageing demographic with too many universal pensioner benefits.

This has to come to an end.

@TheThinkingGoblin

why isn’t it right? Those wealthy pensioners are still paying tax, whereas those that survive on state pension only won’t be. So the ‘wealthy’ are still paying hundreds, if not thousands of tax each year, so get a return of £300

SueVineer · 25/08/2023 13:33

Cinateel · 25/08/2023 13:31

I'm a pensioner. Trust me, I need it. We aren't all rich.

No but many pensioners are extremely wealthy. Why should they get it

Flopsythebunny · 25/08/2023 13:34

SueVineer · 25/08/2023 13:32

Means testing doesn’t cost more than it saves - that’s why working age benefits are means tested.

the answer op, is that the elderly vote (and often vote Tory). That’s why they as the richest group of people get generous universal benefits

Nore do I know any pensioners who vote tory

SueVineer · 25/08/2023 13:35

Tinkerbyebye · 25/08/2023 13:32

@TheThinkingGoblin

why isn’t it right? Those wealthy pensioners are still paying tax, whereas those that survive on state pension only won’t be. So the ‘wealthy’ are still paying hundreds, if not thousands of tax each year, so get a return of £300

They pay less tax on their income than working age people and get generous universal benefits unlike working age people

OhhhhhhhhBiscuits · 25/08/2023 13:37

So you would be OK with it costing 1 billion to means test it to give out less than that? (Those are made up figures). When you add in all the admin ti means test these things its just not worth it to do. It would probably cost half of what they give out so the tax payer ends up paying nice. Where is the logic in that? What pensioners should do if they had any morals is if they don't need the £300 donate it to a food bank or a fuel poverty charity so they can help others.

SueVineer · 25/08/2023 13:37

Flopsythebunny · 25/08/2023 13:34

Nore do I know any pensioners who vote tory

whether or not you know them personally, pension age people are statistically more likely to vote conservative than any other demographic. That’s why the tories are keen to keep them happy.

drpet49 · 25/08/2023 13:37

TheThinkingGoblin · 25/08/2023 13:19

OP,

You are 100% correct.

The payment should be means tested. As should all pensioner benefits.

The time for universal benefits for pensioners has ended. The UK is too broke for this to be financially viable.

This

FictionalCharacter · 25/08/2023 13:37

porridgecake · 25/08/2023 13:23

I think the suggestion of means testing has been raised before and it appeared that means testing would cost the tax payer more than just making a universal payment.
I gave my energy payment to my local foodbank last winter. It seemed a reasonable option, although I am aware that that it isn't perfect.

Exactly this. Means testing would cost more than giving this relatively small payment to everyone. I'd rather give it to all of them than deny it to people in need.

fitzwilliamdarcy · 25/08/2023 13:38

When people use the word demographic they’re referring to a collective, a group of people. Not an individual MN poster. It is clear from statistics that the demographic of pensioners is Tory-voting. That doesn’t mean all pensioners vote Tory.

It is not ageist to point out who demographic groups vote for. Nor is it ageist to question whether a particular benefit is justifiable - any more than it would be ageist to question whether child benefits need to be adjusted.

TheThinkingGoblin · 25/08/2023 13:38

Tinkerbyebye · 25/08/2023 13:32

@TheThinkingGoblin

why isn’t it right? Those wealthy pensioners are still paying tax, whereas those that survive on state pension only won’t be. So the ‘wealthy’ are still paying hundreds, if not thousands of tax each year, so get a return of £300

This so economically and financially illiterate that I am honestly at a loss for words.

Pensioners are a MASSIVE sunk cost to the taxpayer due to the cost of their pensions and healthcare.

They pay in £x tax and get back 2x in benefits already (via pensions and specially healthcare)

So no, they do not deserve those universal benefits in any way, shape, or form.

EbiRaisukaree · 25/08/2023 13:39

This reply has been deleted

Withdrawn at OP's request

If you have even one child who has been state educated, you’ve already had more than you’ve put in.

Can I have some back? I’ve paid for them, and I don’t have any children of my own, so I think I’m owed. Ta.

Cakemakes · 25/08/2023 13:40

FictionalCharacter · 25/08/2023 13:37

Exactly this. Means testing would cost more than giving this relatively small payment to everyone. I'd rather give it to all of them than deny it to people in need.

Same here, some people are ignorant though and believe what the media tells them. I'm glad elderly people get this even if it means some who could cope without it get it. Just as I wasn't salty that those on benefits got cost of living payments when we didn't even though if you take into account the childcare and housing elements some have more money at the end of the month than we do.

Kendodd · 25/08/2023 13:40

Aren't pensioners the least likely group to live in poverty in the UK? They all (mostly) vote and tend to vote Tory, so that might be why. No political party dare piss them off.

DinnaeFashYersel · 25/08/2023 13:41

OP some points to consider.

Firstly its cheaper to get it to all pensioners than to means test it. Whilst universal provision means wealthy people benefit its the most cost effective way of getting money to those who need it.

20% of pensioners live below the poverty line and more than half of pensioners rely on benefits for their income.

Yes that means some well off pensioners will get it. But more importantly it means that those who need it will get it.

Pensioners incomes tend to be fixed. They can't run out and get a second job or work more hours to bring in more money.

Pensioners are more at risk from hypothermia and are more likely to switch off the heating to save money. The £300 is literally to to stop older people freezing to death.

There are lots of other benefits available to low income families with children. Rather than trying to kill off older people you would be better campaigning for a rise in benefits for low income families.

WeWereInParis · 25/08/2023 13:41

Why would means testing for this cost more than it saved, but means testing for eg child benefit is worth it?

Keyworks · 25/08/2023 13:41

This reply has been deleted

This has been deleted by MNHQ for breaking our Talk Guidelines.

Justanotherlurker · 25/08/2023 13:41

SueVineer · 25/08/2023 13:32

Means testing doesn’t cost more than it saves - that’s why working age benefits are means tested.

the answer op, is that the elderly vote (and often vote Tory). That’s why they as the richest group of people get generous universal benefits

That would explain why everyone was upset at the previous election when May wanted to means test the £300, scrap the triple lock and Corbyn and from what I remember a lot of the vocal left on here where vastly against.

IClaudine · 25/08/2023 13:42

Oh, goody. Another pensioner bashing thread.

Millions of pensioners live in relative poverty. They need the £300. It would cost a lot of time and resources to means test it. DWP struggles as it is.

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.
Swipe left for the next trending thread