Meet the Other Phone. Only the apps you allow.

Meet the Other Phone.
Only the apps you allow.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

who is being unreasonable? new job and children

692 replies

interestingly8 · 16/08/2023 07:27

Would like to keep this unbiased if possible.

Sarah and Ben have two children together and are separated. Ben is now married to Claire (B&C also now have young children of their own).

S&Bs children stay with B&C 2 nights one week and 3 the next currently. The week with 3 nights is over the weekend and the week with 2 is during the week.

Ben works, Claire is a SAHM and Sarah has been studying for the past number of years around her part time job.

Sarah has now qualified and is beginning a new job which will involve shift work meaning the her and Ben's children's normal contact schedule will need to change and follow Sarah's shift patterns rather than set days that they now have. This will inc upping contact to 3 nights every week whilst Sarah works. Ben is saying this is not possible as he's already arranged his work around the schedule they have had for years and cannot change this dependant on Sarah's shifts for that week. He has agreed to up contact to 3 nights per week but has said these must be set days.

Sarah has suggested Claire help if Ben is not around on one of the days, Claire has said no and agrees with Ben the contact schedule should remain the same as its what everyone has worked around for years Inc the children.

Who is being unreasonable?

Sarah for saying contact needs to follow her shifts instead of being set from now on and if Ben can't do that maybe Claire could help out. YANBU

Ben and Claire for insisting contact should follow the same schedule as normal and be set, not change week by week (although they do agree to up to 3 nights per week). YABU

OP posts:
cruffinsmuffin · 16/08/2023 08:45

When you see posters saying their ex husband can't have the kids because of a change in shift pattern / job - the comments are full of people saying it's his responsibility to sort childcare on his time - it's the exact same here. Contact doesn't need to follow someone's choice to study for an accept a job with shift patterns.

Ben has said he'll have the children more time, but it needs to be set times which makes complete sense.

Ben and Claire can't run their lives based on Sarah's shift pattern - the kids also need stability and to know which home they'll be in when, changing it every week isn't going to create a stable comfortable atmosphere. It also won't work for Ben and Claire to be unable to plan their own lives never knowing what's going on with the children being there or not.

RudsyFarmer · 16/08/2023 08:45

I don’t think anyone is right or wrong.

its reasonable to want to change long standing agreements that no longer work with your work schedule but it’s also reasonable to want long standing childcare agreements to stay in place, particularly if you’ve changed your life to fit around those times/days.

The problem is how you go about finding childcare, I assume some of the childcare required will be overnight?

interestingly8 · 16/08/2023 08:45

Also I have no issue with exes wife being a SAHM, I was when ours were tiny too and I understand that time can be precious and that it's not sitting around doing nothing.

OP posts:
Beseen22 · 16/08/2023 08:46

I'm guessing Sarah is a nurse and if so it's pretty much impossible to get set shifts. She could go bank after a year and work around Ben but for her newly qualified year she would need some support.

So on the outset Sarah is being unreasonable expecting people to pander to her shifts...but

  1. She probably doesn't have much choice
  2. Her new qualification will allow her more earning potential and therefore a better life for the kids. That they had together.
  3. The benefits of shift work are that you don't work 5 days a week. So if Ben had a little grace on giving some flexibility with the mother of his children it could work in his favour as she would have more opportunity to be at school events/do drop offs/help him if he ever needs it.
  4. It's potentially not a long term problem.

Also people saying mum working shifts is bad for the children because its disrupting their routine is crazy. 90% of registered nurses in England are women and a lot of them will be mothers. Are we all creating unstable households and damaging our children's routine? I work my shifts in so I can do every drop off and pick up and be at every school event and every club and extra curricular activity and playmate my kids desire albeit often with very little sleep.

Wenfy · 16/08/2023 08:46

interestingly8 · 16/08/2023 08:43

Thanks for the replies.

Okay I will admit I am Sarah in this. I don't have a partner, although did have a fiance at the time I started studying who had said we'd work it out together hence why my ex wasn't a massive factor in the discussions. I realise now that was probably naive.

I asked exes wife if she would help in the sense of collecting from school and having until ex got home or dropping off ect. She has said no as its not a set schedule so she would find it difficult to make plans for her own children and doesn't want to have to be back for school collections on differing days. I understand that I guess. I don't dislike exes wife, she has a career herself which I presume she may return to at some point.

Ex and I did not split just to any infidelity. He did not leave me for his current wife although they did meet not long after we separated. I actually left him, he wasn't abusive but we didn't get along the relationship was not good. I do think he can be unsupportive purposefully sometimes.

That does mean when the shoe’s on the other foot and Claire goes back to work, you don’t need to help them either. What career did you go into? Some like nhs / social care etc can get discounted wrap around care.

yogasaurus · 16/08/2023 08:46

Flakey99 · 16/08/2023 08:44

Ben’s a shit father because presumably he carried on working and let Sarah do the hard graft when the kids were babies, promising her that he will support her to retrain and build her career when they’re in school.

Then he had an affair and now has another woman stuck at home bringing up his second batch of kids.

Why can’t the younger housekeeper/nanny/wife look after all the kids?

Wtf. There was no affair?

Why can’t the younger housekeeper/nanny/wife look after all the kids
Some posters cannot help but project their on bitterness onto threads.

1967buglet · 16/08/2023 08:46

But Ben is also being a bit unreasonable to say no, nothing can change: is Sarah supposed to stay part time forever and keep contact the way it is to facilitate her ex’s career and lifestyle? She’s presumably studied and taken this job to better her career, finances and lifestyle for the children’s sake, not for lols. Ben must be doing all right if he can afford four children, a SAHM and an ex working only part-time. Perhaps he can dip into that to help his ex improve her lot to his level.

Yup. Ben has been able to call all the shots, and frankly Claire knew she was marrying a man who had children. Claire might have to get used to being a more full time stepmom. Sarah has a right to enjoy the fruits of her labours, no, not say, oh well, I studied all that time for a more professional job, and so I need to give that up for Ben and Claire’s sake. That’s horse manure.

DrSbaitso · 16/08/2023 08:47

Flakey99 · 16/08/2023 08:44

Ben’s a shit father because presumably he carried on working and let Sarah do the hard graft when the kids were babies, promising her that he will support her to retrain and build her career when they’re in school.

Then he had an affair and now has another woman stuck at home bringing up his second batch of kids.

Why can’t the younger housekeeper/nanny/wife look after all the kids?

You've literally made half of this up and it isn't true.

1967buglet · 16/08/2023 08:47

Beseen22 · 16/08/2023 08:46

I'm guessing Sarah is a nurse and if so it's pretty much impossible to get set shifts. She could go bank after a year and work around Ben but for her newly qualified year she would need some support.

So on the outset Sarah is being unreasonable expecting people to pander to her shifts...but

  1. She probably doesn't have much choice
  2. Her new qualification will allow her more earning potential and therefore a better life for the kids. That they had together.
  3. The benefits of shift work are that you don't work 5 days a week. So if Ben had a little grace on giving some flexibility with the mother of his children it could work in his favour as she would have more opportunity to be at school events/do drop offs/help him if he ever needs it.
  4. It's potentially not a long term problem.

Also people saying mum working shifts is bad for the children because its disrupting their routine is crazy. 90% of registered nurses in England are women and a lot of them will be mothers. Are we all creating unstable households and damaging our children's routine? I work my shifts in so I can do every drop off and pick up and be at every school event and every club and extra curricular activity and playmate my kids desire albeit often with very little sleep.

100 percent agree.

Sierra26 · 16/08/2023 08:48

Goldbar · 16/08/2023 07:41

Slightly different perspective.

Sarah presumably now has a chance of giving her and Ben's kids together a substantially higher standard of living in the past. Ben is being selfish and putting their kids' interests last in refusing to discuss how they could make it work.

I agree Claire shouldn't have to care for her stepkids alone, but Ben and Sarah should come to an arrangement which allows Sarah to have a full career just like Ben does. It might mean not this job, but another job, or Ben contributes towards extra childcare, but Sarah should be able to work full-time too. Ben needs to engage with Sarah so they both have a chance of a good career... he's the kids' parent too.

This

MorningOclock · 16/08/2023 08:48

Flakey99 · 16/08/2023 08:44

Ben’s a shit father because presumably he carried on working and let Sarah do the hard graft when the kids were babies, promising her that he will support her to retrain and build her career when they’re in school.

Then he had an affair and now has another woman stuck at home bringing up his second batch of kids.

Why can’t the younger housekeeper/nanny/wife look after all the kids?

Erm are you OK?!

DumDeeDoh · 16/08/2023 08:48

I think it is perfectly fair for the father to ask for set days. An ever changing schedule is hard to manage and make plans around.

Fallulah · 16/08/2023 08:48

Cyllie33 · 16/08/2023 08:04

Ha! I’m most surprised by all the Claires! I assumed the OP was Sarah from the way it was written!

If so, congrats on the new job OP! But, yes, I agree with pp that the onus is on Sarah to arrange childcare, although it would be nice to have some flex from B&C. It’s hard.

I too thought the OP was Sarah!

Naunet · 16/08/2023 08:48

1967buglet · 16/08/2023 08:46

But Ben is also being a bit unreasonable to say no, nothing can change: is Sarah supposed to stay part time forever and keep contact the way it is to facilitate her ex’s career and lifestyle? She’s presumably studied and taken this job to better her career, finances and lifestyle for the children’s sake, not for lols. Ben must be doing all right if he can afford four children, a SAHM and an ex working only part-time. Perhaps he can dip into that to help his ex improve her lot to his level.

Yup. Ben has been able to call all the shots, and frankly Claire knew she was marrying a man who had children. Claire might have to get used to being a more full time stepmom. Sarah has a right to enjoy the fruits of her labours, no, not say, oh well, I studied all that time for a more professional job, and so I need to give that up for Ben and Claire’s sake. That’s horse manure.

and frankly Claire knew she was marrying a man who had children

Yes, she knew she was marrying a man who had kids, I don’t think the marriage licence had a Free Childcare clause. But both PARENTS knew what they were signing up to when they had kids, being fully, legally responsible for them.

BellaJuno · 16/08/2023 08:49

Flakey99 · 16/08/2023 08:44

Ben’s a shit father because presumably he carried on working and let Sarah do the hard graft when the kids were babies, promising her that he will support her to retrain and build her career when they’re in school.

Then he had an affair and now has another woman stuck at home bringing up his second batch of kids.

Why can’t the younger housekeeper/nanny/wife look after all the kids?

Maybe you should re-train too, as an author of fiction 🤣

Allsweep · 16/08/2023 08:49

interestingly8 · 16/08/2023 08:43

Thanks for the replies.

Okay I will admit I am Sarah in this. I don't have a partner, although did have a fiance at the time I started studying who had said we'd work it out together hence why my ex wasn't a massive factor in the discussions. I realise now that was probably naive.

I asked exes wife if she would help in the sense of collecting from school and having until ex got home or dropping off ect. She has said no as its not a set schedule so she would find it difficult to make plans for her own children and doesn't want to have to be back for school collections on differing days. I understand that I guess. I don't dislike exes wife, she has a career herself which I presume she may return to at some point.

Ex and I did not split just to any infidelity. He did not leave me for his current wife although they did meet not long after we separated. I actually left him, he wasn't abusive but we didn't get along the relationship was not good. I do think he can be unsupportive purposefully sometimes.

Would Claire be more willing if the kids were in after school club so that she didn't have to be available at school pick up time?

This may not be practical but just wondered if it was an option. Ours will allow you to book on the day for slightly more.

CoffeeIsTheAnswer1 · 16/08/2023 08:49

I think Sarah is unreasonable. It's unreasonable to expect people to change their lives around an unpredictable schedule all the time. I agree with Ben that set days are necessary so that they can plan and have their own lives.

It's unreasonable to ask Claire to pick up the kids from school on an unpredictable schedule for the same reason. She needs to be able to plan and this might not work if she suddenly has to fit something else in. But that's often the lots of SAHMs. People assume they have nothing better to do, which is just not true.

I think Sarah should have three set nights a week with Ben and organise childcare for the nights that are hers. That's what working parents do if they can't be there.

RaidFlySpray · 16/08/2023 08:49

Idk but amazed that there are 3 different spellings of Claire on the first page of this thread. Who knew it was so difficult?!

Pacificisolated · 16/08/2023 08:50

Shift work is hard in a two parent family. It is incompatible with single parenting unless you have a grandparent willing to take on a quasi parent role.

Sarah was massively unreasonable to retrain for a job that required shift work. As the other parent I would detest never being able to plan my life more than a roster ahead. And I would massively resent it if the roster was that of my partners ex!

Puffypuffin · 16/08/2023 08:50

Caprisunny · 16/08/2023 07:31

So Sarah got this job and assumed her exs partner would pick up the slack?

This is what I thought. Sarah should never have even suggested this. B & C have already agreed to increasing days and I'm sure they're happy to do that, but I totally understand them wanting set days rather than not knowing when it will be.

YourNameGoesHere · 16/08/2023 08:51

Given your update I have to wonder is the finance no longer in the picture at all as in you've split with this person and at what stage did that happen as surely that would have been the time to look into alternative childcare arrangements rather than waiting until you'd qualified?

What are your shifts likely to look like going forward and what arrangement would work best for you and the children because it's totally reasonable for Ben and Claire to want a consistent arrangement and it's much fairer on the children.

CoffeeIsTheAnswer1 · 16/08/2023 08:51

Allsweep · 16/08/2023 08:49

Would Claire be more willing if the kids were in after school club so that she didn't have to be available at school pick up time?

This may not be practical but just wondered if it was an option. Ours will allow you to book on the day for slightly more.

Wouldn't after school club pick up be right on dinner time? That's a pain of a time to have to do that, especially with two very young children. If Ben can do it as the father, good on him, but Claire doesn't have to make her life more difficult.

drpet49 · 16/08/2023 08:52

Flakey99 · 16/08/2023 08:44

Ben’s a shit father because presumably he carried on working and let Sarah do the hard graft when the kids were babies, promising her that he will support her to retrain and build her career when they’re in school.

Then he had an affair and now has another woman stuck at home bringing up his second batch of kids.

Why can’t the younger housekeeper/nanny/wife look after all the kids?

@Flakey99 why are making shit up? There was no affair. Bitter much??

arethereanyleftatall · 16/08/2023 08:52

I cross posted, like many of us.

Op - your eldest is 11 and presumably secondary in September? I can tell you that they change within literally weeks of starting year 7. They will become independent overnight. Ok, you can't leave them overnight, but in a few short weeks, you won't have to worry about your eldest.

Overthebow · 16/08/2023 08:52

Sarah should have taken into account the shift work before starting studying and discussed with Ben then. It’s not fair that Ben should have to follow Sarah’s shift patterns, although he should take on more of the childcare on set days. Sarah will need to sort childcare around the set days.