Meet the Other Phone. A phone that grows with your child.

Meet the Other Phone.
A phone that grows with your child.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

eating food without permission

606 replies

thecatswhiskrs · 20/06/2023 12:25

This is a long-running argument in our house and I'd love to get a sense from others of whether I (and my kids) are just being unreasonable....

DH has a habit of mooching around the kitchen looking for food. He feels that anything in the kitchen is (and should be) fair game. He gets very upset when we shout at him for eating something that we feel he shouldn't have or something that we feel he should have checked first.

Examples:

  • A child will have cooked some cookies for themselves and others to eat. The leave the tray on the counter to cool anticipating that lovely treat later and then come back to find their father has eaten a third of the tray before they've even offered.
  • A child will have made some food for their lunch. There will be leftovers and they will have mentally allocated these for their lunch the next day in school. They leave it in the fridge or somewhere to cool, come back and it's gone.
  • I am making dinner. It's nearly time to eat. I've planned the meal so that everyone has (for instance) 3 sausages and two bits of bacon. He comes in and nicks two bits of bacon from the pan right before we are about to eat.

He argues that he has paid for the all of the food in the kitchen and shouldn't have to ask for permission to eat it. If we have plans for some of it and haven't allowed enough to share then it's our fault for not making enough (we should just make lots more of everything to allow for others having some). He feels that we are not being generous and that (in spite of his best efforts to model generosity) we are all just being mean.

Are we being unreasonable (or just plain miserable!) to want him to at least check whose food it is and whether it has a destination before just eating it??

OP posts:
ScribblingPixie · 22/06/2023 15:26

mandlerparr · 22/06/2023 15:06

3 sausage links have 27 grams of protein. And that is little american breakfast sausage. I think you alls are way bigger.

Two slices of decent bacon = 12g protein.

Zebedee55 · 22/06/2023 15:26

In my house, food is for anyone that wants it....🙄

L3ThirtySeven · 22/06/2023 15:27

Goldbar · 22/06/2023 15:25

Just pointing out that there are lots of circumstances in which it is inappropriate (and could be categorised as "nicking") for a family member to take food.

Lots? The foods on your plate and you’ve popped to the loo in the middle of eating is only 1 example and silly one at that.

Goldbar · 22/06/2023 15:32

@L3ThirtySeven. The way I read the OP's posts, the children probably don't need to ask - they apparently understand and respect the implicit norms around food and food sharing which apply in the OP's house. The husband is the only one who (arguably knowingly) tramples over them and leaves others short.

Goldbar · 22/06/2023 15:33

L3ThirtySeven · 22/06/2023 15:27

Lots? The foods on your plate and you’ve popped to the loo in the middle of eating is only 1 example and silly one at that.

I can think of many other examples - cakes for bake sales, food for entertaining, snacks for friends - where this would also be the case. If you can't, then you must lack imagination.

L3ThirtySeven · 22/06/2023 15:34

literalviolence · 22/06/2023 15:22

Oh I agree. It's 37 who thinks it's outrageous to ask him not to take food prepared by others for specific purposes. OP is really clear that there's plenty of food in the house and no one is trying to restrict him from eating that.

Ive not said that at all. I think it is outrageous to control food to the point that family members think they own certain bits of food, and that the DH, and only the DH, must ask his wife and children for permission before eating food.

That’s what the thread is about eating food without permission and what the OP wants want him to at least check whose food it is and whether it has a destination before just eating it??

There are better systems to ensure fair sharing than to require one family member to ask permission of all other family members.

L3ThirtySeven · 22/06/2023 15:35

Goldbar · 22/06/2023 15:33

I can think of many other examples - cakes for bake sales, food for entertaining, snacks for friends - where this would also be the case. If you can't, then you must lack imagination.

Well, that’s already been covered earlier in the thread and they also do not need a system that requires anyone asking permission.

literalviolence · 22/06/2023 15:37

L3ThirtySeven · 22/06/2023 15:25

I have understood the OP. I have answered all your questions.

We serve ourselves. The last person has never once gone without any dish within a meal because we cook enough for the whole family, based on how much the whole family as a group tends to eat.

My system is nothing alike. I do not cook 3 of this and 2 of that per person ever. I do not count or measure how much each person eats ever.

The OP isn’t allowing self regulation. She is allocating portions on a per person basis and getting upset when her DH eats a bit more than what she allocated (sausage and bacon example). She has also taught her children to not communicate, but to ‘mentally allocate’ leftovers as in planning but not communicating to anyone that the leftovers are for a lunch and then the child gets upset when the leftovers get eaten.

Her solution to the not communicating proactively, is to make her DH, and only her DH, ask permission before eating.

Her system is nothing like my system.

You've answered nothing. You've said you sometimes eat it all and get feedback of 'more next time' but are refusing to say how the amount that there is, bearing in mind it's not enough, gets allocated. But I give up. You can't get blood out of a stone and I don't think you're really interested in discussing. Otherwise you'd answer the questions.

Goldbar · 22/06/2023 15:37

Maybe the reason the husband and no one else is expected to ask permission is because the rest of the family don't go around NICKING EACH OTHER'S FOOD.

L3ThirtySeven · 22/06/2023 15:44

Goldbar · 22/06/2023 15:32

@L3ThirtySeven. The way I read the OP's posts, the children probably don't need to ask - they apparently understand and respect the implicit norms around food and food sharing which apply in the OP's house. The husband is the only one who (arguably knowingly) tramples over them and leaves others short.

I read the OPs posts very much that she thinks it is her house her rules and she has set up an us vs him dynamic along with showing signs of food control that are, in my opinion, toxic and dysfunctional.

I read her posts and it shows that her and the DC thinking that they don’t need to communicate, that it’s all on him to ask them each and every time. To go bowl in hand and beg, essentially.

It is equally his house, and so any rules regarding food are fair game for negotiation. I wouldn’t say he is trampling and leaving anyone short. From the Op he ate 1/3rd of one tray cookies. He ate his 2 bites bacon from the pan (stayed within the bacon limit his controlling wife had put on him). He ate leftovers that a child had not communicated with anyone that they wanted them for their lunch.

Hes not the problem. It’s the lack of communication to effectively share that is the problem. The OP thinking that she needs to control food further by making herself and the children gatekeepers of all food (DH must check with them first..) is not a good solution.

L3ThirtySeven · 22/06/2023 15:47

Goldbar · 22/06/2023 15:37

Maybe the reason the husband and no one else is expected to ask permission is because the rest of the family don't go around NICKING EACH OTHER'S FOOD.

You can’t nick food, that’s disordered thinking to my mind. How does one “nick” the two bits bacon your wife was going to put on your plate by eating it out of the pan? How does one “nick” leftovers that a child had merely thought they might like for their lunch? How does one “nick” cookies that were literally cooked for you and everyone else?

L3ThirtySeven · 22/06/2023 15:49

literalviolence · 22/06/2023 15:37

You've answered nothing. You've said you sometimes eat it all and get feedback of 'more next time' but are refusing to say how the amount that there is, bearing in mind it's not enough, gets allocated. But I give up. You can't get blood out of a stone and I don't think you're really interested in discussing. Otherwise you'd answer the questions.

I havent refused, I’ve said truthfully there is no allocation of food at the individual level. There simply isn’t. You just don’t like my answers, you can only conceive of one way of thinking, one way of problem solving. You have a one track mind.

Phoenixfire1988 · 22/06/2023 15:50

Tw@ behaviour
If he eats 2 pieces of bacon and he was getting 3 he then only gets 1 if he gripes and if he gripes remind him he already ate the other 2 he would of had and you won't be taking food out of the children's mouths or making yourself go hungry because he's a greedy POS .my partner will always check if something is spare before eating it as do the kids and eating the cookies the children have made without being offered them is just plain cruel

L3ThirtySeven · 22/06/2023 15:52

You've said you sometimes eat it all and get feedback of 'more next time'
Actually, I haven’t said this. I’ve said there has always been enough for all, even when we eat all the food made for a meal. The feedback has been more of this/less of that when it comes to specific dishes within a meal. Like more sausages or less broccoli. Balancing the meal. No one eats less than they need.

literalviolence · 22/06/2023 15:53

L3ThirtySeven · 22/06/2023 15:49

I havent refused, I’ve said truthfully there is no allocation of food at the individual level. There simply isn’t. You just don’t like my answers, you can only conceive of one way of thinking, one way of problem solving. You have a one track mind.

Your obfuscation are genuinely hilarious!!! Say you cook 12 sausages. There are 4 people. Person 1 to 3 take 4 each. What about person 4? Don't hide behind 'I always cook enough' cos you've already said sometimes you get feedback that more is needed. Sure next time you might cook 16. But what about this time? How did you .are sure everyone got some? Basically if you don't formally serve up, it's because you've taught people tp be considerate. That's all OP is asking.

Kbaxburn · 22/06/2023 16:00

Girl, sounds like you need to bake some cookies with some chocolate ex-lax in them... then when he eats 1/3 and is in the bathroom... tell him he really shouldn't have eaten those cookies and had he asked you would have warned him. But I'm a Southern American woman, we get payback.

L3ThirtySeven · 22/06/2023 16:03

literalviolence · 22/06/2023 15:53

Your obfuscation are genuinely hilarious!!! Say you cook 12 sausages. There are 4 people. Person 1 to 3 take 4 each. What about person 4? Don't hide behind 'I always cook enough' cos you've already said sometimes you get feedback that more is needed. Sure next time you might cook 16. But what about this time? How did you .are sure everyone got some? Basically if you don't formally serve up, it's because you've taught people tp be considerate. That's all OP is asking.

I’m sorry you are having trouble understanding the way things work in my family. Truly.

That scenario you posit is not going to happen, or at least has never once happened in my 50+ yrs on the planet, because we already know that my family tends to eat 12 sausages or less as a whole group. The extra hungry are offset by the less hungry. There is no way the first 3 people will take all the sausages because we just don’t eat that much, not even on our hungriest days. We just don’t. So no one is consciously holding back to leave sausages for others behind them and we do not run out. The feedback of a bit more of this/less of that is more when trying new meals or when the household size changes- visits or a DC going off to Uni. There is a learning curve where we adjust and usually the default is to make too much food and the adjust downwards. And as I said, the left over food is never wasted.

The OP isn’t asking for her DH to be “considerate” she is asking Are we being unreasonable (or just plain miserable!) to want him to at least check whose food it is and whether it has a destination before just eating it??

She is asking whether it is reasonable for her and their children to gatekeep the food from her DH/their father.

L3ThirtySeven · 22/06/2023 16:07

*please note that “12 sausages” is just a illustrative example.

bussteward · 22/06/2023 16:10

L3ThirtySeven · 22/06/2023 15:47

You can’t nick food, that’s disordered thinking to my mind. How does one “nick” the two bits bacon your wife was going to put on your plate by eating it out of the pan? How does one “nick” leftovers that a child had merely thought they might like for their lunch? How does one “nick” cookies that were literally cooked for you and everyone else?

Eating it out of the pan: rude. Sit down and be served/be passed the dish. It’s nicking.

Leftovers: literally leftovers of food the child themselves made. So not last night’s dinner, up for grabs by anyone. Not ingredients that anyone could use. Something someone made for themselves. Nicking.

Biscuits: on a cooling rack so not yet up for grabs, child who baked them may well have wanted to present them, invite people to eat them, show some pride in their achievement. He denied them that, and took 1/3 of what was there when there are four people in the house. Nicking part of someone’s share and robbing a kid of the opportunity to go “Look! I made this!”

L3ThirtySeven · 22/06/2023 16:19

bussteward · 22/06/2023 16:10

Eating it out of the pan: rude. Sit down and be served/be passed the dish. It’s nicking.

Leftovers: literally leftovers of food the child themselves made. So not last night’s dinner, up for grabs by anyone. Not ingredients that anyone could use. Something someone made for themselves. Nicking.

Biscuits: on a cooling rack so not yet up for grabs, child who baked them may well have wanted to present them, invite people to eat them, show some pride in their achievement. He denied them that, and took 1/3 of what was there when there are four people in the house. Nicking part of someone’s share and robbing a kid of the opportunity to go “Look! I made this!”

We are less formal/more relaxed when it comes to food. The OP’s DH may be from a similar background to mine. It’s an approach that deserves fair consideration by the OP.

placemats · 22/06/2023 16:20

His excuse for eating his children's lunches and bakes, plus from the pan was he's paying for the food and therefore entitled to eat it. Simply not on.

loislovesstewie · 22/06/2023 16:24

For goodness sake! Leftovers! Where are the leftovers from? A previous meal presumably, so unless told that the child was going to eat them, and that doesn't seem to have been conveyed, up for grabs for anyone. No one in this family seems to communicate, and no one is a mind reader.

TBean23 · 22/06/2023 16:30

If the roles were reversed and the husband made all the food and required his wife to ask permission to eat anything, we'd call him controlling. She's controlling. Why is she dictating how much food each person is allowed to eat? He shouldn't have to ask to eat anything in the house, just like she shouldn't. If she made something that's specifically for the kids' lunch or treats to take to school/work or whatever, then she needs to communicate that to him. If he still eats it, then yes he's being a jerk. You can't "mentally allocate" food for lunch the next day and expect everyone else in the house to read your mind. No wonder he's upset with you.

WickedSerious · 22/06/2023 16:44

LuciferRising · 22/06/2023 09:13

People are going eat what they need, no more. - you think this is the case in our society?

That's why everyone's so slim and gorgeous.

jeffgoldblum · 22/06/2023 17:33

Yanbu op 👍 , hope it all goes well, I'm unwatching this thread now as it's been completely derailed by one prolific poster.

Swipe left for the next trending thread