I can directly compare with an exam. Same school, same teacher. Said I was lazy, even when I always came top. I never knew what I wasn't doing that she thought I should be. I finished work quickly and spent a lot of time staring at the map on the wall. Anyway, we had an exam, called the Common Entrance, though I don't believe it was. We sat a mock version, and Mary (not her name) came top, and I came one mark less. Then we had the real one, and I came top. and Mary came one mark less. She was usually Form Leader and went on to become Head Girl, and a very nice girl she was. On Prize Day, I got a great big cup big enough to hold a champagne bottle. One day when I wasn't in the room Miss told the rest of the class that I shouldn't have got it because I was lazy. I had never had a prize before, my younger sister had one every year, except the Mrs D one which she only awarded one year to me.
It was only when I was marking SATS and hunting through to make sure I had given every child every point they deserved that I realised that Miss must have spent ages on Mary's and my papers hoping to award the prize to Mary, so I absolutely did win.
And she left a legacy. Every year when I got my OU results, I dreaded opening them because I was afraid of failing. Although I usually did rather well.
I am, as I mentioned, 77. For a school which claimed to develop each girl's potential fully, to leave me with this sort of stuff is ridiculous. So thinking that children get over failing easily is easy for people who only see it once, but where it is reinforced year after year it soaks in deeply. You can see it would be bad for reading and maths, but not sport. Being told it is a fatal flaw in character, not trying hard, being lazy, when you don't experience that...Horrible.