Why so much fuss over Stella Braverman?

[lastminutepanicking]

I’m just wondering who on earth cares? Can’t understand why this is such big news.

Perhaps we do though?

Well she’s asking you to perhaps comment on the tories in power so clearly not.

I’m still not entirely clear why criticising the tories automatically means your Labour either?

You don't know anything about her politics? Do you live under a rock?

Oh dear. Am I kink shaming?

That's not exactly what I was thinking, although there are perhaps some similarities.

Does Suella approve of kink?

Yes, yes I would. Along with anyone who tried to defend them. I may even be inclined to add a few more descriptors as well.

Cornettoninja
I don’t know what kind of shenanigans go on at your place of work but you’ve just presented it as something within the realms of normal. It’s really, really not

It was a hypothetical question - but apparently not that unusual;
https://www.walesonline.co.uk/news/uk-news/many-people-watch-porn-work-23911542

Cornettoninja
I’m still not entirely clear why criticising the tories automatically means you're Labour either?

Oh, so you're not keen on Labour either - good for you!

@Clavinova your not keen on Labour?

You know i would never have guessed that.

Is it because they are not as hate filled as the Tories?

The fact that many people watch porn at work doesn't make it right, does it? It's disgusting. The vast majority of porn is deeply exploitative. Describing the people who watch it as 'scum' is pretty accurate. It would be a dealbreaker for me in any relationship I might have in the future.

How else though will Tories check they know what a woman is and for?

pointythings
The fact that many people watch porn at work doesn't make it right, does it?

Obviously not.

Me too. I can’t imagine living with a man who thinks it’s OK. I’m quite shocked by Clav’s insouciance above it. I thought she was better than that.

About it, even.

Blossomtoes
Me too. I can’t imagine living with a man who thinks it’s OK. I’m quite shocked by Clav’s insouciance above it. I thought she was better than that.

You are gaslighting me - I haven't said it's ok at all - quite the opposite. I said I wouldn't label Neil Parish as 'scum' - it's not a word I use.

Is gaslighting posting more and more irrelevant links?

jgw1
Is gaslighting posting more and more irrelevant links?

No - I don't think so.

What shall we call it then?

What shall we call it then?

Qi?

We can call it Qi if you like.

@Clavinova do you have any Qi showing what a good job Braverman is doing?

You're right it isn't.

The problem is you have done the typical tribal thing and assumed everyone moaning about current government is a Labour supporter and so instead of a greasing the current issues you attack Labour with whataboutery.

Whereas in reality some of us are swing voters and voted for this current bunch of incompetents.

In fact - that's what's more disappointing. When people you elected yourself behave this way.

As a swing voter you're actually doing nothing as an avid Tory to persuade me to vote Tory again. You've done nothing to show why this log can improve my life or country.

Instead you've shown my why 25 years ago if I'd voted Labour then I shouldn't have. (I wasn't in the country so didn't vote at all!)

From a swing voters point of view your actually an advert for voting Labour

Not just Telegraph readers either, but a tiny tiny minority of Telegraph readers, being the sub-subset who care enough about SB to contribute to the vote on her .

'Is gaslighting posting more and more irrelevant links?'

Clav consistently posts relevant links to refute the often silly comments on these threads.

I know it must sting, it is horribly inconvenient but it is indeed more 'relevant' than rattling on like a broken record about kids birthday parties.