Meet the Other Phone. Protection built in.

Meet the Other Phone.
Protection built in.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Why so much fuss over Stella Braverman?

930 replies

lastminutepanicking · 22/05/2023 17:03

I’m just wondering who on earth cares? Can’t understand why this is such big news.

OP posts:
Thread gallery
11
Scautish · 22/05/2023 17:26

Schroedingersimmigrant · 22/05/2023 17:09

This is exactly why we have government we have🤷🏻

Absolutely spot on. It’s so depressing.

HelpMeGetThrough · 22/05/2023 17:27

dariane · 22/05/2023 17:10

You mean Sue Ellen? She's broken the ministerial code (probably) again. She should be sacked

Eh?

MasterBeth · 22/05/2023 17:27

Minecraftfield · 22/05/2023 17:12

Agree, I don't get the fuss really. She was still going to do the course, just wanted special treatment and they said no.
It's not like the chap who got his wife to take the points for him.
Disclaimer: don't know anything about her politics

Clearly not.

The chap who got his wife to take the points for him (Chris Hune) was a cabinet minister who was jailed for eight months for perverting the course of justice.

I agree that Braverman's "crime" is not as serious (it's not an actual crime) but she has broken the ministerial code, which means she should resign. As has been said above, it's a clear abuse of power.

Handsnotwands · 22/05/2023 17:27

because the very least we should be able to expect from members of our ruling party is that they at least try to keep within the boundaries of the law

AnarchoTyrannosaurus · 22/05/2023 17:29

Aaron95 · 22/05/2023 17:19

I really dislike her and her morals but in thie particular case it is a storm in a teacup. She asked if she could attend the speed awareness course privately for security reasons. She was told no and therefore decided to take the penalty points instead.

Asking if she could attend a course privately doesn't seem unreasonable for someone who is the Home Secretary.

That sounds reasonable to me.

Rhondaa · 22/05/2023 17:32

It's the hysterical media, like Boris and the cake all over again.

She asked if she could do the speeding course as a 1 to 1, was told no so paid the fine. It is such a non story

Hiphopopotamus · 22/05/2023 17:32

Bloody hell I do think sometimes there should be a test you have to take before you vote.* Terrifying that my vote counts exactly the same as people who have no idea what the Home Secretary is called or anything about her politics or even what the hell is going on at the moment. For the love of God please go and inform yourselves at least a little before you put a mark in a box in the next election.

*said with tongue firmly in cheek - I’m aware of how ethically problematic this would be…

AnarchoTyrannosaurus · 22/05/2023 17:33

How on earth could she have taken a speeding awareness course with members of the public. There would be risks around security, not to mention her being recorded / taped. She should have the choice to do the speed awareness course the same as anybody else, but for the reasons above she had no choice but to take the points instead.

TheHandmaiden · 22/05/2023 17:35

@Janiie - that missed the bit that was wrong. She can do a one on one course, but she cannot use civil servants to arrange it or work out how it is done.

Suella Braverman needed a lawyer. Apparently being one herself wasn't enough to work out what the law was or the rules that apply to her as a Minister.

Fififafa · 22/05/2023 17:36

Even other Tory MPs are speaking out against her. This was tweeted on 22nd April by William Wragg MP..…

“This evening, having kept quiet for a while, I was struck by the lamentable hopelessness of the Home Secretary, remembering particularly her first week or so as a Member of Parliament
^^
My clearest recollection of our Home Secretary’s legal acumen came from day one as an MP. We had a presentation from @ipsaUK
^^
Her question to @ipsaUK concerned whether a speeding ticket incurred during the course of parliamentary duties could be claimed on expenses. Rather embarrassed, the representatives from @ipsaUK said no.
^^
Thank goodness our Nation has been blessed with such a fine Attorney General and Home Secretary. Carry On! 🇬🇧”

…..So not only is she lacking in morals and empathy, she’s incompetent too.

goldfootball · 22/05/2023 17:39

so no chance of her ever doing an MP surgery if she can’t be around the public… bit of a shame for her constituents. I didn’t realise we’d got to the point where cabinet members literally could not interact with the public for their own safety.

Nat6999 · 22/05/2023 17:39

Because she shouldn't think she is above the law & should take her punishment the same as anyone else. Can you imagine if you or I asked for a 1:1 speed awarement course? We would get told no way, why should it be different for her just because she is Home Secretary.

Hippyhippybake · 22/05/2023 17:39

Given the vile memes that were created of her laughing in front of Auschwitz (her husband is Jewish) I can see why she might want to enquire if there’s an alternative to attending a speed awareness course with two dozen or so people. It has subsequently been confirmed that yes one on one speed awareness courses are available to high profile individuals so I can’t see why simply enquiring about this from her staff is such a big deal.

MissyB1 · 22/05/2023 17:40

Rhondaa · 22/05/2023 17:32

It's the hysterical media, like Boris and the cake all over again.

She asked if she could do the speeding course as a 1 to 1, was told no so paid the fine. It is such a non story

To people with miserably low expectations of their Government I imagine it is a non story. Some of us expect better.

TheHandmaiden · 22/05/2023 17:44

Tbh it's such a low level legal error re the law, the Ministerial code and the greed "put my fine on exoenses" that she seems incurably dim witted for a barrister.

She should really go for being incompetent

IamAlso4eels · 22/05/2023 17:45

AnarchoTyrannosaurus · 22/05/2023 17:33

How on earth could she have taken a speeding awareness course with members of the public. There would be risks around security, not to mention her being recorded / taped. She should have the choice to do the speed awareness course the same as anybody else, but for the reasons above she had no choice but to take the points instead.

She's the Home Secretary, she shouldn't have been speeding in the first place.

It wasn't an in-person course either, it was over Zoom/Teams so security risk would have been minimal. She just didn't want people to know she'd been caught speeding.

Typical Tory do as I say, not what I do.

VioletMountainHare · 22/05/2023 17:47

katmarie · 22/05/2023 17:25

Firstly, she broke the law by speeding. Personally I think that those who make the laws should be held to the highest standards. Expecting them not to brak those laws, even the most insignificant seeming law, is the least we can expect from them.

Secondly, she sought to use her position as an MP/Government minister to obtain special treatment, firstly by trying to get the civil service to set up a one on one speed awareness course, and when the CS said no, using one of her own special advisers to try and achieve the same thing.

MPs are obliged to uphold the impartiality of the CS, asking them for special favours puts them in a very difficult position. She knows that. She of all people should be well versed in the ministerial code by now.

And thirdly, rather than just admit she shouldn’t have done it, she maintains that she did no wrong. It’s disappointing she is so severely lacking in integrity.

PoePoePoePoePoe · 22/05/2023 17:47

@Janiie she asked her civil servants to intervene to make it happen - she didn’t sort it herself! These are public servants. I’m a civil servant - I’m not employed to dig my boss out of shit she got into in her private life FFS 🙄.

She also got one of her senior civil servants to lie about the fact that she had even been caught in the first place.

Its very much not a fucking non story 🙄🤬🤦‍♀️.

Rhondaa · 22/05/2023 17:49

'And thirdly, rather than just admit she shouldn’t have done it, she maintains that she did no wrong. It’s disappointing she is so severely lacking in integrity.'

A speeding fine. It wasn't armed robbery y'know. Think most folk who have been caught by a speed camera still manage to have a bit of integrity. How desperate are labour to make this out to be such a drama.

Hippyhippybake · 22/05/2023 17:49

She didn’t ask anyone to “intervene”, she simply asked her staff whether it was possible to do a one on one course. When she was told they couldn’t help, she elected to pay the fine and take the points.

Moonmelodies · 22/05/2023 17:50

It's mostly because she's not white.

AnarchoTyrannosaurus · 22/05/2023 17:50

goldfootball · 22/05/2023 17:39

so no chance of her ever doing an MP surgery if she can’t be around the public… bit of a shame for her constituents. I didn’t realise we’d got to the point where cabinet members literally could not interact with the public for their own safety.

It's hardly the same is it. At the very least the phones whipped out to record a public figure under these circumstances. Which isn't on. But it would happen.

Understandably I think MPs need to be careful around security and how they manage that, particularly after cases like David Amess. There are very real risks and the vitriol and hatred towards SB is clearly huge.

Rhondaa · 22/05/2023 17:50

Hippyhippybake · 22/05/2023 17:49

She didn’t ask anyone to “intervene”, she simply asked her staff whether it was possible to do a one on one course. When she was told they couldn’t help, she elected to pay the fine and take the points.

This!

Unclench for goodness sake.

Firstmonthfree · 22/05/2023 17:51

If she has to go because as home sec she is supposed to uphold high moral standards they surely the Archbishop of Canterbury needs to go too?

goldfootball · 22/05/2023 17:52

Tbh of she was photographed doing a speeding course I think that would be… fine?