“A great time” would cover it.
—————-
Tbh I don’t care if I’m considered selfish. I’m happily childfree, and I’m sure as shit not inclined to have children I don’t want because someone else thinks I have a moral duty. They’re welcome to knock themselves out with that one.
I also have pets, because I want pets. I don’t have children because I don’t want children. As such, pets can hardly be considered ‘replacements’ for something that isn’t wanted in the first place.
I do think the Pope is conflating ‘issues’. More and more people are actively choosing to be child free, rather than feeling forced to not have children they otherwise want. Governments can look to support the latter, without coercing the former.
also, the fact that there’s an aging population in the west does not change the fact that the world is indeed overpopulated. I also question to logic in continuing to feed a pyramid scheme in the hope of holding off collapse, rather than looking to reconsider the viability of the system itself.
The Pope though, is the head of an institution that thinks it should have a say when it comes to women and our reproductive choices. And by ‘say’ I mean it’s an institution that wants to prescribe womanhood, regardless of what women themselves may want. Not exactly a bastion of female power or freedom.