Meet the Other Phone. Child-safe in minutes.

Meet the Other Phone.
Child-safe in minutes.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Thread gallery
66
HadalyEve · 06/05/2023 16:50

cakeorwine · 06/05/2023 16:44

Do the police even have the power to turn a blind eye? They’re not supposed to pick and choose when to enforce the law, and yet by saying the police have massively fucked up by arresting people trying to get arrested you are acting like the police should turn a blind eye

If the police saw a device that could be used for locking up / or could just be there for another purpose, what do you think they could have done?

Having the power of arrest does not mean that power has to be automatically used.

It’s clear when you have a length of chain and a padlock or a bike lock at a protest what your intentions are. Anything you needed to lock up as transport (bike, motorcycle) and then walk to join a protest in Trafalgar Square, you would have done so and left it behind. You only need those items in Trafalgar Square for one thing only, and that is now a criminal offence.

GroomedForSerfdom · 06/05/2023 16:51

I don’t understand. Person A carries a prohibited item to a protest with illegal intent to use it and with the intent to get arrested. If they intended to get arrested, they obviously must have flaunted it in front of the police “look what I got ha ha, you going to arrest me?”

How do you know they intended to use it? Could have popped to b&q on the way and planned to paint the hallway when they got home. (I'm being facetious but the idea that someone could be arrested for what someone else assumes you might do is frightening to be honest).

Puzzledandpissedoff · 06/05/2023 16:52

why dont they drag climate change protestors off the road then-thats a disruption isnt it

In theory they now can, but whether it'll happen - or if it does, so instantly - remains to be seen

Ditto protests from those with a protected characteristic; I wonder if the "quite right too" views would be quite so numerous then?

HadalyEve · 06/05/2023 16:52

Just4ThisThread · 06/05/2023 16:49

The police have no problem turning a blind eye to the many dangerous individuals in their organisation but someone with a megaphone is to be arrested? Fuck me, how are people ok with this?

Don’t even start me on the nonsense posts re horses being spooked so police would get in trouble, does anyone genuinely think the police are the slightest bit arsed about being trouble? In trouble with who?

So you don’t want the police to stop turning a blind eye to stuff? You think that past corruption means we absolutely should have present and future corruption. Fuck me indeed.

GrouchyKiwi · 06/05/2023 16:52

My initial thought was that Republic had done this deliberately (made sure they were arrested) so as to make a bigger impact from their protest.

There were still plenty of people in the crowd who were protesting against monarchy, and the cameras made sure to pick them out.

The new laws are bloody concerning, though.

user10675345 · 06/05/2023 16:52

Just4ThisThread · 06/05/2023 16:49

The police have no problem turning a blind eye to the many dangerous individuals in their organisation but someone with a megaphone is to be arrested? Fuck me, how are people ok with this?

Don’t even start me on the nonsense posts re horses being spooked so police would get in trouble, does anyone genuinely think the police are the slightest bit arsed about being trouble? In trouble with who?

https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2021/mar/13/as-the-sun-set-they-came-in-solidarity-and-to-pay-tribute-to-sarah-everard

Travis1 · 06/05/2023 16:53

HadalyEve · 06/05/2023 15:06

They can

But they don’t, interesting choices they make isn’t it

HadalyEve · 06/05/2023 16:54

Travis1 · 06/05/2023 16:53

But they don’t, interesting choices they make isn’t it

They couldn’t then, they can now. This is the first protest since the new law came into effect.

Just4ThisThread · 06/05/2023 16:55

HadalyEve · 06/05/2023 16:52

So you don’t want the police to stop turning a blind eye to stuff? You think that past corruption means we absolutely should have present and future corruption. Fuck me indeed.

So, you’re ok with one rule for them and another for the public?

tofutti · 06/05/2023 16:56

Interesting what the BBC about crowds being smaller than expected. Suggests Charles is not as popular as the Queen (although the rain would have put people off too).

cakeorwine · 06/05/2023 16:57

From the BBC

"The Metropolitan Police confirmed several arrests were made at demonstrations in the capital.
The force said "lock-on devices" - which protesters can use to secure themselves to things like railings - had been seized.
But Republic said officers had "misconstrued" straps meant to secure their signs in place."

Police use their common sense all the time. It's not turning a blind eye or corruption. It's using their common sense to deescalate situations.

OP posts:
Fererr · 06/05/2023 16:57

It’s bad. As others have said on there, this is on the government passing two deeply troubling acts, the Policing Act, 2022 and now just v recently the Public Order Bill, 2023 which both curb the right to protest. The UNCHR issued a press release a few days ago on the Public Order Bill that has just passed saying:

“The Public Order Bill, which has now been passed by Parliament in the United Kingdom, is deeply troubling legislation that is incompatible with the UK’s international human rights obligations regarding people’s rights to freedom of expression, peaceful assembly and association, UN High Commissioner for Human Rights Volker Türk warned on Thursday.”

https://www.ohchr.org/en/press-releases/2023/04/un-human-rights-chief-urges-uk-reverse-deeply-troubling-public-order-bill

UN Human Rights Chief urges UK to reverse ‘deeply troubling’ Public Order Bill

GENEVA (27 April  2023) - The Public Order Bill, which has now been passed by Parliament in the United Kingdom, is deeply troubling legislation that is incompatible with the UK’s international human rights obligations regarding people’s rights to freed...

https://www.ohchr.org/en/press-releases/2023/04/un-human-rights-chief-urges-uk-reverse-deeply-troubling-public-order-bill

Puzzledandpissedoff · 06/05/2023 17:07

This is the first protest since the new law came into effect

It is, yes - and whenever there's another and police don't step in quite so fast (or even not at all) people are likely to want to know why not

Which could get quite interesting ...

Againstmachine · 06/05/2023 17:11

GroomedForSerfdom · 06/05/2023 16:51

I don’t understand. Person A carries a prohibited item to a protest with illegal intent to use it and with the intent to get arrested. If they intended to get arrested, they obviously must have flaunted it in front of the police “look what I got ha ha, you going to arrest me?”

How do you know they intended to use it? Could have popped to b&q on the way and planned to paint the hallway when they got home. (I'm being facetious but the idea that someone could be arrested for what someone else assumes you might do is frightening to be honest).

It is very worrying that people are calling everyday objects prohibited items.

Whether the police think you are going to use them is irrelevant they aren't illegal and the police thinking you might commit a crime, should never be enough to arrest you.

No wonder there is no trust in the Met and the general police force they are a utter joke.

HadalyEve · 06/05/2023 17:13

Just4ThisThread · 06/05/2023 16:55

So, you’re ok with one rule for them and another for the public?

What are you on about?

HadalyEve · 06/05/2023 17:13

Puzzledandpissedoff · 06/05/2023 17:07

This is the first protest since the new law came into effect

It is, yes - and whenever there's another and police don't step in quite so fast (or even not at all) people are likely to want to know why not

Which could get quite interesting ...

If police don’t step in, if

HadalyEve · 06/05/2023 17:14

cakeorwine · 06/05/2023 16:57

From the BBC

"The Metropolitan Police confirmed several arrests were made at demonstrations in the capital.
The force said "lock-on devices" - which protesters can use to secure themselves to things like railings - had been seized.
But Republic said officers had "misconstrued" straps meant to secure their signs in place."

Police use their common sense all the time. It's not turning a blind eye or corruption. It's using their common sense to deescalate situations.

Secure their signs to what? People’s hands?

Aintshesweet · 06/05/2023 17:20

love Ian Hislop

Arrested for holding a banner - can't ruin a big day, can we...
Postapocalypticcowgirl · 06/05/2023 17:26

ejbaxa · 06/05/2023 09:30

It’s not on to protest at the coronation. It’s a useless and embarrassing action today and I’m glad these people were arrested. I’m indifferent to the monarchy, but I do think that it was right to arrest these people. They are in a tiny minority and they are not being hurt or oppressed by having Charles as king.

48% is a tiny minority? That's how many people are against the royal family now.

It's not a niche position any more.

Postapocalypticcowgirl · 06/05/2023 17:27

Anyway, if you arrest people for peaceful protest, in this scenario, surely in the future it makes people less likely to work with police AND actually means there is no incentive to protest peacefully other than your own conscience. IMO, it makes violent protest more likely, because if you're going to be arrested anyway.

And BTW no official reason has been given for their arrest.

Postapocalypticcowgirl · 06/05/2023 17:29

polkadotdalmation · 06/05/2023 09:38

@MyUsernameIsBetterThanYours They are overriding the rights of people who go to see an event they want to enjoy. Megaphones and placards that lock their view pisses a lot of people off.

Why don't they start a political republican party?

There is no legal right to enjoy a specific event. In a democracy, there should be a right to protest.

A political party will never be able to get rid of the monarchy.

vera99 · 06/05/2023 17:29

Noted.

Arrested for holding a banner - can't ruin a big day, can we...
countrygirl99 · 06/05/2023 17:29

@HadalyEve you haven't answered my question about what country an averagelying wealthy 64yo its no family ties can move to easily. As you insisted it's easy to emigrate Im sure you have some suggestions seeing as you think I shouldjust leave the country.

Roussette · 06/05/2023 17:34

HadalyEve · 06/05/2023 16:43

And no one was arrested for holding a banner. It’s click bait to generate faux outrage over something that did not happen.

Incorrect.

A man was led away and detained for holding up a blank piece of A4 paper when K&W went on walkabout a few months back. There is video footage of it.

2ManyPjs · 06/05/2023 17:37

A group that volunteer with the Westminster Night Safety team were reportedly arrested by the MET Police at 2 am and held for 14 hours. Kept in handcuffs for 3 hours. And their offence? Being in possession of rape alarms to hand out to women.

Swipe left for the next trending thread