Meet the Other Phone. Protection built in.

Meet the Other Phone.
Protection built in.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

So Camilla is Queen now?

269 replies

cakeorwine · 24/02/2023 07:10

Headlines in the papers talking about what the Queen said yesterday at a reception.

I thought we had a King and a Queen Consort.

Phillip wasn't a King.

AIBU to think calling Camilla the Queen instead of the Queen Consort is going too far?

OP posts:
BMW6 · 24/02/2023 10:20

ConfusedNT · 24/02/2023 10:17

I'm imagining a scenario where you wake up from a brain injury and they want to test your memory and they ask 'who is the current monarch'

The patient answers 'Queen Elizabeth' and everyone nods, then realises that's wrong then realises they haven't got a clue if the patient has memory issues or if it's a perfectly normal answer

Very true and 😁 😂 😀 🤣

QuietlyConfident · 24/02/2023 10:21

ConfusedNT · 24/02/2023 10:17

I'm imagining a scenario where you wake up from a brain injury and they want to test your memory and they ask 'who is the current monarch'

The patient answers 'Queen Elizabeth' and everyone nods, then realises that's wrong then realises they haven't got a clue if the patient has memory issues or if it's a perfectly normal answer

Allegedly the "who is the Prime Minister?" test failed in Thatcher's later years because even the most severely impaired patients could still say "Maggie!/Thatcher!" depending on their politics. When Major was appointed it failed again, as perfectly competent individuals were drawing a blank.

LaMarschallin · 24/02/2023 10:23

QuietlyConfident

That's exactly what I was reminded of - it was amazing how long that lasted in people's minds.

TangledWebOfDeception · 24/02/2023 10:26

LibrariansGiveUsPower · 24/02/2023 10:13

You remember Queen Elizabeth the Queen mother right? She was Queen, and remained Queen after her husband died, just with the addition of Queen Mother.

If Charles passes before Camila she will still be Queen Camilla - who knows what they’ll add, the King Stepmother seems a mouthful.

They won’t need to add anything. She’ll just be Queen Camilla, since no one will confuse her with Queen Catherine.

Elizabeth was Queen Mother because she had the same name as Elizabeth II so it was necessary to distinguish between them.

ConfusedNT · 24/02/2023 10:26

QuietlyConfident · 24/02/2023 10:21

Allegedly the "who is the Prime Minister?" test failed in Thatcher's later years because even the most severely impaired patients could still say "Maggie!/Thatcher!" depending on their politics. When Major was appointed it failed again, as perfectly competent individuals were drawing a blank.

Tbf there have been times over the last few years I probably would go through 2 or 3 names before I get to the right one

I also keep forgetting Liz Truss's name, it's just blanking on me for some reason, i have issues with names anyway, and so I keep having to go 'The ones that's not as good as a lettuce' which would have surely convinced doctors I had brain issues in that scenario 😂

WorkingFromHomeRocks · 24/02/2023 10:30
  1. Queen Consort sound stupid
  2. I don’t give a shit anyway
mrstea301 · 24/02/2023 10:30

BillyMack · 24/02/2023 07:11

Any examples of this? I’ve only ever seen her referred to as Queen Consort

I've just seen an advert for the 'Queens reading room' - looks like some sort of literary festival that's being put on at one of the palaces

royalreadingroom.uk/?fbclid=PAAab9Y2Thl_EeLc9DxM0XKNyCm0FULwoa6wZaixulxKUaNHRmSEByGX-qeHU

TangledWebOfDeception · 24/02/2023 10:47

ConfusedNT · 24/02/2023 09:56

Because its a woman, a 'fallen' woman at that in some peoples eyes so obviously it's dar to inconvenient for them if they can instead insist on calling her consort to emphasise her lesser status

I really don’t think that’s why. To begin with they were worried about a backlash from unhinged Diana worshippers, that’s all. And more recently it may also have been due to The Queen having meant Elizabeth II for 70 years, so that most people would automatically think of her when it’s said.

She’s not ‘lesser’ in any way for being Queen Consort - A Queen by marriage to a King is always Queen Consort. They’re just using the title of her position rather than the usual title a Queen Consort uses (just plain Queen).

ConfusedNT · 24/02/2023 10:53

TangledWebOfDeception · 24/02/2023 10:47

I really don’t think that’s why. To begin with they were worried about a backlash from unhinged Diana worshippers, that’s all. And more recently it may also have been due to The Queen having meant Elizabeth II for 70 years, so that most people would automatically think of her when it’s said.

She’s not ‘lesser’ in any way for being Queen Consort - A Queen by marriage to a King is always Queen Consort. They’re just using the title of her position rather than the usual title a Queen Consort uses (just plain Queen).

I know she would be a queen consort regardless

But as you say, it's the unhinged Diana worshipers that seem to be so focused in her being 'consort'

Hence my point it's because she is a 'fallen' woman so they want to try to make her sound lesser by insisting on the consort bit being used because they think it makes her sound less that Queen would by itself

I understand the press using it to start off with to make things less confusing but I am talking about the people now who are adamant it should remain Queen Consort because otherwise its 'going too far'

The only way it can be going too far is if those people think Queen sounds 'more' than Queen consort - hence they want her to have the 'lesser' title

MrsSkylerWhite · 24/02/2023 10:54

Good. I’m not a monarchist but I like her. They should have been allowed to marry decades ago.

TangledWebOfDeception · 24/02/2023 11:27

ConfusedNT · 24/02/2023 10:53

I know she would be a queen consort regardless

But as you say, it's the unhinged Diana worshipers that seem to be so focused in her being 'consort'

Hence my point it's because she is a 'fallen' woman so they want to try to make her sound lesser by insisting on the consort bit being used because they think it makes her sound less that Queen would by itself

I understand the press using it to start off with to make things less confusing but I am talking about the people now who are adamant it should remain Queen Consort because otherwise its 'going too far'

The only way it can be going too far is if those people think Queen sounds 'more' than Queen consort - hence they want her to have the 'lesser' title

Oh I see what you mean!

I think people need to give up on the sainthood of Diana thing, tbh. She was clearly a lovely person in some ways, and deeply flawed in others.

WinterMusings · 24/02/2023 11:41

Maireas · 24/02/2023 07:32

You always get that with royalty threads. I'm never sure what the point is.

Im sorry you so often struggle with threads.

The point is that the OP ASKED if she was being unreasonable. People are invited to reply.

which is entirely different than threads about the Royals in that topic.

@cakeorwine YABU for the reasons that have already been stated.

YA(also) BU to start a thread about it without looking at the history/tradition/protocol around it.

Years ago, I too would have bristled, but actually although I don't agree with all the carry on when Diana was alive, I don't agree with him basically being made to marry Diana and I think Camilla has been good for Charles & he'll be a much better King for it.

As for the 'Prince Charles, I mean King'. My brain is struggling with anything other than The Queen, and startles when King is mentioned. I'm sticking to Charles. King Charles just does not seem right. King William even less so, a man you've seen as a newborn, just can't be right! (I hope for both Charles & Williams sakes it's a long way off!)

ConfusedNT · 24/02/2023 11:48

TangledWebOfDeception · 24/02/2023 11:27

Oh I see what you mean!

I think people need to give up on the sainthood of Diana thing, tbh. She was clearly a lovely person in some ways, and deeply flawed in others.

Absolutely, I totally agree

Topseyt123 · 24/02/2023 11:53

Of course Camilla is the Queen. Why on earth wouldn't she be?

Nobody in history has ever continually been called Queen Consort. Anyone who thought Camilla would always be referred to as Queen Consort has been living on another planet.

As for this idiotic and ridiculous deification of Diana, it really must stop! She was no saint and she has been dead for over 25 years now. Move on FGS.

whumpthereitis · 24/02/2023 11:58

EthicalNonMahogany · 24/02/2023 08:26

If you're the sort of person who cares about monarchy and marriage and tradition you're also the sort who thinks divorce is Not On, especially for ruling classes. It is convenient for the patriarchy to make us punish divorced women especially, and encode marital fidelity into the rules of who's allowed to have all the jewels and castles. It means the patriarchs are less likely to accidentally bring up someone else's genetic child..

Hence, if you're happy for one family to have All the Things, you also on some level have bought the narrative that a lady with someone else's kids shouldn't get to have All the Things. Hence PC's second wife, who was having it away with him all along, doesn't get to be Queen. Hth

Queen Anne Boleyn did. As did Queen Jane Seymour and Queen Katherine Howard.

Hell, the Church of England was established because Henry VIII wanted to get a divorce, so it’s not like ‘an adulterer shouldn’t be head of the Church of England’ stands up to any scrutiny either.

maddy68 · 24/02/2023 12:01

Well she is isn't she?

Genevieva · 24/02/2023 12:10

All monarch's wives are Queen, including divorcees. In the 12th century Eleanor of Aquitaine, Queen of England and wife of Henry II was a divorcee, having previously been unhappily married to Louis VII for 15 years. She married Henry as soon as her separation was formalised.

Technically the first marriage was annulled, but this was merely political / theological. It was, in modern terms, a divorce. The marriage produced 2 children.

So, there is precedent. Why anyone expected her to be called anything else is beyond me. There is no precedent for that.

Luckypom · 24/02/2023 12:25

@BooCrew

This! What a saint…👌ready to bury head lol but oh forgot - I’m not bothered about the Queen of hearts

TiredandLate · 24/02/2023 12:28

This does not impact my life in any way so I really don't care what anyone calls her. I'm sure she never gives me a second thought either.

MrsDanversGlidesAgain · 24/02/2023 12:40

Because its a woman, a 'fallen' woman at that in some peoples eyes so obviously it's dar to inconvenient for them if they can instead insist on calling her consort to emphasise her lesser status

Consort just means wife of the king, as opposed to Queen Regnant, i.e ruling in her own right. It isn't a lesser title because she didn't give birth to the heir to the throne, it isn't a lesser title because she's a 'fallen woman,' it's because she's the wife of the king and Queen Consort is her official title - which will no doubt be dropped in time once everyone's got used to the fact we now have a king, not a queen regnant.

ConfusedNT · 24/02/2023 12:47

MrsDanversGlidesAgain · 24/02/2023 12:40

Because its a woman, a 'fallen' woman at that in some peoples eyes so obviously it's dar to inconvenient for them if they can instead insist on calling her consort to emphasise her lesser status

Consort just means wife of the king, as opposed to Queen Regnant, i.e ruling in her own right. It isn't a lesser title because she didn't give birth to the heir to the throne, it isn't a lesser title because she's a 'fallen woman,' it's because she's the wife of the king and Queen Consort is her official title - which will no doubt be dropped in time once everyone's got used to the fact we now have a king, not a queen regnant.

I'm copying and pasting my answer to a different poster below so I appreciate some of it doesn't apply to your post but it's essentially the same thing

*I know she would be a queen consort regardless

But as you say, it's the unhinged Diana worshipers that seem to be so focused in her being 'consort'

Hence my point it's because she is a 'fallen' woman so they want to try to make her sound lesser by insisting on the consort bit being used because they think it makes her sound less that Queen would by itself

I understand the press using it to start off with to make things less confusing but I am talking about the people now who are adamant it should remain Queen Consort because otherwise its 'going too far'

The only way it can be going too far is if those people think Queen sounds 'more' than Queen consort - hence they want her to have the 'lesser' title*

JenniferBarkley · 24/02/2023 12:48

Yes I can't imagine many of those demanding that Camilla retain "Consort" in her title will be calling for the same when it's Kate's turn, nor that they would have been for Diana.

YetMoreNewBeginnings · 24/02/2023 13:06

FeinCuroxiVooz · 24/02/2023 09:31

it's totally normal for the "consort" to be dropped. it would only be necessary if needing to distinguish between her and any other nearby queens. we used to have "Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth and Queen Elizabeth the Queen Mother" which set me wondering what Camilla's title will be when Charles is dead and William is king, with Queen Katherine. Is "Dowager Queen" a thing?

Dowager Queen is a thing, but unless William marries a new wife called Camilla it won’t be necessary. She’ll just be HM Queen Camilla. Same as HM Queen Mary and HM Queen Alexandra were after being widowed.

The onky change will be that she would no longer be HM The Queen, which she is at the moment as the King’s wife.

The only time Dowager, Queen Mother PE Consort are used is too differentiate between people. Mary and Alexandra were Queen Mothers but never needed to use the title. The only QEQM did was because her daughter had the same name.

That’s the only reason consort is being used sometimes atm. It would have been confusing if the BBC had announced that “King Charles will return to London tomorrow accompanied by the Queen. Princess Anne will accompany her mother’s body on the return to London” for example.

once people get into the way of thinking that HM The Queen = Camilla the consort bit will vanish.

LaMarschallin · 24/02/2023 13:35

Same as HM Queen Mary and HM Queen Alexandra were after being widowed.

Queen Mary was always "old Queen Mary" to my mother; as a child, I actually thought that was part of her title.

MrsClatterbuck · 24/02/2023 13:40

MidgeHardcastle · 24/02/2023 07:13

King Edward VII and Queen Alexandra
King George V and Queen Mary
King George VI and Queen Elizabeth

THIS IN SPADES

Queen is the title and consort is the job description

Swipe left for the next trending thread