Page 34 | That rugby player…in a scrum with a woman down an alleyway… wtf!

GoingOnce · 2023-02-15T19:53:07+00:00

AIBU to be shocked someone would want to do this/have it done to them? I mean, the main offense is that he’s cheated on his poor wife, but also - is this a thing??? 🤢

MrWhippersnapper · 19/02/2023 07:45

The alley is off the main pedestrian street apparently so hardly discreet

Sparklebynight · 19/02/2023 08:06

I think his wife is well shot of this gigantic, drunken and seemingly very conceited oaf.

Aside from all the vulgarity with that woman down the alley next to Greggs, I can't help thinking that because of the size of him (and the amount he probably eats because of all the training) that he must make the most unpleasant of smells in the bathroom.

I know some women (and men) look at rugby players and think of their huge manly thighs and bulging biceps but I just can't help thinking of the horrendous malodours they must generate and wouldn't want one in my house.

Sparklebynight · 19/02/2023 08:08

Also he looks a bit simple.

Frangipanitime · 19/02/2023 09:07

Jesus. That second video. The state of rhe pair of them. In full view of the street.

she braced up against the wall bent over fully exposed. Dress up. Knickers down, but this time arms straight outbraced against the wall, not touching the ground like last time, he’s standing behind her, fully exposed, boxers down, touching himself. He’s trying to have sex with her that way.

they are much further forward this time and literally yards from the Main Street. Anyone walking past would see them.

OnTheRunWithMannyMontana · 19/02/2023 09:35

Florenz · 18/02/2023 23:36

Have his team played a game today? What was the crowd reaction?

No it's today at 3pm.

Cuppsoupmonster · 19/02/2023 09:40

Frangipanitime · 19/02/2023 09:07

Jesus. That second video. The state of rhe pair of them. In full view of the street.

she braced up against the wall bent over fully exposed. Dress up. Knickers down, but this time arms straight outbraced against the wall, not touching the ground like last time, he’s standing behind her, fully exposed, boxers down, touching himself. He’s trying to have sex with her that way.

they are much further forward this time and literally yards from the Main Street. Anyone walking past would see them.

It’s really odd, it’s like in both videos he’s trying to force himself to want to have sex and she’s allowing him to do whatever he needs to do to get hard 🤢 from the descriptions (haven’t seen either of them - promise!)

Not like a really lustful encounter where they just can’t resist

gelatogina · 19/02/2023 09:43

they may as well have been on the main road…there goes the argument that they were ‘expecting privacy’.

@Cuppsoupmonster i think he is just really drunk and can’t get it up. It definitely doesn’t seem like it was worth it for either of them 😂

BadNomad · 19/02/2023 09:51

He was definitely pissed as a pudding. You probably could have cut his leg off without him noticing. He was determined though. Bless. God loves a trier.

Frangipanitime · 19/02/2023 09:51

It’s really odd, it’s like in both videos he’s trying to force himself to want to have sex and she’s allowing him to do whatever he needs to do to get hard 🤢 from the descriptions (haven’t seen either of them - promise)

no, no, not at all. He clearly wants to have sex and is visibly aroused in the second video , it’s just he is drunk , but that’s not a man who doesn’t wish to have sex. They are both willing participants. Just drunk

Frangipanitime · 19/02/2023 10:05

they may as well have been on the main road…there goes the argument that they were ‘expecting privacy’.

yes it looks like they have started off in plain view of the street, a little into the alley where it is very brightly lit, and the video was filmed from the Main Street, then they decided to move further back to where the second video was filmed.

for me this second one is way worse. She’s really exposed herself as its under bright street lights and for everyone to see. Legs apart, hands on the wall, bent at the waist and naked from the waist down.

these people aren’t young adults,. They are married adults in their thirties with children. And friends with each others spouses.

for me this new second video is way worse .

LynneBenfield · 19/02/2023 10:12

Cuppsoupmonster · 19/02/2023 09:40

It’s really odd, it’s like in both videos he’s trying to force himself to want to have sex and she’s allowing him to do whatever he needs to do to get hard 🤢 from the descriptions (haven’t seen either of them - promise!)

Not like a really lustful encounter where they just can’t resist

Show quote history

I haven’t seen either video either but ‘Brewer’s Droop’ is a thing and whilst the mind may be willing, the body may be far from able after a long period on the booze.

Frangipanitime · 19/02/2023 10:16

LynneBenfield · 19/02/2023 10:12

I haven’t seen either video either but ‘Brewer’s Droop’ is a thing and whilst the mind may be willing, the body may be far from able after a long period on the booze.

Show quote history

Just look at the videos if you want to join the conversation as you are off at a tangent. He doesn’t have brewers droop. His erection is clearly and unfortunately visible in the second video. The first one (chronologically) it’s blurred a little but it looks the same. There is no brewers droop.

LynneBenfield · 19/02/2023 10:20

Fair enough @Frangipanitime , I was just offering an explanation to the poster I quoted, who also hadn’t seen the video, and suggested that he was trying to force himself.

Frangipanitime · 19/02/2023 10:34

Actually just looked at the new one again, his trousers are down, but his boxers are up and fully on, he’s just, ehrm, getting it out. And ehrm, touching her with us other hand.

she’s the one with her knickers down and dress up.

Moonmelodies · 19/02/2023 10:44

Sparklebynight · 19/02/2023 08:06

I think his wife is well shot of this gigantic, drunken and seemingly very conceited oaf.

Aside from all the vulgarity with that woman down the alley next to Greggs, I can't help thinking that because of the size of him (and the amount he probably eats because of all the training) that he must make the most unpleasant of smells in the bathroom.

I know some women (and men) look at rugby players and think of their huge manly thighs and bulging biceps but I just can't help thinking of the horrendous malodours they must generate and wouldn't want one in my house.

He really isn't gigantic at all.

Lampzade · 19/02/2023 10:55

Sparklebynight · 19/02/2023 08:06

I think his wife is well shot of this gigantic, drunken and seemingly very conceited oaf.

Aside from all the vulgarity with that woman down the alley next to Greggs, I can't help thinking that because of the size of him (and the amount he probably eats because of all the training) that he must make the most unpleasant of smells in the bathroom.

I know some women (and men) look at rugby players and think of their huge manly thighs and bulging biceps but I just can't help thinking of the horrendous malodours they must generate and wouldn't want one in my house.

I hope his wife has gone and had herself tested.
It is not only the fact that he was sleeping around, but he was prepared to risk the health of his wife. Grim

BTW- I am sick to death of people using alcohol as an excuse to act like a complete an utter dick ( excuse the pun)

Abraxan · 19/02/2023 10:57

ImAvingOops · 16/02/2023 11:24

I still think it's outrageous that the woman has lost her job. She did something that she thought was private and didn't know was going to be filmed and broadcast to the world - her personal life is her business and nothing to do with her employer.

Most jobs have a clause in them regarding bringing the company/business into disrepute through your behaviour outside of work. The fact that the woman's workplace is publicly known means that the business's name is damaged in some way. So yes, it's a sackable offence.

If I was found in similar circumstances and the name of our workplaces were published then yes, my school would look to sack me. So would dh's law firm. Pretty much all of our friends have similar clauses in our contracts and we wouldn't expect to keep our jobs.

I do believe the rugby player should also be subject to this. However the nature of his job means he probably won't, however unfair that may seem.

The woman won't be unemployable though. She will find new employment in time but for now this is one of the consequences of her actions that evening.

pristinesurfacesGBTD · 19/02/2023 11:11

BadNomad · 19/02/2023 09:51

He was definitely pissed as a pudding. You probably could have cut his leg off without him noticing. He was determined though. Bless. God loves a trier.

Stop it! 😂🤣

Cuppsoupmonster · 19/02/2023 11:16

Had to share this

That rugby player…in a scrum with a woman down an alleyway… wtf!

ThePollutedShadesOfPemberley · 19/02/2023 12:57

I haven't been able to get out of my head the story upthread by a PP that said she got ill after kissing a bloke that had been rimming another woman the night before.

Bleurrgh! Ecoli is a the punchline of a joke I have no interest in hearing!

Frangipanitime · 19/02/2023 13:33

ThePollutedShadesOfPemberley · 19/02/2023 12:57

I haven't been able to get out of my head the story upthread by a PP that said she got ill after kissing a bloke that had been rimming another woman the night before.

Bleurrgh! Ecoli is a the punchline of a joke I have no interest in hearing!

I doubt that is true, your own saliva would wash away the germs, and you’d have to assume the man had eaten or drunk since then, so I call bs.

for the other comments on her getting fired and him not. Different industries have different codes of Conduct. They do not do the same job for the same employer.

it is nothing to do with gender, she was fired as she’s in a client facing role as an estate agent, and negotiates house sales. With everyone local knowing who she is her position would have been untenable. Many people will not have wished her negotiating their sales or showing their houses due to the morals issue.

being a rugby player isn’t the same issue. Ain’t no one stopping going to watch rugby as he’s playing. Quite the opposite more likely. As they likely would if she was a female sports person.

her dismissal is nothing to do with gender and everything to do with codes of conduct for the respective industries and their individual jobs. And the second video shows one hundred percent she didn’t expect any privacy. Far from it. She’s pretty much nearly on the Main Street and directly under bright lighting.

ThePollutedShadesOfPemberley · 19/02/2023 13:37

Frangipanitime · 19/02/2023 13:33

I doubt that is true, your own saliva would wash away the germs, and you’d have to assume the man had eaten or drunk since then, so I call bs.

for the other comments on her getting fired and him not. Different industries have different codes of Conduct. They do not do the same job for the same employer.

it is nothing to do with gender, she was fired as she’s in a client facing role as an estate agent, and negotiates house sales. With everyone local knowing who she is her position would have been untenable. Many people will not have wished her negotiating their sales or showing their houses due to the morals issue.

being a rugby player isn’t the same issue. Ain’t no one stopping going to watch rugby as he’s playing. Quite the opposite more likely. As they likely would if she was a female sports person.

her dismissal is nothing to do with gender and everything to do with codes of conduct for the respective industries and their individual jobs. And the second video shows one hundred percent she didn’t expect any privacy. Far from it. She’s pretty much nearly on the Main Street and directly under bright lighting.

Show quote history

I disagree with this. The rimmer caught the bacteria from the rimmee. He then had the infection himself that he passed on to the next woman.

I caught Ecoli from a coffee mug that had been inadequately washed after a dog had drunk from it at a previous workplace. We took samples from the dog to discover it had subclinical Ecoli.

I have never been as ill before or since.

billy1966 · 19/02/2023 13:40

@Cuppasoupmonster very funny.

@ThePollutedShadesOfPemberley me too.
🤢🤮

Mooshamoo · 19/02/2023 15:07

Frangipanitime · 19/02/2023 13:33

I doubt that is true, your own saliva would wash away the germs, and you’d have to assume the man had eaten or drunk since then, so I call bs.

for the other comments on her getting fired and him not. Different industries have different codes of Conduct. They do not do the same job for the same employer.

it is nothing to do with gender, she was fired as she’s in a client facing role as an estate agent, and negotiates house sales. With everyone local knowing who she is her position would have been untenable. Many people will not have wished her negotiating their sales or showing their houses due to the morals issue.

being a rugby player isn’t the same issue. Ain’t no one stopping going to watch rugby as he’s playing. Quite the opposite more likely. As they likely would if she was a female sports person.

her dismissal is nothing to do with gender and everything to do with codes of conduct for the respective industries and their individual jobs. And the second video shows one hundred percent she didn’t expect any privacy. Far from it. She’s pretty much nearly on the Main Street and directly under bright lighting.

Show quote history

You're saying it's safe.

Would you want to kiss a man the day after he had rimmed a woman then?

He has stuck his tongue in someone's asshole the day before, and now he is sticking it in your mouth.

Would you be happy with that? Would you think it is totally safe?

Him eating and drinking does not wash ecoli away. The e - Coli would stay on his tongue

pristinesurfacesGBTD · 19/02/2023 15:13

Frangipanitime · 19/02/2023 09:07

Jesus. That second video. The state of rhe pair of them. In full view of the street.

she braced up against the wall bent over fully exposed. Dress up. Knickers down, but this time arms straight outbraced against the wall, not touching the ground like last time, he’s standing behind her, fully exposed, boxers down, touching himself. He’s trying to have sex with her that way.

they are much further forward this time and literally yards from the Main Street. Anyone walking past would see them.

Is the second video really the same couple ? I saw it and wondered if it was a copy cat.... To keep the story going. I can't believe how visible and exposed to a public path they are in the second video. The first video looks like it could be round the back of a building rather than an alley visible from the street.