Out of interest, do you understand the argument is not 'banning' trans people from sport? Do you understand that no trans person is 'banned' from playing sport unless they are taking performance enhancing drugs? Which is testosterone for females, of course.
If you are fully supportive of males playing in the category based on sex that is what the female sports categories are, what other categories in sport are you happy for people to be able access when they are not eligible?
Age? Are you happy for a 25 year old to compete against under 12 year olds? What about that 25 year old competing against an 85 year old in the masters category? Happy with that?
Ability? Are you happy for someone who has no disability to compete in a category set up for a specific group with specific needs? Such as someone with full vision to compete in a group for visually impaired people? Happy with that?
What about for a person who is a professional in that sport to compete in the novice category for that sport? Happy with that?
What about a person who is not from a country or region to take the place of a person from that country or region? Happy with that?
What about allowing a cyclist with an electric engine to compete in the Tour de France? Happy with that?
What other categories do you want to get rid of ?
Because it is getting rid of the category set up for females to allow any male person to compete in that category. Just because that male is 'weakened' in some way doesn't mean they should be eligible to compete in a category that was set up to protect the competitive needs of females.
Should all weakened males get to compete in the female category?
Or is this just because some people have taken a special label for themselves. And because some sports have been referred to in the past as 'women's' categories rather than the 'female' category.