Me and DH got married a long time ago - early 1990s, and we paid for the wedding ourselves. Didn't get a brass farthing from either side. DH's parents were struggling financially, and on the verge of losing their house when we got married. Mine were not well off. Dad had been off work for some months due to illness, mum never worked, so they could not pay anything either.
Me and DH funded it all ourselves. Dress, flowers, meal for 30 people, service, wedding rings, DH's suit, best man's suit, 2 bridesmaid's dresses, photographer, honeymoon etc etc. If someone had given us potentially 25 to 40% of the cost of the wedding, we would have been delighted.
My 3 female cousins had theirs paid for by parents (all late 1980s,) and I was pretty pissed off (at the time) that no-one paid for ours. Not angry or bitter with our parents as it wasn't their fault they couldn't afford it, but still a little bitter. But we managed it as we both had good jobs, and we still put a good deposit down on a small newbuild home 2 years after getting married.
We had a small wedding with just 30 people - including us - and a meal at the local pub for the 'reception.' It lasted from midday to 3pm. We had a little buffet at the local social club at 7pm, and the same 30 people came. (Although some 100 people were there altogether as it was a public social club...) We danced into the night to the music the social club DJ played, and walked home deliriously happy at 1am, and went on our honeymoon 2 days later.
So yeah we paid for it ourselves, whilst my 3 cousins got a big huge fancy wedding paid for by my aunts and uncles, with much more money spent, much more expensive wedding dresses, and over 100 people at each one. (most of whom my cousins didn't know!)
But all 3 of their marriages broke up within 10 years. So.......... 🤷♀️ who is the real winner here...... 