"I don’t like it because it is preachy and headmisstressy. And the only people I know who follow it are schoolteachers."
Agreed, except the last point. I'm a teacher, I know lots of teachers and I don't know anyone irl who does it. Only ever heard it on mumsnet.
I also think we need to move beyond the false dichotomy of 4 / very restricted presents and piles of tat. Even having lots of presents doesn't mean tat.
My children always had 4 main presents, but they had sacks from FC as well. These sacks contained a mix of:
- consumables to replace the things they have used over the year (stationery, art materials, bath pens, candles etc...)
- things they needed (dressing gowns, vests and pants, new clothes etc, nice new hair bobbles etc...) often these would be their favourite character when little, or a nice brand they like when older. Eg when my eldest was at secondary it was only cool to wear Victoria's secrets or Calvin Klein pants.
- stuff they wanted for their hobbies (whether that was their organised sports or for things they enjoyed doing at home E.g scrapbooking)
- nice foods and sweet treats I wouldn't normally buy. Nice chocolates etc...
So buying lots does not necessarily 🟰 tat, and it is lazy thinking to think it does. I would say, at least 80% of the presents my children get are stuff they would probably get anyway, with the exception that I would normally buy supermarket pants, they only get VS pants when it's Christmas.
However, I do think it's a class thing. I grew up very working class, and this is the way I had FC when I was little. It was my mum's way of affording presents.. and I loved the big pillow case of presents I got every year. Had my mum had the money to buy these things all year round and to afford presents on top of that, she would have done. So I do think it is a bit mean to look down on people for buying more... many do it because they can't afford to just buy new clothes etc all year round.