I think this case is tragic. I don't believe in vigilante justice but I can't pretend I'm sorry this man is dead. He had 24 previous convictions for sexual offences, he would almost certainly offended again upon release from prison but now he won't be able to and that's a good thing as far as I'm concerned. There are some offenders who can use prison time to reflect on what they've done and can be rehabilitated. I don't believe paedophiles can be rehabilitated so it's best if they are dead or locked up.
No amount of prison time for the offender helps survivors, they will always serve a life sentence.
She must have felt so distressed when he was released on bail and returned to live nearby whilst awaiting trial. Reading the article it sounds like she was devastated by, what she felt was, her failure to protect her children so she made sure he'd never hurt them again.
A Home Office spokesperson said it had reviewed the issue, but it could not publish its findings because they contained sensitive information, which could potentially be used by offenders to exploit the system.
Here's the Home Office admitting those loop holes still exist and then in the next breath...
It said the UK had some of the toughest powers in the world to deal with sex offenders living in the community.
Not really believable when this man had previously served jail time for sexual offences but had still been convicted of 24 in total and had managed to change his name to hide his past.