God almighty.
I just read the BBC article.
An utter tragedy all round.
But in response to the PP who questioned whether the poor woman bore some responsibility for allowing the offender access to her sons, I’ll tell you part of the issue…..
The paedophile was old, male, charming and an expert at grooming. Women are socialised to be kind, take on the roles of carers to anyone who appears to need it. How often do women who voice suspicions about dodgy behaviour get accused of being paranoid and seeing danger at every corner?
There is an element of institutional gas-lighting at play that needs to be addressed.
As for the ludicrous loopholes that allow sex offenders to change names and re-build their lives? Unbelievable. I would want the judges investigated in this case - law or not, it almost sanctions repeat offenders to just keep going.
This case is an unholy mess and should lead to a stringent review of the whole system.