Ok, so let me get this straight.
You believe affairs are ok, are part of life and ow should not be castigated or held reponsible in any way.
It is wholly on the man who is married. Got it.
Yet if there is warning to the ow, who has suceeded in 'winning her prize' it is hurtful to the ow to hear those words that 'it creates a vacancy'
Why on earth would you be uset by this term, you agree with affairs, you agree with ow and don't believe they are responsible in any way, why would it hurt you if an adulterous man was then in turn adulterous to you. You should be friends with them, welcome them with open arms for they are the victims of male oppression and are only playing the game of, if you can't beat them join them.
You should be suporting them, encouraging them to feel no shame if they shag your newly aquired married man, hell why not because if you felt any ammount of hurt and called them out on it, you too would be acused of being a mysogynist and of hating other women.
That's quite hypocritical, it's ok for me to be the ow but I don't want anyone doing it to me. Ok, that's not selfish is it.
Wrapping it up as though it's just the mans fault if you are the ow and then having the nerve to blame his promiscuity if he further shags arround because it affects you personally in a detrimental way ?
Honestly you couldn't make this shit up, no wonder men find such easy victims.
Your reasoning and logic are skewed but it does explain a lot.