Prompted by a discussion on here.
I'm a police officer and today we received an email from out chief constable to say that only 17% of incidents police in our force attend are for crime .
The other 83% are non crime related - mainly mental health issues. Police forces are now taking on the work of other agencies which means that they are not dealing with crime .
Partner agencies are so stretched the fall out is now being dealt with by police because we don't shut shop, don't only work 9-5 , and cannot say no .
I read and see regularly that police are criticised for not dealing with crime .
Well - this is why . Because we are picking up the slack from mental health, social services and medical incidents.
I think it's time for people to decide what they want from their police . If we weren't dealing with the 83 % of incidents that are not crime related then perhaps we could spend more time on the 17% that are . ?
I don't think people realise that this is happening to this extent .
AIBU?
To all those wondering why police aren't investigating crime
stillvicarinatutu · 30/09/2022 13:35
Relevanceiskey · 30/09/2022 16:29
@Brefugee for the most part, crime is dealt with as effectively as possible. You would only be cutting your nose of to spite your face with that skewed perception. People latch on to whatever will fit their narrative so I agree, it won't change.
willingtolearn · 30/09/2022 16:22
@Nidan2Sandan It's not just the police that some people to expect to solve all their problems.
It's that they always expect SOMEONE ELSE to solve their problems.
Police, teachers, GP, Social Workers, government, family, friends, other taxpayers - as long as it's not them.
Yes, some people need help. But you cannot help someone who will not help themselves - not in drug addiction, not in mental health, not in physical health, not in debt, not in employment or issues with their housing.
You have to do some of the work yourself. Even if that feels impossible it is necessary.
BlueMongoose · 30/09/2022 16:28
I found your post interesting, even I was surprised at it, and I've observed for some time the police responding less and less to things like fraud, theft, and burglary, for example.
It just goes to show that we need not just to fund the police properly, which currently we aren't, but the NHS and other services- like local authority services. You can't do as the tories have done and cut 40% of funding to local authorities, as they did even before covid, and still expect them to be able to fund social services and so on to the same extent, and the NHS was facing large increases in waiting lists under the tories ( at least a doubling) well before covid too. But this is what people voted for, sadly.
stillvicarinatutu · 30/09/2022 14:27
What I'm saying is for every 100 incidents called in to the police only 17 of those are for actual crimes - it's not that we are only attending 17% - it's that only 17% of the calls for our service are crime related.
This reply has been deleted
This has been deleted by MNHQ for breaking our Talk Guidelines.
Isaidnoalready · 30/09/2022 16:30
Madalaine mcann? Is she part of the 17%?
My ex threatened to set fire to my home with our children in it this wasn't deemed mental health or police worthy just "parental dispute" despite him being under investigation for an assault he was completely innocent 🙄
Ted27 · 30/09/2022 16:41
what percentage of calls called be classed as preventative ? And isnt preventing crime part of the police’s role?
I have twice called the police about neighbours domestic disputes. One several years ago when I was concerned that the woman would end up seriously assaulted or worse.
The second only 2 weeks ago where the man was forcibly trying to put the woman out on the street, she had no shoes on, no bag, no phone, nothing.
Surely police intervention in these situations is better before an actual, potentially serious crime is committed?
This reply has been deleted
This has been deleted by MNHQ for breaking our Talk Guidelines.
Newnameforthistopic · 30/09/2022 14:32
Until "society" votes to put a Gvmnt into power that is willing to support the vulnerable in society, the problem will just continue to get bigger and bigger, now matter how much smoke and mirrors are used to try and pretend it isn't happening.
No, NO, NO. Much of this is not for us or Government departments to manage. It is the responsibility of families and of course the people themselves.
We have worked and saved and spent time and money on our own children and older relatives.
Don't take even more of my money subsidising the wastrels and rif-raf of society who don't bother.
Scoobyblue · 30/09/2022 16:14
I have been a victim of crime several times. The police have never ever shown up. I have no confidence in the ability of the police to solve or prevent crime. The only time I ever see the police is buying coffee in the coffee shop. I have completely lost faith in the police as an institution.
To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.