Sorry was busy, just to clear up a little misconception.
A poster was claiming teachers teach children how to have sex in year five. This is not true. In year five children can be taught the absolute basics of reproduction and sex from a very mechanical angle.
Any teacher talking to your 10 year old about how to get pleasure from sex, anal etc and pushing that kind of agenda needs their hard drive tested.
We have poor sex education take up amongst certain demographics in this country. I wish the up the butt advocates would stop and realise just who else would withdraw and how it would effect them if sex education became a how to manual, including risky behaviours, rather than centres on safety and respect as it is now.
The government has recently added components that deal with the normalisation of porn. As in, teaching it isn't real, depicts unsafe acts, harmful for actors etc. So no need to teach pupils specific harmful sex acts.
This is not the same as the American abstinence model. The UK has founded a sex education programme that is informative whilst steering clear of advocating acts. Pretending they are the same thing shows your agenda.
We don't need to give in to the normalisation of the harm of girls. What's next? Safe breathplay? Well judging by some of the don't shame me, comments, yes that's next.
It's not about you. It's about protecting children from acts that harm them. No adult in their right mind will teach children to self harm.