Meet the Other Phone. Flexible and made to last.

Meet the Other Phone.
Flexible and made to last.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Porn culture has led to women suffering injuries during sex

890 replies

Doyoumind · 12/08/2022 10:01

Apart from all the violence etc porn portrays as normal, anal sex is definitely treated as an everyday thing that women enjoy. I don't personally. I know some women claim they do but I've certainly known men who pressure for it and I'm guessing it's only got worse in the years since I was dating.

This article suggests women are unknowingly entering into something that can cause serious injuries.

www.theguardian.com/society/2022/aug/11/rise-in-popularity-of-anal-sex-has-led-to-health-problems-for-women

OP posts:
gnilliwdog · 12/08/2022 18:47

@PollyRockets Do you want to educate 9/10 year olds about anal sex?

PollyRockets · 12/08/2022 18:48

gnilliwdog · 12/08/2022 18:47

@PollyRockets Do you want to educate 9/10 year olds about anal sex?

Nope

What an odd question

gnilliwdog · 12/08/2022 18:50

@PollyRockets What age would you like this to be part of a school education then? You did mention Year 5, sorry if I misunderstood.

Americano75 · 12/08/2022 18:52

TeaStory · 12/08/2022 11:45

Untrue. Anal sex between men over 21 was made legal in 1967. For heterosexual couples it was 1994.

www.stonewallcymru.org.uk/help-advice/criminal-law/sexual-offences

And considering the thread is specifically about the experiences of women having anal sex with men, there was no need for me to ‘clarify’.

We must be similar ages, I knew exactly what you meant.

gnilliwdog · 12/08/2022 18:53

@PollyRockets You also mentioned educating young girls -which to me means a child, and men - which means adult men to me. Just wondering where you would want all this education to take place, and if you want to educate young girls why not young boys too?

PollyRockets · 12/08/2022 18:53

gnilliwdog · 12/08/2022 18:50

@PollyRockets What age would you like this to be part of a school education then? You did mention Year 5, sorry if I misunderstood.

If you read the context of that comment and the one I was replying to it would have made more sense. Always good practice before jumping into a chain to read for context.

It should be part of secondary sex education.

gnilliwdog · 12/08/2022 18:56

@PollyRockets OK, secondary means educating young girls and young boys. You did originally state young girls and men, which just sounds odd.

PollyRockets · 12/08/2022 18:57

gnilliwdog · 12/08/2022 18:56

@PollyRockets OK, secondary means educating young girls and young boys. You did originally state young girls and men, which just sounds odd.

Oh now you can read

AdamRyan · 12/08/2022 19:01

BenCoopersSupportWren · 12/08/2022 18:14

Perhaps you missed the part of my post where I said and we need to teach boys to respect their sexual partners, to accept "no" without coercion or shaming. Both sexes will benefit from understanding that the majority of modern porn is misogynistic and fake and is not a template for a healthy sex life.

It's not about boys accepting no really because the report I linked about showed teenage girls expect to do anal and expect it not to be pleasurable. So if boys ask, they may say yes due to the culture surrounding them.

Changing the culture is what's needed and it's not down to girls that the culture is what it is. The actions you wrote for girls were a lot more in depth and nuanced than those for boys. This is a patriarchy so it's not surprising but I'm just so fed up of females being seen as in control of what males do to them.

Why not focus on the boys for once? They need to stop seeing anal as a badge of honour and start seeing it as risky and harmful, and unlikely to be fun for their partner. We need to stop tolerating "brown wings" banter and start teaching that sex is about connection, not performance. Easier said than done but "teaching girls to say no" isn't the answer. After all, no means yes, yes means anal to a lot of boys

DobbyHasASock · 12/08/2022 19:04

Well you are still wrong. As it starts in year six. Unless you are including puberty information and naming body parts, which is mostly largely year six anyone.
Personally, if any teaching professional starting advocating for anal sex education, outside of giving the risks and why it's not a good idea of course, I'd be suggesting they get their hardrive checked.

gnilliwdog · 12/08/2022 19:07

@DobbyHasASock Agreed. It is highly suspect to teach to the 'young girls' how to have anal sex with 'men.'

Fftb98 · 12/08/2022 19:08

Perhaps if we can keep the thread above the level of checking peoples reading skills. That could just be a minimum..... Or am I expecting too much?

Americano75 · 12/08/2022 19:10

'Vanilla' is just the new 'frigid'.

DobbyHasASock · 12/08/2022 19:10

What a pointlessly rude comment.

Also a bit ironic considering the amount of people who clearly haven't read the article.

DobbyHasASock · 12/08/2022 19:11

Americano75 · 12/08/2022 19:10

'Vanilla' is just the new 'frigid'.

Gosh that takes me back.
Class of Frigid 99 lol.

Stoma · 12/08/2022 19:11

DobbyHasASock · 12/08/2022 19:04

Well you are still wrong. As it starts in year six. Unless you are including puberty information and naming body parts, which is mostly largely year six anyone.
Personally, if any teaching professional starting advocating for anal sex education, outside of giving the risks and why it's not a good idea of course, I'd be suggesting they get their hardrive checked.

I don't think you can ignore it since boys are watching porn anyway. Maybe it's more suitable for 16+ though.

Nobody teaching sex education should be promoting anything, besides contraception and consent, regardless of what it is they're speaking about.

DobbyHasASock · 12/08/2022 19:14

By professionals giving children tips on how to have anal sex, they would be endorsing it.
Sex education is based on research and a balancing of factors in this country. We already teach how porn isn't real and about internet safety and consent.

I see no reason to add in how to have slightly less risky anal sex. It's grooming.

Americano75 · 12/08/2022 19:16

DobbyHasASock · 12/08/2022 19:11

Gosh that takes me back.
Class of Frigid 99 lol.

I'm showing my age I know, but remember how that was the way some boys would try and shame/coerce girls into sex they didn't really want?

Stoma · 12/08/2022 19:23

16+ is old enough to hear about it, and at that age, they're already familiar with what it is. And it shouldn't be all positive either. Porn doesn't show you the downsides so it's an opportunity to actually have a balanced discussion. Same as how there's discussions about consent in school.

DobbyHasASock · 12/08/2022 19:26

There is no reason to teach about the positives, so called, of anal sex.

Sex education is not focused on positives, aside from the relationship building, respect side which is generally quite separate.
It is about safety and pregnancy knowledge, respect and boundaries.
Anal sex doesn't fit this.
Although I do believe the stats on prolapse etc would be useful but they can be communicated without the anal normalising narrative.

Midlifemusings · 12/08/2022 19:34

We also need to get away from the messaging that all boys want is sex and that anyone who isn't wanting sex all the time is some kind of weird aberation. There are so many social messages that normalize guys being only about sex and only wanting sex and assuming that ever guy wants sex with every girl he meets or else he is broken, not a real guy and creepy / weird. Also that he needs to be good in bed from Day 1 and know how to please a woman and be adventurous and not boring. When a guy wants to take it slower he gets insulted for being not that into her and that if he liked her he would have made moves. All the BDE and SDE is harmful as well. Lots of harmful social messaging about sex for everyone.

PollyRockets · 12/08/2022 19:41

DobbyHasASock · 12/08/2022 19:26

There is no reason to teach about the positives, so called, of anal sex.

Sex education is not focused on positives, aside from the relationship building, respect side which is generally quite separate.
It is about safety and pregnancy knowledge, respect and boundaries.
Anal sex doesn't fit this.
Although I do believe the stats on prolapse etc would be useful but they can be communicated without the anal normalising narrative.

Of course you teach about the positives

It's called a balance

Showing all angles so people can make INFORMED choices

I was told sex feels good when in school for sex Ed.

PollyRockets · 12/08/2022 19:43

gnilliwdog · 12/08/2022 19:07

@DobbyHasASock Agreed. It is highly suspect to teach to the 'young girls' how to have anal sex with 'men.'

Why would it just be girls and women being taught this?

Men have anal sex too, even the straight ones sometimes like a finger or two up the backside

PollyRockets · 12/08/2022 19:46

DobbyHasASock · 12/08/2022 19:04

Well you are still wrong. As it starts in year six. Unless you are including puberty information and naming body parts, which is mostly largely year six anyone.
Personally, if any teaching professional starting advocating for anal sex education, outside of giving the risks and why it's not a good idea of course, I'd be suggesting they get their hardrive checked.

I began sex education in year 5

As did my 2 eldest

Most decent parents start well before that too at home

Perplexed0522 · 12/08/2022 19:58

PollyRockets · 12/08/2022 19:41

Of course you teach about the positives

It's called a balance

Showing all angles so people can make INFORMED choices

I was told sex feels good when in school for sex Ed.

You genuinely believe schools should talk to students about the pleasure of anal sex?

Jesus.

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is closed and is no longer accepting replies. Click here to start a new thread.

Swipe left for the next trending thread