I find the slavery conversation funny. Not because slavery is funny. You can find the discussion points funny, whilst also knowing it’s a serious issue.
on this thread there’s been vile comments and assumptions made about women who choose to have their nails very long. Things like dirty, vile, attention seeking etc.
The the discussion comes about nail salons themselves and the problem with MDS. Except it’s in incoherent argument that has nothing to do with nail colour or length or services the salon provides. But it is an opportunity to continue to to present that women who don’t care about their nails or only have ‘sensible French’ are morally superior to those that have long, colourful and bejewelled nails.
Trying to turn this into innately morally good or bad is laughable. As is the argument of it being bad for women and ‘we don’t make choices in a vacuum’, whilst believing their choice was made in a vacuum.
No one is suggesting anyone goes into any old salon. Or doesn’t research it. That’s wether it’s for an eyebrow wax, facial, ‘sensible French’ or 4 inch nails. That’s not a good idea for many reasons. If someone choose to use a salon when they know it’s using slave labour, that’s morally wrong. What their nails look like after doesn’t change that.
The lengths some posters (not you directly, I am talking about the thread in general) have gone to on here to try an assert they are better people because of their choices of nails, is laughable.
and, going, back to my earlier point. Why do you think so many posters think a nice French or just tidy nails makes you a better person? Why do they think that places that offer this service, must be automatically better? Anyone who thinks ‘oh these people seem to do more natural looking nails on the whole so can’t possibly be using slave labour’ are really showing their bigotry.
and it’s laughable. That doesn’t mean modern day slavery, itself, is laughable.