Right. So you don't actually respect my right to identify myself as a female person who doesn't share any kind of identity with trans women then.
If you don't respect my right to have a word to describe what I am, you are not respecting my identity, or whatever you want to call it.
We cannot protect sex based rights, or fight sex based oppression, if we are not allowed to have words for biological sex.
We need a word that means female people. And we need the word female, as well.
The word "woman" has been appropriated by male people, and they are now trying to appropriate the word "female" as well. And it's working. Stella Creasy, who has spent months banging on about how the lack of maternity leave and not being allowed to breastfeed in parliament are barriers to women entering politics. And then she says, not only are trans women women, but they are adult human females because they identify as female.
So she feels discriminated against because she is a member of the childbearing sex, but she doesn't think we need a word for the childbearing sex.
We absolutely do need our own exclusive word to describe our own biological sex. We are a distinct class of people, with our own biological reality, our own lived experience, our own unique forms of oppression as a result of our biology.
Denying female people the words to describe themselves is the ultimate male oppression.
So yes, I do disagree with you. Vehemently.
We need, and deserve, and should have, our own exclusive word for what we are, which people who are the literal opposite of us should not be allowed to "identify as".
That is why we are fighting for the words "woman" and "female".
And that is why trans women are not, and never will be, women.
They need to get their own word for whatever it is they believe they are, and leave women out of it.