Gosh, yes, @iloveeverykindofcat - that has really made me wince.
Yes, that is a thing we've seen in history, even in ancient societies desecration of a body is shocking. I "get" the mother's grief, anyone who's had a very poorly child will weep for Hollie's anguish, but, I am very uncomfortable, this poor lad deserves some dignity in death.
And, now there's a precedent, what happens if there is the next family in a similar tragic situation?
If a parent was doing harm to a live child by refusing to follow medical advice then there would be a clear role for social services, or even psychiatric assessment and support for the parent? But here? I have no idea. Who's role is it to look after the interests of a dead child? What ARE his interests?
I'm disappointed it's just a DNR. I suppose it will protect the staff against being expected to apply paddles to the body of a child. I really hoped that the judge would be able to say to turn the machines off, IANAL and I guess there isn't law to cover this situation.
I am glad I'm not a nurse on that ward. I'm terribly clumsy and would possibly trip up right next to the plug and pull it right out the wall.