StolenCookie
Ardent feminists don't usually tone police other women, they tend to engage with the substance of the argument rather than take issue with the way its presented.
I wonder what you mean when you refer to trans people? What was once understood to be upon a tiny group of people with gender dysphoria is now a much larger and diverse community, many of whom argue that gender dysphoria is not necessary to be trans and infact it is transphobic to suggest as much.
How is this group vulnerable and oppressed? As a PP pointed out everyone is bending over backwards to accommodate them, often at the expense of people with other protected characteristics, specifically women and anyone same sex attracted.
Just today, in the interests of inclusion, a publisher has been tweeting about "womb carriers" when refering to native American women who were forcibly sterilised in the 1970's. Even when discussing the horror of something which could only happen to women belonging to, an unarguably, oppressed minority the language was changed so that trans people didn't not feel excluded. They are excluded by the very fucking fact it did not happen to them.
I suspect you have a rather dated understanding of the issues at play here. Lia Thomas's team mates were offered therapy to deal with their concerns about unfair competition and having a naked male in their changing room. I do hope you don't think that is OK.
If you do venture into TRA territory then I'd take your hard hat and keep the visit brief. You are likely to encounter absolutely vile threats of violence and sexual violence if you express the opinion women are human and also worthy of respect and consideration. For real life examples you can look to the threatening and intimidating behaviour displayed by activists against women at a "Let women speak" event in Bristol at the weekend. Mostly young men in black bloc screaming misogynist abuse at women who wanted to ding nothing more than speak.