Meet the Other Phone. Protection built in.

Meet the Other Phone.
Protection built in.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

How have the court of appeal allowed the Rwanda thing to go ahead?

214 replies

rwandanothanks · 14/06/2022 18:17

This seems extremely costly, very bad for the climate change challenge in terms of flights and staggeringly lacking in humanity.

How have the court of appeal allowed these flights to go ahead?

I guess if we rewind from the the real question is how and why on earth are our government pushing this awful idea?

OP posts:
jgw1 · 14/06/2022 22:04

FloydPepper · 14/06/2022 21:50

@caringcarer please answer this.

you advocate applying properly. What is the process for this from outside the uk?

The same way as all the other travellers to the Uk do.

MrsFinkelstein · 14/06/2022 22:06

This reply has been withdrawn

Withdrawn at poster's request

MrsFinkelstein · 14/06/2022 22:07

woodhill · 14/06/2022 20:54

Small number of immigrants?

Yes, 0.25% of total population.

woodhill · 14/06/2022 22:09

It keeps on growing though

Notonthestairs · 14/06/2022 22:11

75% of initial decisions made in the year to March 2022 resulted in a grant asylum or humanitarian protection.

www.refugeecouncil.org.uk/information/refugee-asylum-facts/top-10-facts-about-refugees-and-people-seeking-asylum/

BewareTheLibrarians · 14/06/2022 22:17

@THisbackwithavengeance

It’s not “absolute tosh”, it’s from the government’s own statistics.

“Three quarters (75%) of the initial decisions in the year ending March 2022 were grants (of asylum, humanitarian protection or alternative forms of leave), which is a substantially higher grant rate than previous years. For much of the past decade, around a third of initial decisions were grants. The grant rate in the year ending March 2022 is the highest grant rate in over thirty years (since 82% in 1990).”

Source:
https://www.gov.uk/government/statistics/immigration-statistics-year-ending-march-2022/how-many-people-do-we-grant-asylum-or-protection-to

If you’re talking about people being trafficked here and not picked up by the authorities, that’s not something to blame asylum seekers for - trafficking is against your will. The argument that the Rwanda plan will reduce trafficking is nonsense. It will increase trafficking/smuggling on the Rwandan borders, through Libya and back into the Mediterranean.

WishILivedInThrushGreen · 14/06/2022 22:19

European Court of Human Rights have just stopped the flight and have had the refugees removed.

WishILivedInThrushGreen · 14/06/2022 22:20

Sorry... removed from the plane.

ClaudineClare · 14/06/2022 22:20

Fantastic news. The flight is off, nobody is going to Rwanda tonight.

jgw1 · 14/06/2022 22:28

BewareTheLibrarians · 14/06/2022 22:17

@THisbackwithavengeance

It’s not “absolute tosh”, it’s from the government’s own statistics.

“Three quarters (75%) of the initial decisions in the year ending March 2022 were grants (of asylum, humanitarian protection or alternative forms of leave), which is a substantially higher grant rate than previous years. For much of the past decade, around a third of initial decisions were grants. The grant rate in the year ending March 2022 is the highest grant rate in over thirty years (since 82% in 1990).”

Source:
https://www.gov.uk/government/statistics/immigration-statistics-year-ending-march-2022/how-many-people-do-we-grant-asylum-or-protection-to

If you’re talking about people being trafficked here and not picked up by the authorities, that’s not something to blame asylum seekers for - trafficking is against your will. The argument that the Rwanda plan will reduce trafficking is nonsense. It will increase trafficking/smuggling on the Rwandan borders, through Libya and back into the Mediterranean.

This just goes to show how excellently brexit has allowed us to take back control of our borders.

ClaudineClare · 14/06/2022 22:30

I haven't read the full thread, have not got the stomach for it. But in case it has not been posted, here is one reason why we should not send a single refugee to Rwanda:

www.dw.com/en/rwanda-police-shot-dead-11-refugees-in-food-riot/a-42751170

BewareTheLibrarians · 14/06/2022 22:31

Surprising statistic of the day.

“Our research suggests that around 5.5 million British nationals live over- seas permanently (equivalent to 9.2 per cent of the UK’s population). In addition, an estimated 500,000 British people live abroad for part of the year, mainly through second-home ownership. This means that nearly one in ten British nationals lives part or all of the year abroad. It also means that there are more Britons living abroad than there are foreigners living in the UK.”

https://www.ippr.org/files/images/media/files/publication/2011/05/BA_exec_summ_1548.pdf

jgw1 · 14/06/2022 22:33

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

Appalonia · 14/06/2022 22:36

Well, since the courts found it perfectly acceptable to house rapists in women's prisons just cos they 'identified ' as women, why would they not go along with this morally abhorrent scheme too...?

Jott · 14/06/2022 22:36

woodhill · 14/06/2022 21:17

They can't even provide affordable/suitable housing or services for the people living here and paying for it

That has nothing at all to do with asylum seekers and everything to do with the current Conservative government who have had twelve years to unfuck the country and decided that the best way to achieve this would be to fuck it even more.

People voted for cuts. This is what cuts look like. People voted for Brexit despite warnings that it would fuck services, fuck the economy, and fuck everyone who isn't a multimillion. This is what Brexit looks like.

Asylum seekers didn't vote Conservative because they can't vote. They didn't vote for Brexit either.

Jott · 14/06/2022 22:37

Appalonia · 14/06/2022 22:36

Well, since the courts found it perfectly acceptable to house rapists in women's prisons just cos they 'identified ' as women, why would they not go along with this morally abhorrent scheme too...?

And the award for best "shoehorn something about trans people into a debate that has nothing to do with transpeople" comment goes to...

Flapjacker48 · 14/06/2022 22:41

Essentially the people hand-wringing about illegal migrants are middle class people who are able to throw money at any issues in their lives and are far detached from the areas where such migrants are sent in the UK.

SunnyDayHeyfeverHell · 14/06/2022 22:43

@Flapjacker48 not illegal immigrants they're asylum seekers and to think it's purely middle class people who believe this is wrong is frankly ludicrous.

ClaudineClare · 14/06/2022 22:44

Flapjacker48 · 14/06/2022 22:41

Essentially the people hand-wringing about illegal migrants are middle class people who are able to throw money at any issues in their lives and are far detached from the areas where such migrants are sent in the UK.

Evidence base for this, or are you just making things up?

jgw1 · 14/06/2022 22:44

Jott · 14/06/2022 22:36

That has nothing at all to do with asylum seekers and everything to do with the current Conservative government who have had twelve years to unfuck the country and decided that the best way to achieve this would be to fuck it even more.

People voted for cuts. This is what cuts look like. People voted for Brexit despite warnings that it would fuck services, fuck the economy, and fuck everyone who isn't a multimillion. This is what Brexit looks like.

Asylum seekers didn't vote Conservative because they can't vote. They didn't vote for Brexit either.

It is well known that the current Tory government are great fans of Putin and his Russia. A Russia where very many people live in abject poverty, but a few spend more than millions earn on yachts they don't go on, by stealing money from the government.

BewareTheLibrarians · 14/06/2022 22:50

Flapjacker48 · 14/06/2022 22:41

Essentially the people hand-wringing about illegal migrants are middle class people who are able to throw money at any issues in their lives and are far detached from the areas where such migrants are sent in the UK.

If this is true then why am I living in a rented house that’s slowly falling apart?

Give me my giant middle class house!!

Alternatively, empathy/not wanting your government to be massive shits isn’t class or money related.

BringBackCoffeeCreams · 14/06/2022 22:59

If only all these poor, refugee hating brits could focus their anger on those who've driven them into poverty. Who's hoarding the wealth of the nation and keeping you in poverty? What do we need to do to ensure a fairer distribution? QUICK, LOOK! A BOAT FULL OF DESPERATE PEOPLE COMING TO STEAL THE CRUMBS WE'VE GIVEN YOU.

countrylifer · 14/06/2022 23:03

That has nothing at all to do with asylum seekers and everything to do with the current Conservative government who have had twelve years to unfuck the country and decided that the best way to achieve this would be to fuck it even more.

People voted for cuts. This is what cuts look like. People voted for Brexit despite warnings that it would fuck services, fuck the economy, and fuck everyone who isn't a multimillion. This is what Brexit looks like.

👆👆👆👆👆👆👆

This, again and again. The only people responsible for the fact you can't get a GP appointment, can't get a school place, can't get swimming lessons at your council pool, don't get paid enough, can't afford your insane rent level, can't get help with social housing or social care, can't get an ambulance for hours, can't get seen in A&E in less than 12 hours is the fucking circus in Westminster. This is not a migrant or refugee problem. Anyone saying it is just doing the circus' PR for them. This Rwanda policy, the government's flagship policy no less, is nothing more than a distraction from the fact the government is actually doing no governing at all but rather spending every moment of every day trying - utterly incomprehensibly - to prop up a narcissistic immoral dead man walking.

BewareTheLibrarians · 14/06/2022 23:03

@BringBackCoffeeCreams Exactly.

How have the court of appeal allowed the Rwanda thing to go ahead?
WaitroseWoman · 14/06/2022 23:08

Delighted to hear that the flight will not be leaving. Nobody left on it!

She-devil Priti Patel is "very surprised" at the intervention of the ECHR, which reminded me of He-devil Boris Johnson being "very surprised" to get a Partygate Fixed Penalty Notice. It is a shame for both of them, isn't it?

Swipe left for the next trending thread