It's beyond my comprehension, the deference and talk of the "achievement" of being "on the throne" that long (even that phrase, "on the throne" is archaic). All it really means when it boils down to it is that she didn't die before now. I supposed you could argue that she is the figurehead of an insitution that she has maintained and not let die out. But does such an institution have its place in modern enlightened times, when any wrongdoing is not easily hidden?
As for her "duty" and "public service", yes, I'm sure there were many times she went to cut a ribbon and didn't feel very well or was utterly bored by the prospect, or she had to meet with some dignitaries and be polite even though she couldn't abide them, but you know, we ALL go to work and feel like that. But the difference is, she hasn't had to come home from a 10 hour shift on a crowded bus or tube and had to scrub the bathroom or make tea out of the scraps that are left in the fridge before pay day, hasn't had to turn down a child's wish to try a particular hobby because it's too expensive. Hasn't had to give up her beloved pet dog because she can no longer afford to look after it. She doesn't have to lie on a trolley in an A&E corridor for 10 hours when she's got a serious medical problem.
It has been privilege after privilege, and she is so distant from normal life we must seem like characters on Eastenders to her. I do think William and Harry have more of an idea of what normal people are like because they have mixed with others more than she ever did, as part of their daily lives. But in doing so, I have no doubt there is part of them that also agrees with a large part of the population that the idea of a monarchy in the 21st century is laughable, and they are wholly uncomfortable with the idea. William often looks embarrassed at the deference displayed towards him, or when he has to wear the daft costumes at formal occasions. He's probably desperate to modernise it all, and I'm sure he will do that if his time comes.
People roll out the same old arguments about all the money they bring in tourism. But France has not had a monarchy for a few hundred and years, yet people still flock to Versailles and the chateaus. Other royal palaces around the world still attract tourists even though they haven't had a royal family in them for centuries.
That said, if there are people in the country who get joy out of a bit of flag wearing and oohing and aaahing at a parade then who am I to stop them? People need all the happiness they can get at the moment. I disagree with the notion of a monarchy, but I'm not a party pooper. And frankly the couple of mums at the primary school I work in who rang to complain that we were brain washing the kids and they would not be bringing the kids to school that day, need to get their heads fixed.