I don’t think there should be an expectation about providing childcare. But a discussion about what is reasonable and practically possible prior to birth of children.
I find a lot of these comments bizarre about never seeing grandchildren and people being very disconnected from family. But there may be regional differences across the U.K. in terms of how close knit families are and differences of cultural values.
As I said before, sacrificing all free time and being held hostage as the only childcare provider is completely unreasonable unless expressly wished for.
But equally, disconnecting yourself from family, making no effort to have a relationship with grandchildren, contributing nothing to the family as a whole so that you can go off and have a second teenagehood in old age without a care in the world…. Well it’s a bit cold.
To then expect family - including grandchildren you have no relationship with - to pick up the pieces whenever ill health and frailty sets in is unreasonable…. No matter how much money someone has, unless they die suddenly, there will be help required, this can be intensive during the transitional period - when in and out of hospital/trying to remain at home/waiting for a home place. And remains persistant even when they’re in the home - errands continue, organising their house etc, bills, dealing with care home, personal care etc etc….
Sooo for someone to bugger off essentially from the family for 20-30 years on a pleasure cruise of life and then expect highly intensive care such as this is extremely entitled…. Taking care of and organising provision for a fully grown adult is very much more labour intensive and difficult by comparison to a few kids for a few hours a week - imagine your toddler having a tantrum were 5ft8 and 12 stone…