Meet the Other Phone. Protection built in.

Meet the Other Phone.
Protection built in.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

To if your partner hit your child would you leave them?

166 replies

StarvedMagnolia · 01/05/2022 23:15

What would you do if your partner hit your child? The first time? Would you leave them? Would it depend on what kind of "hitting" it was or what the circumstances are? Or the frequency?

It's a hypothetical situation for me but I always thought if my partner ever raised a hand against my or our child I would leave them irrespective of anything else. I'd feel as if I'm not protecting or standing up for my child otherwise. On the other hand I guess it's not that easy. (If it was a light smack and a one off it might be better for the kids to stay together?? Also, I've got no idea what the legal position is. Wouldn't the partner still have visiting / custody rights anyway or would any fork of violence always result in something like supervised visits only?) I don't think I could respect my partner if they were violent to my or our children.

I'm just wondering if I am being unreasonable. Every once in a while a thread crops up from an upset mum (I've only seen ones from mums) where they are devastated that they have hit their child and everyone tells them not to worry and to just move on. If my partner did that I don't think I could move on.

What do you think? Am I too extreme? Too sanctimonious to think that everyone (including me) can and should avoid being violent to their children?

OP posts:
newnamethanks · 03/05/2022 10:12

Seriously @fUNNYfACE36 , you think carefully considering your appropriate measured response before you wallop a child is a good thing? You need to talk to someone.

KettrickenSmiled · 03/05/2022 10:58

fUNNYfACE36 · 02/05/2022 03:37

Any violence towards me would be a deal breaker. Reasonable chastisement to a child eg a well deserved smacked bum after a warning, i would be ok with. I would not do it myself, but it is not my job to police partner's parenting style, so long as it's not abusive

How bizarre.

You reserve your 'deal breaker' for violence toward yourself, but it's ok for a child to experience the same violence?

What's so special about you, that you reckon your rights are more important than a child's?

Or is it just cowardice, hiding under the nasty facade of "not my job to police"?

If you misbehaved, & I gave you a warning, & you paid it no heed, would you be ok with me giving you a well deserved smacked bum?
No?
But it's ok to do that to a child? Your double standards are disgraceful.

KettrickenSmiled · 03/05/2022 11:02

PumpkinsandKittens · 02/05/2022 10:48

Nope I wouldn’t leave for this, smacking is not illegal and back in the real world everyone I know smacks their kids so I would be left very lonely if I cut everyone off for it! There was a a thread of here the other day where a woman smacked her 4 year old and she got nothing but sympathy even someone saying children can provoke you to smack them! Funny how this thread is very different

Might I suggest that you expand your world?

I don't have any friends who hit children - & I have a lot of friends. That's not a boast - it's remarkably easy to do.

KettrickenSmiled · 03/05/2022 11:08

fUNNYfACE36 · 02/05/2022 11:17

A measured response is worse in my opinion, I can see how some parents get to the end of their tether but to calmly decide the best option is to hit a child is unforgivable.
That, as you say, is just your opinion, which you havent even attempted to justify.

OK @fUNNYfACE36 - it;s unjustifiable.
You are absolutely right, & to prove it to you, please meet me in person this afternoon. I promise I will have my emotions under control, so that when I hit you, it will definitely be the measured response you recommend.

You'll be fine with that, won't you?
Oh - again with the "no"?
Thought so. I know your sort. You can dish it out all right - so long as your victim is small & defenseless - but you can't take it.

KettrickenSmiled · 03/05/2022 11:12

Same1977 · 02/05/2022 11:59

Surely discussion would be in order to make sure it doesn't repeat.However if the child is biologically their they also have a right to decide the type of discipline goes.
Women on here forget children are not 80 percent theirs and 20 the fathers.
Also if this is a one off what is worse one off physical chastising or broken family unit.
It is well know (proven by countless studies ) children dare better in functioning family units

It is well known that single-parent families are also functioning family units.
& in most cases, way more functional than a unit that allows the adults to hit the children.

Nobody has the "right" to decide to hit a child.
They may have the power to.
Never the right.

And I'm not sure what point you are trying to make about fathers, as I don't actually give a fuck what sex the child-hitter is.

JoeGoldberg · 03/05/2022 11:36

This thread is just awful. Minimising people's experiences, defending smacking a child by using words like 'tapping'..

The sooner it's illegal in the U.K. the better.

Greensleeves · 03/05/2022 11:41

OldieWordly · 01/05/2022 23:40

What has happened to the world that everything is thought of only in black and white and nothing allowed in between?

Is context, situation, and reasoning now irrelevant?

Leaving your partner, for a light tap on the back of a child's hand then no, YABU.

Leaving your partner for throwing the child across the room, yes, YANBU

It's perfectly reasonable - and necessary - for there to be red lines and immovable boundaries when it comes to basics like child welfare. "No violence" seems like a good place to draw such a boundary.

If anyone hit my child, that would be the last time they saw us. And it's very likely that I would also call the police, since the person would have committed assault.

Zigzog · 03/05/2022 12:24

My child is a 6ft teenager with severe additional needs and very challenging behaviour. Despite being regularly grabbed, bitten, headbutted and punched my husband has never hit him. If in panic my husband did react by slapping or shoving him, I wouldn't leave him over it. Unless you live in this situation you wouldn't understand the stress, fear and risk involved. It is not comparable to dealing with that behaviour in a work situation.
Doing the same thing to a young child is a different.

Kanaloa · 03/05/2022 13:09

fUNNYfACE36 · 03/05/2022 08:26

'Hitting' means forcefully striking. The law already prohibits that. We are not talking about that .
desperately try to minimise or excuse it by using silly words like ‘tap.’ Tapping someone is what you do when you want their attention

Of course that’s what we’re talking about! If you ‘tapped’ the child they wouldn’t notice. You’re forcefully striking them. And if you thought it was justifiable and normal you wouldn’t have to minimise it.

Shakeitshakeitbaby · 03/05/2022 13:13

JoeGoldberg · 03/05/2022 11:36

This thread is just awful. Minimising people's experiences, defending smacking a child by using words like 'tapping'..

The sooner it's illegal in the U.K. the better.

Already illegal in Scotland.

Siht · 03/05/2022 13:14

I also picked up on the use of "tap". Clearly posters using it as means of justification aren't just tapping their children, as otherwise it wouldn't come into it. If someone asked me how I would respond to an adult hitting me, I wouldn't consider being tapped on the shoulder in my response. 🤔
To answer the OP YANBU. I wouldn't continue contact with anyone who hit my child.

NalashixTerashkova · 03/05/2022 13:27

Yes, I would.

The only problem would be if I left and it meant DH had time alone with our child where he could then abuse him without me knowing. So (speaking as a social worker, though I don't work in child protection) I would report him to social services to ensure there was a record of his physical abuse for the future.

If DH ever laid a finger on our child I wouldn't be able to touch him or look at him the same ever again. Our family would be broken irreparably. It would be the same if it were me. I can't imagine the kind of situation that would have to occur for either of us to physically assault our precious toddler we love so dearly. It's one of the biggest betrayals of a child's trust and respect you can imagine.

SexyPortugese · 03/05/2022 13:30

Siht · 03/05/2022 13:14

I also picked up on the use of "tap". Clearly posters using it as means of justification aren't just tapping their children, as otherwise it wouldn't come into it. If someone asked me how I would respond to an adult hitting me, I wouldn't consider being tapped on the shoulder in my response. 🤔
To answer the OP YANBU. I wouldn't continue contact with anyone who hit my child.

I tapped my two year old on the shoulder yesterday when he was looking at something in the distance to point out a pigeon that had flown and landed behind us, he bloody loves pigeons.

People who use the word 'tap' as a way to make assaulting their child sound more palatable make me feel physically sick. If it were a genuine tap then it wouldn't mean a thing to the child in terms of punishment or being dissuaded from anything. Clearly it's harder and designed to shock or hurt. Funny, the way people use words to try and justify abuse. Reminds me of a domestic abuser twisting things to make the victim lose belief in their own recollection of events.

fUNNYfACE36 · 03/05/2022 13:34

Kanaloa · 03/05/2022 13:09

Of course that’s what we’re talking about! If you ‘tapped’ the child they wouldn’t notice. You’re forcefully striking them. And if you thought it was justifiable and normal you wouldn’t have to minimise it.

Have you seen how cats give a warning tap? It is already illegal ti strike achild in a way which leaves a mark. How forcefully do you think you can smack anyone without leaving a mark?

Trinacham · 03/05/2022 13:35

If it was a smack on the bottom, I might forgive that. I was smacked as a child and it's something I feel strongly that I won't do and don't agree with. I've made that clear to my DH. I understand that my parents (dad mainly that I can remember) lost their temper, rather than did it as they thought it was a good form of discipline. I don't look back in anger when I think of my dear dad, who is no longer with us.

fUNNYfACE36 · 03/05/2022 13:36

Every punishment hurts in some way, otherwise it wouldn't be a punishment

erikbloodaxe · 03/05/2022 14:08

Smacking and hitting are the same thing. The word 'just' often appears before smack/smacked/smacking though. To lessen the offence. Smack = Hit

Kanaloa · 03/05/2022 14:45

fUNNYfACE36 · 03/05/2022 13:34

Have you seen how cats give a warning tap? It is already illegal ti strike achild in a way which leaves a mark. How forcefully do you think you can smack anyone without leaving a mark?

Cats also lick their arseholes and shit in my garden so I wouldn’t hold them up as parenting examples. They also swat at their young because (as animals) they don’t have as many ways of communication as we humans do.

A tap isn’t what is being talked about. If you genuinely tap your children as punishment (which wouldn’t even register) then you’re not what’s being talked about.

Kanaloa · 03/05/2022 14:46

fUNNYfACE36 · 03/05/2022 13:36

Every punishment hurts in some way, otherwise it wouldn't be a punishment

What a weird way to justify hitting your kids. We don’t even hit people to punish them for murder.

fUNNYfACE36 · 03/05/2022 15:33

The dictionary defines 'tap' as a quick light blow

Valeriekat · 03/05/2022 15:54

But murder is OK?

JoeGoldberg · 03/05/2022 15:58

@Shakeitshakeitbaby sorry yes I just realised, of course it's already illegal in Scotland and Wales. I've got toddler brain today!

It should be illegal in England too, and all this bullshit about not wanting to 'nanny' parents it just that - bullshit.

Kanaloa · 03/05/2022 16:05

fUNNYfACE36 · 03/05/2022 15:33

The dictionary defines 'tap' as a quick light blow

You sound desperate.

anon2334 · 03/05/2022 16:20

StarvedMagnolia · 01/05/2022 23:15

What would you do if your partner hit your child? The first time? Would you leave them? Would it depend on what kind of "hitting" it was or what the circumstances are? Or the frequency?

It's a hypothetical situation for me but I always thought if my partner ever raised a hand against my or our child I would leave them irrespective of anything else. I'd feel as if I'm not protecting or standing up for my child otherwise. On the other hand I guess it's not that easy. (If it was a light smack and a one off it might be better for the kids to stay together?? Also, I've got no idea what the legal position is. Wouldn't the partner still have visiting / custody rights anyway or would any fork of violence always result in something like supervised visits only?) I don't think I could respect my partner if they were violent to my or our children.

I'm just wondering if I am being unreasonable. Every once in a while a thread crops up from an upset mum (I've only seen ones from mums) where they are devastated that they have hit their child and everyone tells them not to worry and to just move on. If my partner did that I don't think I could move on.

What do you think? Am I too extreme? Too sanctimonious to think that everyone (including me) can and should avoid being violent to their children?

It's not llegal. A friend of mine did this, they still get contact unless it's bruising and really beating the child or very serious abuse it would never be enough to stop contact. Smacking as punishment will not stop contact at all. This was recent too for a friend, it has to be very bad before judges don't grant any contact to a parent.

I don't agree with it and don't smack but its not illegal.

anon2334 · 03/05/2022 16:23

I meant a friend of mine who's partner at the time smacked the kids, noy her, the court and cafcass recommended contact for dad despite that as she didn't want the kids to go weekends because he used smacking as discipline , he got shared holidays and lots of contact as well.