You responded to my comment and I did not moan that mumsnetters didn't do something 20 years ago. I mentioned that because of an incident in 2001 we saw fit to decimate an entire region for 20+ years. At no point in that time did anyone call for sanctions on us for our actions. Even now we are still involved in fucking up that region (selling arms, expertise, and support to various belligerents, or in the case of America taking direct military action) but there's still no call to sanction anyone.
Yes you did. Your post specifications talked about MNers reactions. Your post said there was ZERO outcry from the good posters mumsnet as the West lay waste
How is that not moaning the MNers didn't do something 20 years ago? And that's particular part is the part I responded to. Which is why I quoted it.
But I was talking about the situation in general, you read "Saudi terror attack" and decided I was speaking solely about 2001. I wasn't.
Again you mentioned a specific incident. I asked did you mean 9/11? You said because a single terrorist organisation with links to the region carried out an attack on the good old US of A. You said an attack. As in one.
Again, the part I was commenting on was the part I quoted in my first post.
No of course not, but in the same vein I don't think people should call for sanctions against other countries if they're not willing to have them imposed on themselves for the same actions. If you think Russia should be sanctioned for invading Ukraine then you should think the UK should be sanctioned for invading...well everywhere. If you're argument against that is "Russia are doing it now though" then fine, but you should be calling for the UK to pursue a strictly defensive military strategy from now on and do away with any offensive capability
No one is willing to have sanctions imposed on themselves. Sanctions impact normal people trying to live their lives. Even when people disagree with their governments decisions, they aren't going to push to have themsel3vs pushed into poverty. Or even ask for it.
I absolutely think we were wrong. I think we should have faced sanctions. Because that's how, it apparently, works. Again, I commented on the specific bit I quoted. That you can not compare a forums recatoon 20 years ago to its reactions today, when it's alot more popular and mainstream and there's been a huge turnover of posters.
No, your interpretation was ridiculous. As mentioned I was not talking about a specific event 20 years ago, I was talking about the entirety of the past 20+ years. And again, I still don't see anyone arguing that we should pay for what we did during that time.
Again, your position of 'mn thought this 20 years ago with completely different posters' is ridiculous. I quoted the part I was commenting on that specifically mentioned MNers and a specific incident.
Not an original no, but near and no people have not changed really. There is, and always has been, the presumption that the western way of life is the ideal and that any other way is various degrees of wrong, ranging from the tolerable to the "that shouldn't be allowed". Why do you think Russia are perpetually painted as the "bad guys"? It's quite simply because they do not embrace the western ideal of "freedom" (lol) and "democracy" (double lol), same reason China, Iran, Iraq, Syria, etc are considered baddies
That doesn't even address what I said, which you went to the effort of copying and pasting. Which said you haven't noticed people have come and gone? You haven't noticed there are new posters, new people.
Theres people who were kids 20 years ago who now post. You are seriously suggesting that this site, has all the same people.
You may think attitudes are the same. I disagree because you say people didn't talk about how sanctions would have happened if we were anyone else. But you can't honestly think its the same posters for 20 years.