How would you prefer that the appalling invasion of Ukraine by Russian forces is bought to a halt?
Boots on the ground by NATO allies?
Sanctions on Russia meaning they can't afford to run the war?
Or perhaps you think the invasion is justified and should just be allowed to go ahead?
Which is it?
I don't know if this was directed at me or the OP but as far as I'm concerned no invasion is justified. What Russia are doing in Ukraine is as bad as what we did in Iraq, Afghanistan, Libya, Korea, South Africa, Australia, India, Pakistan, and so on and so on. The difference is when we do it we expect the world to sit back and pretend what we are doing is OK and/or justified. If a Russia, China, Iran, etc do it then they are monsters and must be stopped.
It's the hypocrisy that gets me, if we are sanctioning Russia for what they are doing in Ukraine then surely we should be sanctioning ourselves for our actions across the globe?
Imagine what would have happened if Russia or China took the view that our actions in the Middle East were appalling and decided to intervene. I very much doubt anyone on mumsnet would have been saying how righteous and justified Iraq or Afghanistan was for standing up against the Western onslaught and that the UK and America should be sanctioned to the hilt for it.
As for what should happen then either we should let Russia and Ukraine get on with it and accept the outcome, or we should lead by example and lay down our own arms and declare that never again will the West get involved in a conflict that does not directly threaten us. However given the fact that the US economy is intrinsically linked to war, and the fact that we are their lap dogs, I can't see that ever happening. As far as the West is concerned war is money war is profit, war is good, and war is vital.