Lol, what?
It doesn't bother me, I was just pointing out why the message won't go over well.
If it doesn't bother you, then why are you so invested in telling the women at least on this thread, how the message won't come across well? What's the motivation for that? If it's 'laugh out loud" funny to think that you are bothered, then why even comment at all if it's so below your radar?
I'm not telling any woman to do anything
You are by your own admission, telling women why their message won't go over well by explaining to us what you think we're doing wrong and how to do it right.
Just pointing out that there are better ways to go about the way you say things.
I think you need to take your own advice there.
The sex with power? Men will always be physically stronger. What are you expecting men to do? Cut their arms off?
Typically juvenile response from a defensive man, you don't need to remove your arms (hands, feet or penis either for that matter) to not use them as weapons against women. Let's try that first?
If you say "Men rape women" it by definition insinuates that all men do, that's how the english language works. Yes, a lot of men might take offence at that. People don't like being called rapists. So, yes, some will respond with NAMALT.
Only ones who are offended (which apparently you're not, nor know anyone who is) by women being wary of all men. Being wary of all men and saying men rape/abuse/murder women is not an accusation of rape/murder/abuse against an individual man. Me saying men murder, rape and abuse women doesn't automatically mean I'm directly accusing the Pope of being an abusing, raping murderer by default (best example I can think of) it means that the statistics bear out that men are violent towards women.
I've been sexually harassed and inappropriately touched by women. Are all women responsible for the behaviour of those women? If you think men get listened to when those things happen then I've got a bridge to sell you.
Women don't get listened to either, or we get blamed for those things happening by virtue of being female and there, at least there's a little bit of equality in all this eh?
And no, all women aren't responsible for the awful acts of some, and all men aren't responsible for the awful acts of some - but - men with a mindset like yours, trying to explain to women how they're doing it all wrong, aren't contributing to a solution, you're trying to get us to change our behaviour so you don't feel bad, because that's more important to you than women being safe from the men who are violent.
Suggesting that "men" as a group are responsible for the behaviour of some other knuckle dragging men they probably don't even know is ridiculous. I'd lay blame at the door of their families and community they grew up in.
And do those communities not contain men then? Why do you feel so personally attacked by women recounting experiences that have led them to be wary of all men? Why do you feel the need to keep saying 'not all men' - especially as you claim to be not bothered by it anyway?
We know it's not all men, I have indeed had encounters with men that haven't led to negative outcomes. Unfortunately I've had enough encounters with men that have led to negative outcomes that I now view all men as having the potential to turn a situation that way.
Telling me NAMALT is not going to change that, telling me NAMALT is going to make me think you're trying to shut down conversation around that and rather than being concerned about the experiences that led to me feeling that way because I've been harmed enough times to react that way, you're more concerned that I may have a negative view of you.