[quote Graphista]@BusBusBus I agree and that's what I find esp terrifying is that people aren't seeing the bigger picture!
@onlychildhamster I wasn't saying this is the same as the holocaust I can't speak for other posters who referenced the holocaust but I think they mean the same as me - that we may not be there yet but it's certainly 2 of the steps towards such horrific political bigotry!
People need to look at how the holocaust became POSSIBLE as well as other genocides before and since - some of which WERE British perpetrated.
We are not immune from such thoughts and behaviour as a country
@boogiewithasuitcase the police and crime etc bill CHANGES what is classed as a serious crime in a similarly woolly and hard to define way. It also gives the Home Secretary huge powers of autonomy
Do those saying that I and others who are similarly very concerned about these changes REALLY want to live in a uk where someone like Priti Patel has the sole and final say on whether :
A person is a criminal
A person should be deported possibly to a country they've never even VISITED
???
@Starcup it's the "same old argument" because it is the same old reasons! Prejudice!
This reason has not only NOT gone away since the referendum was announced and farage and similar gained more exposure peoples previously hidden racist and xenophobic bullshit has become considered more acceptable
It's not!
AGAIN referencing the BUILD UP to the holocaust being possible is what I said and meant I have not said we are mid holocaust now! Do not misrepresent what I and others have said on this!
It's insulting, misleading and dishonest!
You're the one being disrespectful by ignoring HOW the holocaust and similar atrocities were made possible. It's actually quite shocking that you clearly have an interest in the events yet have failed to educate yourself as to the causes and events which led to the worst actions enacted by an elected govt in a developed modern country.
The German people are not culturally or politically hugely different to the uk. I lived there for several years on 3 occasions before and shortly after reunification. They do not shy away from their history indeed they are very open about it within the country and as part of their education system the intent being that it never happen again in that country. There are still problems with racism, right wing extremists etc AS THERE ARE IN THIS COUNTRY but as a whole they are very wary of even slightly going down that road again.
@RandomLondoner except this govt HAS made people stateless they don't care about international laws
@Starcup and others - remind you of anyone that's perpetrated genocide?! It should
Having gone to auschwitz doesn't negate your wilful ignorance/denial on this
@PAFMO I agree re holocaust and Covid measures but on THIS comparison I disagree. This is directly about disenfranchising and deporting people considered "unworthy" by the state it's a very direct comparison
This is NOT "everything" this is legislative change of exactly the type used by genocidal dictators!
@Meadowbreeze well said
he is speaking of the danger of ignoring things because they don't directly affect you which is what some of us are emphasising.
Exactly!
@ldontWanna very well said
@sashh not just Ricky Tomlinson though people will know him but many others convicted of terrorist crimes due to connections to the miners strike and cnd and other anti Tory activism at that time are still fighting to get unjust politically motivated convictions overturned
I'm also disabled with a disabled dd and I agree we have been seeing for some years the hatred towards us by the tories
He is making the point that you have to defend the rights of other people, including groups you don't agree with, if you want to protect those rights for yourself
Excellently put!
It always always starts small. Neither of these bills are small.
And in conjunction with each other are very disturbing!
Any of you attend the Sarah everard vigils? If these bills had been passed before that if you are a less than 4th gen Brit you could have been deported as a result.
One of these bills was very clearly sped up in response to the criticism of how the police and govt reacted at that time! And some clauses were changed at this time too.
Basically the police crime and sentencing bill would mean ANYONE attending those vigils could have been arrested and possibly convicted under terrorism based laws
So what’s the point in stressing about it?
Because it's unjust
Because it's a prejudicial change in laws
Because it DOES affect many uk citizens
Because further "minor" changes to such laws could well mean those of us not inc YET may be in the future
Because one of these bills gives ONE person in govt (and not even the PM) far too much power in deciding who is a terrorist and who is a British citizen
Because it feeds the right wing extremists cause
Because it stifles political discourse
Because it simply ISN'T RIGHT or fair or a decent way to treat ANYONE!
"I'm all right jack" is the most boring and pathetic response
Being of Irish descent yourself I wonder if you actually have knowledge of how the uk govt behaved in Northern Ireland? So much wasn't reported in uk news of entrapment, false accusations, even executions!
What would your Irish relatives think of your views I wonder. I know mine would be horrified if I held them
Though tbh being of Irish descent you don't have anywhere near as much ti worry about as someone of Iranian or Russian or Chinese descent do you?
Ireland is a pretty decent English speaking country. You would be able to live there fairly easily if they accept you as a citizen and they have a welfare state etc
Politically it's a democracy with reasonable laws and allows its citizens to voice their opinions
I'm not saying it's perfect it has its issues but it's hardly a war torn dictatorship which is where many of those affected by these legal changes could well be sent!
They have to have something in place for the purpose of national security. If that means revoking the citizenships of those that commit serious crimes, in order to make us all safer then I support that.
If you genuinely believe this is WHY they're bringing in these changes you're far more naive than I thought! "National security" is always the excuse for poor treatment of citizens!
Fear is used to persuade us that such laws are right and acceptable - they are not!
To enable the government to get rid of those commuting the most atrocious crimes….
Wow! You do realise that in this comment you are CLAIMING that those committing the most atrocious crimes are immigrants don't you? Where is your evidence for this?!
@Redheadedbookworm I believe yes and without notifying you under this bill if passed
[/quote]
I stopped reading 1/3 of the way in.
You win the category for the most Hysterical post.
I did just clock this part though so I’ll reply…
Wow! You do realise that in this comment you are CLAIMING that those committing the most atrocious crimes are immigrants don't you? Where is your evidence for this
Bollocks! You’re that ingrained with the notion that anyone that doesn’t see an issue with this is a racist, that you’ve literally made up a scenario.
I said people (anyone!! So stop making out I said only immigrants commit serious crimes) who commit the most henus crimes will get their citizenship revoked if possible. If they can’t have it revoked then obviously they won’t…..
The whole bludy argument you’re trying to make is that some people won’t have the worry of having the citizenship revoked. Doesn’t mean they aren’t criminals does it???! Just means they can get rid of some easier than others, it not because one set of people commit worse crimes, so get our facts straight before you make shit up in future!
Learn to read properly instead of typing in a rage and talking rubbish.