Wow, the arrogance of him. I will admit to liking his sunday times columns. He writes with good timing! He's funny.
BUT, like rugby commentator George Hook, (I'll get back to him) he cannot fathom that a woman can do something that he couldn't do.
Rugby commentator George Hook looked around him and decided it was ridiculous that all these young lasses were making real money (more than he was making commentating on rugby matches) writing novels, so he submitted a shit novel with a fake name.
Apparently it was a tough read, set during the 2nd world war. But that wasn't the worst part of it it was an incoherent read with characters nobody could grow to care about. No plot, dialogue was confusing (as in, who said that).
Why are men so obsessed with WW2. It was rejected and he was apoplectic with rage that cecelia aherne could get a novel published and he couldn't. well, she may not be Anne Enright but she is a woman not just writing as one, and knows what her readers want.
He doesn't grasp that Cecelia Ahern's books still had a plot 'arc' and characters that coherent dialogue. They may not be for everybody but she followed the formulas.
He's raging about the sexism that robbed him of a huge book deal, having been a sexist his whole life.