@Justheretoaskaquestion91
I don’t really understand the thing about summer babies?! My son is July, as is my second son and my third is due in June. Someone has to be the youngest in the year…I don’t really get why people have this thing about wanting to hold them back a year. My eldest has just started preschool and it hasn’t done him any harm at all being the youngest; you actually can’t tell and he was at home with me for 3 years before that so it’s not like he had previous experience in a nursery setting.
There are two main reasons for this.
One is that anecdotes aside, the research suggests there is a real performance difference by age, and that this can follow kids through the school system.
The second is probably why this happens, which is that school begins very early in the UK, as well as the other English speaking countries, close to many other places. Probably a little too young - quite a few kids aren't quite developmentally ready to do the kind of work they are being asked to do. This tends to affect the youngest kids, especially boys, the most. In a more appropriate system, these differences largely tend to even out by about age 8 or 9, but in the younger years children often develop at different rates.
And because these kids aren't quite ready, they can end up missing foundational skills, and they also become frustrated with school, they learn to check out, see themselves as failures, etc. None of that does them any favours long term.
A better solution would be to begin school later for all, or change the nature of the early years of school, but failing that, keeping a younger or less ready child home an extra year is a good approach.