@CuriousBogInTheNight
Once you remove age from it you see why assisted dying is so terrible.
All these people on this thread asking for assisted dying if they got dementia and couldn't care for themselves - would you argue that a child with severe learning disabilities should have assisted dying?
Absolutely categorically a different things and in no way is it comparable.
1 - There couldn’t be a greater loss than losing a child imo and I suspect the vast majority would agree. A child dying is not the natural order so parents would do everything they could to preserve their child’s life.
2 - Our bodies can’t go on forever, they give up eventually, some sooner than others. A child’s body is young and would have many many many more years left without medical intervention, even if they do have learning disabilities.
3 - Assisted dying is about the person choosing whether they’d like to continue living or not. The whole argument is about their choice, so it’s completely irrelevant to mention learning disabilities or Alzheimer’s, because obviously those people won’t be able to make the decision so it’s a moot point.
If that argument is going to be used ie quality of life, which is what I assume when you use children with learning disabilities as an example, then you could go on to compare it with drug addicts, alcoholics, and so on.
It shouldn’t be up to anyone else but the individual to decide whether their quality of life is worth fighting for. It should be their choice