@brefugee,
As I pointed out earlier, if men and women were these separate species who only interacted as predator/prey, the type of ‘analysis’ on this thread would make sense.
The reality is most men are brought up at least equally by women and most cohabit with women for at least a part of their adult lives. So, the idea that males alone are capable of influencing male violence is just not right. If every single man called out every piece of misogyny, my bet is that it would have very limited effect.
The reality is that, within all the great apes (including us) males have far more testosterone, making them bigger, stronger and more aggressive. Totally ignoring this (as this type of thread always does) is ignoring the massive elephant standing right in the middle of the room.
The same testosterone that makes men ‘manly’, gives them their sex drive and makes them attractive to women, also gives them a greater propensity to violence, if it is misdirected. It also, as pointed out above, though, means that most rescuers are also male. The heroic pilots who flew in above Chernobyl, dropping concrete to stabilise the reactor, in certain knowledge of their own deaths were all men (as far as I know), as were the firefighters running upstairs in the twin towers as everyone else was running down.
There are few things in life that are 100% good or 100% bad.
We can, as a society, continue to work together to improve men’s behaviour. But blaming ‘all men’ or thinking only men can alter other men’s behaviour is good for a sound bite, but little else. The problems are deep and complex.
(And, police are a really bad subsection of men to judge ‘men’ by. Although many are honourable, many join for the power and having legalised scraps).