FFS
*@Rhubarbsoup*. Are you insinuating I don’t give a shit about the disadvantaged for their own sake?
To me, the society I live in should be progressive, not scrambling around in the gutter looking for a fiver to eat.
Do you really think I’m going to list out my full thoughts? My OP was in response to ‘why would Gary care?’
To widen my point, the social contract is broken. As a first world country we should have a strong public sector delivering services based on need.
I accept they made mistakes but things were better under Labour.
Yes it’s expensive in the short term but long term I believe it pays off as less poverty/poor care provision means a healthier (physically and mentally) society. Have you ever head about shit life syndrome? We shouldn’t have that.
One of the many reasons for the welfare state was that during WW1 honchos were horrified by the poor state of the soldiers who signed up.
Obviously it took a good while (an entire generation) but by the 60s the social contract was a strong safety net.
People bitch about those languishing on benefits. My response is usually
- Lack of benefits affect us all
- They don’t cost that much in terms of what you would have to put in place for desperate people if you don’t help them.
- Have we looked at adult education provision so people can drag themselves up? It’s currently prohibitive to many.
- Ive never needed to claim benefits that god, but as we saw last year, they need to be sufficient in case I ever need them.
I’m ashamed to live in a country that has more food banks than McDonalds.
The likes of Neville and Rashford etc aren’t happy about that and get called champagne socialists for bringing attention by some folk who vote Tory 