Well said Blahglah.
Being a feminist or not isn’t as simple as whether you work or not. As long as people are having children, they are going to need to find ways of taking care of those children. Rather than damning SAHMs for choosing to provide that care themselves, we should be viewing traditionally ‘woman’s’ work as a vital and essential part of our economy instead of expecting it to just happen behind the scenes.
Why is it that if you look after someone else’s children as a nanny or childminder or a nursery nurse that’s seen as a career, worthy of payment, but if you look after your own children it’s ‘staying at home’ and letting the side down?
Added to that, as Blahglah says, a lot of the SAHMs I know didn’t entirely choose that life, but were essentially forced out of their jobs or passed over for promotion after they returned from maternity leave, having their ‘commitment’ to the role questioned because they had to leave on time for school pickup, or because the cost of childcare plus commuting made it prohibitively expensive for them to continue working. It makes me so sad but I see those women as victims of the patriarchy, not traitors who are upholding it.
I would like to see couples be able to make a meaningful choice about how to care for their children that doesn’t inevitably mean the career of one partner (almost always the woman) going down the toilet against their wishes. There are a lot of factors involved in making that happen but properly valuing the unpaid labour that millions of people, mainly women, are doing every day and seeing it as essential to our economy, instead of a cop-out, would be a good start.