FOJN
Ah, apologies I misunderstood..
Jasjas
its certainly very worrying that the UK, despite being one of the top military powers in the world, cannot provide air cover & logistics against a very small military force, nor can't get any help to do so (though that maybe because we never tried?
We were trying as part of NATO, at least for a while…but to run something of the scale required needs the US on board…
It’s hard to come up with numbers for the Taliban for probably obvious reasons but various sources come up with 200,000 “combatants” of some sort..so they are not really a very small force.
If the Taliban stuck to fighting conventionally perhaps in large formations out in the countryside then all that lovely high tech kit the west had would have probably finished them off a long time ago…they aren’t daft, they didn’t, so we haven’t.
As far the UK being a top military power, well it’s highly ranked but all things are relative..
“Air cover”: Sources vary but generally it is reckoned the States has something like 3000 combat aircraft, the UK just over 200…
“Logistics”: I’m not sure of the exact split when it comes to transport aircraft but I know the UK air transport force is somewhat thin in the air, so to speak due to funding/replacement of the C-130 fleet (and we on,y have one airfield dedicated to transport operations), the US air lift capacity is gobsmackingly large in comparison, multiple bases, multiples of airframes…
Ultimately the UK can still do some things extremely well but large scale high intensity operations for an almost unlimited period several thousand miles from the UK…nope…though we do have the nice new aircraft carriers, and a handful of aircraft to put on them. The UK can perhaps, to use the phrase beloved of politicians “punch above our weight” briefly, on occasions, but other than that.?