I haven’t got it because we don’t know what the future health implications are. It is a new biotechnology, never used before, with no long term safety data. It is currently used only under an Emergency Use Authorisation and has not completed even intermediate term safety trials.
The mRNA vaccines instruct your cells to manufacture the spike protein which your cells would never do naturally. It appears that those spike proteins accumulate in disparate areas of the body and can cross the blood/brain barrier. The future affects of this cannot be known for some time.
There are potential concerns for the individual of antibody dependent enhancement (ADE), and prions disease.
For society, there is the very real risk that mass roll-out of “leaky” vaccines (those that do not provide sterile immunity) may enable more severe virus mutations through greater viral “challenges”, and a wiser approach is to vaccinate only the vulnerable.
Vaccination makes little sense for those at low risk from Covid. The risk / benefit balance is wrong.
With regard to vaccination for others or “the greater good”, vaccinated people still catch Covid and still shed the same amount of virus to others. So one person’s vaccine will not protect another person, despite all the virtue-signalling that it will.
Further, I am concerned what kind of morality suggests that young people should en masse receive a new biotech vaccine with no long term safety data in order to protect the elderly? We older people should always protect the young, not vice versa.
Finally, on the topic of social exclusion and coercion, the right to bodily autonomy and free and informed medical consent was recognised and laid out under the Nuremberg code after the atrocities of medical experimentation during WW2. The world is currently at great risk of forever damaging that fundamental ethical medical principle.
Having said all that, I’d be prepared to have an “old style” vaccination like the coming Novovax, but that isn’t a choice atm.