Ross Clarke (The Telegraph 18 May):
But there is one comment of Prince Harry’s which made my jaw drop more than any other. Talking about the increasing tendency of celebrities to spew out their inner feelings, he said: “the worse the world gets, the harder it becomes, the more suffering that there is, the more people feel they have something relatable”.
Does the sixth in line to the throne really believe that the world is becoming a place of ever-greater human suffering? True, we might be in the midst of a pandemic which has killed over 3 million people, but we have had somewhat worse to cope with in the past – like the Spanish flu of 1918/19 which killed 50 million, for starters. And that is not to mention world wars, famines and so on.
On just about any measure of human development you care to take – hunger, famine, war – there has been a marked improvement in living standards over the course of Prince Harry’s lifetime. In 1984 – the year he was born – average life expectancy around the world was 62.6 years; now it is 71.7. In 1980, according to the Food and Agriculture Organisation, 26.5 percent of people in developing countries were undernourished; now it is 12.9 percent (of a far greater population). In 1984, 237,000 were killed in conflict around the world. In 2016 – the latest year for which a global figure has been calculated – it was 87,000. And so it goes on.
It is extraordinary that a man who claims he was educated not at school but on his numerous visits to Commonwealth countries still apparently believes that the world is living through an age of ever-greater suffering. Harry claims that in his post-royal life his ‘blinkers’ have come off. On the strength of his latest podcast I would say he isn’t just blinkered; he is blindfolded.
Just about sums him up for me.