It's honestly beyond belief how much royalists will lie, abuse, and change their stories. Just crazy.
Beatrice and Eugenie both live in the UK on Royal property where security is already operating which cuts down costs.
Please read what I have actually said. A poster upthread claimed that none of the Yorks receive a single penny and that they don't profit from their royal status in any way. I simply pointed out that it's not true. I didn't say they don't deserve to live in royal residences, I simply pointed out that they do. Anyway the £2 million taxpayer bill had nothing to do with extant security, it was a one-off cost because Andrew demanded a big splashy royal wedding with carriage.
The only great grandchildren to get security is those in direct line to the throne. There's no bias there, all the children have security when at home.
Not true. Security is based on need, not proximity to the throne. Archie was a target of Neo Nazi terrorists. Of course he needed security. It's completely indefensible that he was denied it.
He's a baby who lived in a secure royal residence with parents who got security.
But he himself was denied security, which meant he wouldn't have been allowed to go to school, or even go to the park with his nanny or his grandmother. All the Cambridge children have their own individual security separate from William and Kate's security (both George and Charlotte have a security detail in school with them every day), because the threat risk to them is considered to be high. High profile royal children need security, period.
Except nobody said that, you were corrected when you said members of the royal family aren’t ALLOWED to work, it was then pointed out to you that four of the Queen’s grandchildren earn their own living.
Stop lying. I said WORKING royals are not allowed to do outside work, which is true. None of the other grandchildren are working royals, they are non-working royals.