I won?t defend a point I never made. I never equated paedophilia with porn, although it is an offshoot of porn in itself, just a different niche market.
And the whole question of consent is also central here. Consent is usually something defined from a male perspective, especially in law, which is why there is a lot of confusion about it in rape prosecution policy. I am working on a paper about this problem at the minute.
Porn being very addictive, I don?t think it would be wise for an unsupported person to wade in in the name of research. Porn investigators are very closely supported to make sure they don?t become desensitised to the stuff they see ? as is common with a lot of porn usage. Hence the problem with chronic users defining what is extreme and what is not.
An analogy to heroin or other very addictive drugs might suffice ? you don?t need to get addicted to see the harm it inflicts on people, families and society.
We are sexual beings, and porn exploits our proclivity to desire sex in the same way manufactures of salty, fatty sugary foods do. We have evolved to seek out these foods because of their high nutritional value, but too much of them is anti-adaptive. The same can be said of sex addiction. There is a logical middle ground that has nothing to do with being anti-sex, but an objective observer in how porn can exploit human sexuality and send it down a road of desensitisation, addiction and exploitation of the consumer, not even the people involved.
As for links to the studies, you won?t find that particular study in an online paper but published in this book. You can get a shorter paper online but it doesn?t contain all of the data.
As for the rest, I have spent the last 5-6 years studying this, so I could post my whole library to you, but I?m not sure how far you?d get through it.
And I think we can be sure that there is no art in porn, erotica maybe..it;s interetsing in a cultural sense, not artistic
.